Name: Tutor: Course: Date: University: Henry David Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience and Other Essays Abolitionist movement is a reform movement that was widespread in the 18th and 19 Centuries. Most often, it is called anti-slavery movement, since it sought to stop the enslavement of individuals in Europe and in the America…
Download file to see previous pages...
This paper will highlight which justification of the two camps was more persuasive to the public as well as the reason why the battle to win the public’s heart was important. Slavery was prominent in America in the 19th Century. In his sixth debate, Lincoln-Douglas said that domestic slavery, a “disturbing” and “dangerous element,” was existing in America (Lincoln-Douglas, Lincoln-Douglas 6th Debate 1858). Abolitionists fought to end slavery. Slaves underwent many hardships, as revealed by Frederick Douglass in his narrative. Such hardships included slaves working in huge plantations and were treated as animals. There were no laws that could protect slavery and the atrocities against them were never talked about. However, the abolitionists’ efforts to end slavery were resisted by the slaveholders, who felt they could be deprived of their rights should they lose the slaves. Slaveholders had a belief that in order for them to prosper economically, they had to keep slaves. Therefore, the continuation of slavery was essential. It was evident that African slaves provided cheap and readily available labor. Furthermore, the slaveholders feared for their own safety should the slaves be freed, since, according to them, the slaves might take over or revenge on their former masters. This triggered the most proactive, bitter and bloody struggle between the antislavery (abolitionists) and the proslavery (slaveholders) in the United States in the mid-19th Century. Abolitionists such as Thoreau made efforts to fight slavery. In his Civil Disobedience and other Essays, Thoreau talks about the necessity to give priority to the conscience of an individual over the demands of the law. He strongly criticizes the institution of slavery. He disputes the assertion that the government gets its power from the majority since this group is the strongest, and not because they have the most legitimate viewpoint (Thoreau 1993, p2). In this regard, Thoreau continues to assert that individuals have the obligation to do what, according to their conscience, is right and not to blindly follow the law that favors the majority. When the government is unjust, people are supposed to refuse the law and distance themselves from such a government (Thoreau 1993, p7). Additionally, people should see to it that they educate themselves on the legitimate law and fight for their rights. This assertion is depicted when slaves began to read and were enlightened about the injustices they were facing (Douglass 2005 p29). The slaves and the abolitionists started fighting to end slavery because people tended to hold dear their own prosperity and liberty. Slavery has been the main threat of people’s liberty and prosperity, and this already worsening condition cannot be improved by enlarging slavery (Lincoln-Douglas, Lincoln-Douglas 7th Debate 1858). Therefore, abolitionists realized there was need for united efforts to improve the status of the black population, which was being abused through slavery. Slaves regretted their own lives and wanted to empower themselves so that they can attain freedom (Douglass 2005 p30). While abolitionists were empowering themselves in order to attain freedom, slaveholders were having sleepless nights. Several slaveholders struggled to oppose the positive efforts that were being administered by the abolitionists. Most slaveholders found
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Henry David Thoreau's Civil Disobedience and Other Essays Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1440219-henry-david-thoreauyies-civil-disobedience-and
(Henry David Thoreau'S Civil Disobedience and Other Essays Essay)
“Henry David Thoreau'S Civil Disobedience and Other Essays Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1440219-henry-david-thoreauyies-civil-disobedience-and.
He then went on to say that the government never does what it should, but we still give it the power to do anything they want. He also believed that the government always treats people unfairly, punishing them when they want to if it makes them look good.
Rosa Parks knew that it was not right that she give up her seat on an Alabama bus to a White man. Mack resisted this inequity by simply burping and dismantling the King’s stack of turtles. Rosa Parks responded to her feelings against racial discrimination, by refusing to surrender her seat to a white man.
This quid pro quo arrangement (or something for something) is the delicate balance between individual rights and the intrinsic interests of the larger society. This is quite a contentious issue because governments sometimes abuse the powers given to them, and this abnormal situation happens in the best of circumstances, even in a democracy.
It is also important to note how they achieved social change despite all the odds arrayed against them, and what are the key success factors that finally gave them what they wanted. Three famous people in our times achieved great things, such as Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862) who was abolitionist, the great Mahatma Gandhi of India (1869-1948), and lastly, Martin Luther King of America (1929-1968).
In Oscar Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray, the main character, Dorian Gray, literally loses his soul when the portrait that is made of him represented his soul, and, as such, took on the appearance of all his evil and misdeeds.
Risking punishment, such as violent retaliatory acts or imprisonment, they attempt to bring about changes in the law. (Carton 1998) In the modern era, civil disobedience has been used in such events as street demonstrations, marches, the occupying of buildings, and strikes and other forms of economic resistance.
The doctrine of self-reliance and individualism developed through the belief in the identification of the individual soul with God. Transcendentalism was intimately connected with Concord, a small New England village, 32 kilometers west of Boston. Concord was the first inland settlement of the original Massachusetts Bay Colony.
This paper will put forward the argument that in modern time’s civil disobedience has played an important role in shaping the law in the United States and will even focus on whether civil disobedience is justified or unjust in compliance with the positive, natural and sociological theory of law.
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Henry David Thoreau's Civil Disobedience and Other Essays for FREE!