Evita Peron Is One of the Most Powerful Women - Essay Example

Evita Peron was more powerful than male leaders, her husband included. Fraser and Navarro, in their book, Evita: the Real Life of Eva Peron, explore the life of Eva from her birth in Argentina, Los Toldos 1919 May, 17 to the time of her death and burial as a First Lady, the wife of the Argentine leader (Nicholas & Navarro 94).

Eva’s actions and steps give a vivid review of the kind of woman she was during her time. The first reason that shows that the woman had more power than other women and some men in the society is the issue of the Nazi and Argentina relationship during the cold war. Eva offered hiding places, in Argentina, to the Nazi people. This is an indication of the power the woman had. She managed to influence most of the Argentine government, including her husband to allow the Nazis to hide within their territory. This implies her daring and brave character in taking risks. It was obvious that the Nazi enemies would have reacted by waging war against them, in case they discovered their decision.

The end of the Second World War initiated and triggered powerful democratic tides on the street in different cities such as Buenos Aires threatening to Swamp Peron (Fraser and Navarro 34). The book reveals that Peron’s soldiers became angry because of his excess or total dependence on his wife for support; they forced him to resign because of this. This, analyzed, portrayed the amount of power that the woman had. She had a lot of influence on her husband, making the soldiers angry (Nicholas & Navarro 34). The anger of the soldiers was due to the tradition that women had less power compared to their male counterparts. Their beliefs and stereotyping of women as powerless individuals forced them to terminate the closeness of the president to his wife. They went ahead and forced him to resign from the seat of the vice presidency. Eva, seeing this, took the opportunity and used her persuasion power to rally support for her husband calling for his allies or friends in the worker’s union, military, and the police department. This led to riots in Casa Rosada giving the couple leeway to flee the city (Nicholas & Navarro 43).
The navy discovered their hidden cottage and went to arrest them. Eva, on seeing this, went out of furiously out of control with anger and rage, and forced them to take away her husband, but left her behind. The reason why they left her had been the question and the debate of many Historians in Europe and the entire globe. Reliable and trustworthy sources like Fraser and Navarro, in their book, state an interpretation of this that it was the strange ego and brevity of the woman that scared them. Others would ask why they decided to take the husband. Was the husband not strong enough to defend himself?
From the above illustrations, it is evident and undoubtedly true that Evita is exercising a charismatic type of authority over the people. Her authority and power are not only derived from her position in the Argentine government as the First Lady, but also from her brevity and daring nature. The action of facing the soldiers with anger and fury is an indication that she is a brave woman who is ready to approach the male soldiers without fear. Besides, she is the only woman in entire Argentina who has shown a lot of power and influence on the governance and ruling of her husband.

Rational legal authority is seen in Juan Peron. His authority is controlled by the Argentine constitution. Even as a president, he observes the constitution to the letter, and is not willing to break any law in it. His willingness and acceptance to be taken away by the soldiers, leaving his wife behind is an indication that he observes the rule of law and not the law of rule. He does not misuse his authority. The party he represents practices traditional authority. This is the reason why they do not like Evita (Nicholas & Navarro 97). They believe that women do not have the power to question or advise men in matters related to leadership.
Individual rights are mainly limited through the observance of traditional rules. For instance, women are denied their rights because of the traditional belief that they have no say in the governance of society. Another way of limiting or interfering with individual rights is using forces and security agencies to beat up and capture rebels. An example is the capture of Peron by the soldiers.