We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Edwards V. Aguillard - Research Paper Example

Comments (0)
Summary
The origin of man has been debated for long and has brought up many controversies about how people and other things came to existence. Some scholars have argued that man evolved from other animals, the apes, while others have argued that man was created by another supreme being…
Download full paper
GRAB THE BEST PAPER
Edwards V. Aguillard
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
Edwards V. Aguillard

Download file to see previous pages... From these experiments and results, it was found logically to say that man evolved from apes. Theories were created that proved these points. Then another science came into view: the creation science. With the creation science, it was argued that man was created by a supreme being, and that was the origin that proved somewhat true. Over the years, scholars have argued about the existence and origin of man. Some have supported the evolution theory while others have supported the creation science. In this particular essay, attention will be focused on a case that was ruled by the supreme court in 1987. It was between Edwards and Aguillard. Edwards supported the evolution theory while Aguillard supported the creation science theory. By the end of it all, the court had ruled that both creation science and evolution be taught in public schools. A law was created for this purpose, which received much opposition from schools that were affected by this law. The argument was that if creationism was taught in public schools, it would be unconstitutional since it would attempt to make a particular religion more advanced than the other. (Scott 199). With both theories about creation at hand, the main cause of concern was that one cannot be taught while the other is not. This would mean that if, say, creationism was taught and evolution was not, then students would dwell more about the knowledge on how people came to exist based on the creation theory (Jacobs, 33). They would not have come to know of a theory that taught the origin of man through evolution. In such a case, only one particular religion would be promoted and instilled in the young minds of students. A major question that people should ask themselves is: If one religion is taught in a public school science class, why cannot other theories about the development and origins of life also be taught in the same school? It was a biased move – one which would enable the existence and knowledge of one particular discipline while extinguishing the other (Scott 212). The major conflict was between the Creationism Act and its agreement with the Establishment Clause (Brownstein 15). The Creationism Act was such that it forbade the teaching of the evolution theory in public schools unless the teaching of creation science was also involved. At the time, there was no need for any of the theories to be taught in schools, but the Act stated that should one be present, the other should be present too. This meant that the only way evolution would be taught was by the inclusion of instructions from creation science. This, from any other view, indicated that one was nonsexist if the other was not in existence either. From this argument, it was viewed that this promoted creation science more than it did evolution (Young and Strode 232). It was more of promoting a religious doctrine that taught about the existence of life from a Christian point of view. So as to show that the Creationism Act catered for the best interests of students in schools, it was argued that both were the evidence proven scientifically, which dealt with creation and evolution, and there were also inferences from that scientific evidence (Haynes 40). Beyond doubt, both were to go side by side in science classes, and as it seemed, academic freedom was present. Academic freedom is the choice to ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
People v Ceballos
People v Ceballos Explain the nature and types of defenses used in the case and what evidence was used to demonstrate the defense. Defense of justification was used by the defendant in the People v Ceballos case (Casebriefs LLC, 2012). The defendant, Ceballos, wanted to justify that there was a physical evidence of someone breaking into his garage.
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
Jonathan Edwards
Timothy, a minister and Esther Edward. Christian theology, Bible, Classics and ancient languages were the subjects of his childhood studies (Jonathan Edwards: Biography). As a child, inquisitiveness was an observable character of Edward and he wrote two essays on the habits of flying spider and the nature of soul even at the age of ten.
2 Pages(500 words)Research Paper
Wal-Mart v. Dukes
The case was initiated by lead plaintiff Dukes who represented some 1.5 million employees and was filed against the company Wal-Mart for injunctive relief, punitive damages, and back pay on behalf of themselves because of Wal-Marts alleged discrimination against women in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Wal-Mart 1).
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
Jonathan Edwards
Jonathan Edwards was one of the most prominent leaders of “The Great Awakening” that took place in Colonial America. “The Great Awakening” was a fire and brimstone approach for the revival of Puritanism in Colonial America. Edwards felt that this society was on a path to hell and through his fiery preaching, he could scare people out of hell.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Pugh v. Locke Case
It was clear that, in those actions, the plaintiffs hunted for injunctive relief pursuant for the denial of their eighth and fourteenth amendment rights. This article will list problematic issues for prisons in the case and their solutions. This paper will also compare these problems with the current state of prisons.
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper
Bush v Gore
The problem of division of power was not settled until the Supreme Court made the decision to adjudicate the matter regarding the winning of the largest political contest of the country. The decision of the court to enter into the deep conflicting situation at that time was considered to be as inappropriate by the large group of veterans, law professors, media persons, political analysts and court watchers all over the U.S.
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
Dillon v. Champion Jogbra
However, when a company respects and follows the legal procedures in hiring employees and the operations it takes, then the company does its operations and exists legally. This means that, any deviation from legitimate practices will bring out legal issues.
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
John edwards case
Edwards was also accused of using campaign funds to pay for his mistress’ expenses (Jenkins, 2012). Edwards and his campaign officials were unethical when they all
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper
Lesson V
However, he is personally liable if he personally guaranteed for the company debts (Cooper & Lyman, 1998). Hess did not owe an ethical duty to repay on behalf of 1138 LLC as his intentions were not to defraud Siva in his company formation
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
Griswold v. Connecticut
Comstock law and argued that this law violated the right to privacy and denied people the liberty guaranteed to them by the constitution of the United States.
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Edwards V. Aguillard for FREE!
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us