Nobody downloaded yet

Federalists had better argumernt about the costitution and they should work toward common good - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Name: Tutor: Course: Date: Federalists Had a Better Argument about the Constitution and They Should Work toward a Common Goal Introduction The numerous papers written by the federalists such as the James Madison to urge the anti-federalists New Yorkers to ratify Constitution expounds on the arguments of the federalists on the new Constitution…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.2% of users find it useful
Federalists had better argumernt about the costitution and they should work toward common good
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Federalists had better argumernt about the costitution and they should work toward common good"

Download file to see previous pages Will democracy function better in a larger heterogeneous community or a smaller homogenous? From the arguments presented, I believe democracy will function in a larger heterogeneous community than a small homogenous one. Madison (56) makes an argument favoring large republics unlike small republics for choosing “fit characters” in public voice representation (62). The probability of electing competent representatives is broader in a larger republic where the candidates and the voters numbers are greater. This is because of the wide option available to the voters. It is easier to fool the voters in a small republic by the candidates and harder in a larger one (Madison 62). Additionally, in a small republic, existence of variety of parties is low compared to large republics where parties are many. Therefore, in small republics, it would be easier to work and agree to accomplish their ideas. However, in a large republic, different interests will be greater hence harder to determine the majority (Miroff 20). For a long time many people have had arguments against the new Constitution with many claims that governance in United States as a democracy or a republic would be too large and had many factions as they used to refer to political parties by then. As much as Madison (56) acknowledged existence of numerous differing factions or groups, he further indicates that a democratic form of government whereby ideal rule of the majority is used would control the factions and make them cooperate and work together possibly. Furthermore, republican government created in the proposed federalists new Constitution provided the factions avenues to express their ideas and influence government’s workings by ensuring their members are appointed or elected to offices (Madison 56). Moreover, Madison (60) further states that minority groups with no doubt will be protected as the factions will have to negotiate their differences. In this manner, the republic will create a government system in which the majority will rule. However, the ideas and the suggestions of the minority will have to be considered by the government. Miroff (19) further points out that the many existing factions would imply that no single faction will be able to take full government control. Consequently, this will give rise to politics at the time as all parties will fight to dominate. Should elected representatives vote based on their superior expertise and greater sense of the common good or should they base their vote on the views of their constituents Voting enables citizens to voice their interest and to practice his/her Constitutional rights. However, due to existence of factions, violence exists. Factions according to Madison (60) mean a collection of people united by the same passions, interest and beliefs. To pursue and to realize these common goals, they don’t regard the other citizens’ rights especially the minorities. Madison (59) further affirms that the groups when assembled to form majority, always have a problem with governments that are supported by the people. From the federalists’ point of view, it comes out clearly that they proposed elected representatives unlike the voting of common citizens. According to Miroff (28), the most common and long lasting source of the groups or factions is unequal property distribution. Distinct interests are formed in the society among ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Federalists had better argumernt about the costitution and they should Essay”, n.d.)
Federalists had better argumernt about the costitution and they should Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1479591-federalists-had-better-argumernt-about-the
(Federalists Had Better Argumernt about the Costitution and They Should Essay)
Federalists Had Better Argumernt about the Costitution and They Should Essay. https://studentshare.org/history/1479591-federalists-had-better-argumernt-about-the.
“Federalists Had Better Argumernt about the Costitution and They Should Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1479591-federalists-had-better-argumernt-about-the.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Hamilton Federalists 16
... HAMILTON FEDERALISTS 16 The federalists’ wrote a total of 85 articles that promoted the approval of the U.S constitution.The 85 essays were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay with Alexander writing 51 essays, Madison 26 and jays writing 5 articles, the rest were a partnership between Madison and Hamilton. The Hamilton 16 was a 2nd part in the essays that argue that the federal laws should apply to the people and not just the states. Hamilton addresses the need for the federal government to legislate directly over the people of the United States. I agree with Hamilton on the Government having control on the activities of the people. By so doing the government not only controls what states do but also... the minority....
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
The Federalists Republic
.... Federalists had little enthusiasm towards western expansion and went ahead to support the right of Native Americans to own and retain their land. Republican Party on the other hand favored interpretation of the new constitution that opposed central government and federal privileges for commerce and manufacturing. Republican Party thought Hamilton’s plans infringed the rights of the state by helping few citizens and other’s expense. Foreign Entanglement The year 1789 witnessed the French abolishing noble privileges and in placed formed a constitutional monarch. This was a rejoicing moment for Americans because they believed the French followed their example. Radicals took control of...
