International Human Rights - Assignment Example

In another dimension, human rights goals have been to endorse the issue of human dignity, which ensures that violations of human rights have been elucidated in order to foster peace thus socioeconomic development. Ways through which contemporary international human rights reflect values that transcend different cultural traditions International human rights have been cited to have contributed greatly on issues affecting citizens of different countries. This is evidenced by numerous issues affecting different countries in regard to various cultural traditions and values eminent in every country.

In this regard, international human rights have been structured in such a manner that every country is well represented and their issues related to human rights articulated on. Therefore, international human rights recognize cultural differences, and put those differences into the context of standardizing human rights across the globe. For example, just like Piere and Weston noted, in the United States, Americans would be cited demanding better conditions for homeless and equality and sufficient health insurance.

On the other hand, some countries like Cuba have issues related to its citizens demanding for freedom of speech and transparent elections (Piere and Weston 3). With such deliberations, it is apparent that the international human rights had to come up with a mechanism through which these cultural differences that are evidenced through violation of human rights could be addressed. In light with this, the first step involved probing into the possibility of elucidating human rights through universal declaration of human rights by the United Nations in 1948 (Fassbender 77).

In order to standardize human rights everywhere, the commission on human rights mandated by the United Nations in drafting international bill of rights authorized all member states to formulate a draft of human rights that would have been used in the development of the international bill of rights. In light with this, it is apparent that such efforts reflect values that transcend cultural traditions across the globe. Rationale for sovereignty and its course on human rights Sovereignty and human rights have for a long time been seen as two opposed concepts with rights of the states being viewed as tending to control rights of individuals.

This is more evident in liberal democratic countries. This is reflected by the way people’s rights are violated by the political elite. Although many people with sovereignty may be seen to guarantee human rights, it is apparent that some actions by those in power violate the same rights they promise to guarantee. In another dimension, there have been contentious issues in relation whether states are justified in any way to intervene in another country’s internal affairs in the bid to push for human rights protection.

In as much as states can be justified in the intervening in another country’s internal affairs, the notion of state sovereignty barring other states from interfering with internal affairs has always paved a way for some countries to violate human rights without the fear of any interference from other states. In fact, some people believe that non-intervention by foreign states is the best way to promote human rights as well as maintaining international peace (Piere and Weston 5). However, it is correct