Name: Professor: Course: Date: Alexander the Great and Wellington Introduction Character comparison of Alexander the great and Wellington A general is mostly the driving force of soldiers in a battle ground. Generalship entails a lot more than commanding armies in the war field…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Alexander the Great and Wellington"
Download file to see previous pages
They are expected to deliver the outcome that is positive to the society, thus enduring a formidable character to mange troops of soldiers to ensure that the outcome is achieved. Alexander and Wellington are among the historical leaders that go down in the generalship of armies as men with distinct character and personalities, leadership qualities and distinctive military philosophies. Both Alexander and Wellington, possessed personal leadership skills, which was exhibited by their superior bravery, broader knowledge, faster initiative and a better readiness to acknowledge responsibility, within the battle field. It is because of their superior courage that they were able to overpower their nemeses relentlessly until they achieved victory in the battle field. Because of their extraordinary courage they inspired their soldiers immensely and led by example while in the battle field. Their immense courage was displayed in the war at Trye, located in contemporary Lebanon reducing the strongest and influential port in the Mediterranean in a battle that lasted for seven months and witnessed a mass slaughter of natives of the port, in the case of Alexander and the war at waterloo in the case of Wellington (Keegan, 26). The two leaders were also had a commendable understanding with their soldiers. They were more of companions as witnessed when for instance; they shared meals together as pals. They had trusted friends, who were mostly private companions that they associated with, all their life, and rarely exhibited self doubt, even when faced with difficult challenges. The two leaders did not misuse or mistreat their soldiers. They understood that they were humans and treated them as such to accomplish cooperation, respect as well as inspire. This enabled them to attend to the wounded and compliment exemplary work. They understood and accepted the weaknesses of their soldiers, their fears and selfishness which inclined toward the easier way and strived to counter these difficulties and ensure that their troops were on track and ready to fight. Leadership qualities Through their courage, the two leaders led their soldiers through inspiring and placed themselves, in the forefront of the battle line. Alexander inspired and bound heroic ideal by situating initially frightfully close and eventually in the forefront of the battle line risking his life, comparatively Wellington also commanded his army from close at hand thus inspiring them. These exhibits how these generals were risk takers. Speaking to his army Alexander said “I have no part of my body in front at least that is left without scars; there is no weapon, used at close quarters, or hurled from afar, of which I do not carry the mark. I have been wounded by the sword, shot with arrows, struck from a catapult, smitten many times with stones and clubs — for you, for your glory, for your wealth (homepage.eircom.net, 1)." These indicate what he went through as a leader of the soldiers. The two generals exhibited their leadership qualities as they managed to unite their troops and successfully manage them during the war. They managed their army in a considerably practical and psychological sensitivity. They ensured that their armies were well fed, entertained, flattered, well rested, rewarded and punished when they had to punish them. This ensured that they maintained the command of the army as well as outlined
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
(“Alexander the Great and Wellington Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Alexander the Great and Wellington Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1453006-alexander-the-great-and-wellington
(Alexander the Great and Wellington Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
Alexander the Great and Wellington Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words. https://studentshare.org/history/1453006-alexander-the-great-and-wellington.
“Alexander the Great and Wellington Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1453006-alexander-the-great-and-wellington.
Alexander III of the Macedon was born in the capital of Macedonia in 365 BC. Alexander the Great Was the Son of the King of Macedonia, Philip II, the famous philosopher educated Alexander. The king of Macedonia, Philip II was assassinated in 336 BC. Alexander inherited the kingdom which was powerful but yet volatile.
As the report declares Alexander was taught by Aristotle until the age of 16 years and at a very young age of 20 he succeeded his father and took over the throne after he was assassinated. By the age of 30 Alexander had developed one of the greatest empires of ancient times. He was thought to be some kind of super human from his birth.
The legendary Macedonian name that glittered the glory of apex world conquest had only a span of thirty three years of life; however, Alexander, was from all angles, an outstanding individual example of excellence in one’s own field, and rather interestingly, his own was the greatest ever known quest for expedition and invasion of new lands and the political expansion of his empire’s unchallenged area.
The word ‘great’ did not attribute all the rulers but a few who actually deserved the title. Alexander III (356- 323 B.C.) was the great ruler who deserved the term very well. Alexander has to his credit being tutored by the great philosopher Aristotle. The impact of the teachings of Aristotle came into be effective in his later life as the conqueror
From this research, it is clear that Alexander was able to instill a marked sense of adventure and daring in his Greek troops, which followed him to the end of the world. Richard Stoneman particularly praises Alexander for harboring a vision that dared to look beyond the confines of the Greek politics and ambition, to embrace the unheard of territories and cultures.
Many reviewers of the book have pointed out the shortage of maps as one of the drawbacks. The book was criticised that there are too many anecdotes about philosophers, Gordian knot, horses and Alexander himself. It is difficult to say that it is a
Logistics is today a major worry for most of the nations in its military exercises. It is believed that proper use of logistics would improve the efficiency and confidence level of forces. The recent American war in Iraq and Afghanistan are eye openers in this regard. It is believed that management of logistics would give easy results in the war.
Alexander was born in 356 B.C. at Pella, the capital of Macedonia, to King Philip II, the King of Macedonia and Olympias, a princess of Epirus. The prince exhibited brilliance at a young age. He was taught by Aristotle, the great Plato's disciple and he went on to become a military leader of great antiquity.
This paper will describe the conquests of Alexander, paying particular attention to his influence on history of Egypt, Persia and India as well as the legacy that his empire left.It is generally thought that great scientists opened new horizons for the humanity, but in many cases rulers also were able to have a significant impact on history.
I have tried to find out more about their relationship depending on authentic books.
Perhaps most will agree that Alexander was the rarest of the rare, a blazing Sun across the horizon of history, not because he conquered most of the world, but because of his sterling qualities.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Alexander the Great and Wellington"
with a personal 20% discount.