5 Pages(1250 words)Book Report/Review
Federalists v. AntiFederalists
... conflicting ideological positions known as the proponents of federalism and the opponents of federalism. It should also be noted that a main precursor to the proposed federalism was the ratification of the constitution as spelled out in the so-called Articles of the Confederation. For the proposed constitution to be ratified it was required that all thirteen member states were to express their consent through ratification from elected representatives from the states concerned. It was no secret to the delegates working on the new constitution that achieving this consensus is certainly an up hill task taking into account the level of economic, social and political polarization that had characterized the nation following the heels... of...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Federalists Paper
...FEDERALIST PAPER by Alexander Hamilton Book Critique "The Federalists Paper as the most important interpretation of the United s Constitution". The most important interpretation of the United States Constitution is the compilation of 85 Federalist Papers who's one of the three founding authors and acted as the major and primary contributor is Alexander Hamilton, a statesman and a leader in working the United States Constitutional Convention which is written and published in the year 1787 and 1788 respectively. Fifty one writings belong to the intelligent idea and workmanship of Hamilton. He is also a political analyst, lawyer, officer of an Army, a politician...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Federalists and Republicans
...The Federalists Vs. The Republicans No debate in American history has been as lasting or has sparked more controversy than the issue of Federalism. In the conflict between Republicanism and Federalism there was the similarity that each believed in a central federal government. However, the Republicans believed more power should reside in the states and that they should exercise control over many of government's functions. The Federalists believed that most of the authority should reside in the central federal government. This laid the foundation for the debates between the elite insiders versus the common man, and the seat of the...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Federalists and Jeffersonians
...the Jeffersonians. Meanwhile, Jefferson was winning popular support among Southern landowners, the mechanics, workers, and the masses in general. His party was also much better with publicity than the Federalist. On the other hand, division in the Federalist party between the followers of Adams and Hamilton was seen. ("Columbia Encyclopedia") The continuation of the program of Jeffersonian repression as well as war time taxes even after Adams moved toward peace with France substantially contributed to the Republican triumph in the 1800 elections. Works Cited "Federalist Party". The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th Ed. ...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists
...Though the delegates at Philadelphia produced the Constitution, ratification was far from assured. While many saw the need for an organized, democratic national government, many people that remembered British tyranny were against the formation of such an institution. This led to the division into two separate groups in support of and opposed to the Constitution, known as the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, respectively. While each side had strong arguments to support their positions, the Anti-Federalists proved the most idealistic and democratic, though the leadership of the Federalists would prove too effective to overcome. The formation of the...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Law of the Costitution
...of Parliament as articulated by Dicey is increasingly being questioned. Parliamentary sovereignty mandated constitutional subordination of the judiciary to parliament27 and also means that UK law can override international law28, however the introduction of the Human Rights Act of 1998 was geared towards bringing about a “major constitutional change” within the UK29 to guarantee individual freedoms in national law. The Jackson case is also important is important because it raises the issue of curtailment of the powers of the House of Lords, which in turn raises the issue of imbalances in the bicameral system and the need to enhance the independence and power of the judiciary. The move...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Federalists and Republicans
... Federalists and Republicans Introduction Originally, there existed only one party in America which was called the Federalists. This party was the only governing body in America. In 1793, another party emerged. The Republicans were also known as the Democratic-Republican Party. This party was formed as a result of Thomas Jefferson's resignation from the cabinet (Murrin and et al 56). His resignation was due to his opposition to the federalists’ policies which he insisted were based on corruption and oppression of the poor. The two parties had huge differences as far as domestic and foreign policies were concerned. The Federalists aimed at enriching the wealthy class in the community whereas... , The...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
The Greater Common Good by Arundhati Roy
...The Greater Common Good by Arundhati Roy Abstract Rich and powerful nations have exercised control over the natural resources of the poor nations by using their political, military and economic power. In this agenda they were aided and assisted by the corrupt political elements in the developing nations. Wangari Maathai in the text “Deficits: Indebtedness and Unfair Trade” sheds light on how the developed world exploited and plundered the natural resources of Africa in a historical and current context. Maathai’s conclusions are supported by ample factual and statistical evidence. Arundhati Roy in her online open essay The Greater Common Good explains this trend by...
7 Pages(1250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Federalists had better argumernt about the costitution and they should work toward common good for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us