Nobody downloaded yet

A Jurors Perspective in the Case against Socrates - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The paper "A Juror’s Perspective in the Case against Socrates" highlights that Socrates accusers have not explained what constitutes misguiding the youth. Using the little information provided to the court by the accusers, this is only interpretable to mean that the teaching of inquisitiveness taught by the accused to the public…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.6% of users find it useful
A Jurors Perspective in the Case against Socrates
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"A Jurors Perspective in the Case against Socrates"

Download file to see previous pages Personally, I find nothing wrong with being inquisitive. Inquisitiveness has been the source of great knowledge for a long time. The fact that Socrates has been inquisitive, enquiring the earth and the clouds constitute no crime. If his chosen way of life does not harm anyone, and no one can confirm that he harmed anyone by being curious, then I find no fault at that. Of concern is the substance of which he enquires about. Contrary, Socrates has confessed to the things he enquires. He has said that he enquires about the presence and the nature of knowledge in selected persons. This, he has confessed, is to try to refute the claims of the Delphin oracle, which he claims elevates him as the wisest man in Athens. First, this raises the question of whether it is true that the oracle construed that he was the wisest man. If it is true, then such an important decree from the Athenian god Apollo should have been made known to all Athenians. The fact that this did not happen, is interpretable that the accused has put words in the mouth of a god. By claiming that the gods have recognized him as the wisest man, Socrates undermines the power of the Athenian gods by elevating himself as superhuman. He elevates himself to the level that he converses with the gods, though he is not a priest. In this issue, the accused is guilty of heresy and slander against the gods of Athena. His comparison of himself with Heracles is an insult to all Athenians and their integrity. It is an insult to the time-honored belief about the gods and the heroes of our history (Colaiaco 62). Second is the claim that he teaches his inquisitive lifestyle to others. In his defence, the accused has pointed out that he has never been a teacher. He does not take money from anyone in exchange for his perceived teachings. Therefore, if anyone goes to him, it is of his own accord. The teachings gained thereof that are one’s own desire. However, the place where the lessons are offered becomes very difficult for the citizens of Athena to decide whether to attend or not. The accused has confessed of a tendency to start his teachings in public, where people gather for other purposes. This does not leave any choice to those in such areas, whether to listen or leave. This is so because there are in such places in pursuit of their own affair. Additionally, the accused has a tendency to stop people on the way and start questioning them. This constitutes a disruption of public peace. He propagates dissension and enmity among the people. If one is a teacher, he should let his students come to him on their own will. This is not in the interests of the state. The questioning of people regarding the level of wisdom is also demeaning. This is quite serious when it is considered that some of the subjects of the defendant’s questioning are citizens of high ranking. These people have made a significant contribution to the advancement of the nation. Branding these people as lacking wisdom and knowledge is a dishonor and a disparagement of their good work and sacrifices. On these charges, Socrates is guilty. The next charge brought against Socrates was the claim that he misguides the youth. His accusers have not explained what constitutes misguiding the youth. Using the little information provided to the court by the accusers, this is only interpretable to mean that the teaching of inquisitiveness taught by the accused to the public. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“A Jurors Perspective in the Case against Socrates Research Paper”, n.d.)
A Jurors Perspective in the Case against Socrates Research Paper. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1438320-history
(A Jurors Perspective in the Case Against Socrates Research Paper)
A Jurors Perspective in the Case Against Socrates Research Paper. https://studentshare.org/history/1438320-history.
“A Jurors Perspective in the Case Against Socrates Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1438320-history.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
The Socrates' Philosophy
He has also pondered about the certainty called “death” which all human lives must succumb to. The great man’s ideas about these somber issues are portrayed in his conversations with Euthyphro, Glaucon, Polemarchus, Adeimantus, Cephalus, Thrasymachus, Cleitophon and so on. At the same time, Socrates is an extremely intelligent man.
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper
Research Confucius and Socrates
Confucius desired to restore the lost justice and harmony of Chinese society through his remarkable teachings throughout his lifetime. He continued his effort to establish harmony until his death at the age of 72 in 479. Socrates, the greatest of all Greek philosophers was born in a relatively poor family in Athens and spent his whole lifetime there.
2 Pages(500 words)Research Paper
The OJ Simpson Trial
O.J Simpson is considered to be one of Americans well-known personality around the globe to face the case of murder. People around the world were mesmerized and chase on the June 17, 1994 incident; the murder of Nicole Brown-Simpson, his ex-wife, and Ronald Goldman wherein Simpson was identified to be the main suspect.
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
Trial Proceedings Research Paper
In the core of this process are different rules and decision-making processes that are highly crucial. The US Constitution, US code, Bill of Rights, court decisions, state constitutions, state codes, department rules and regulations, federal and state rules regarding criminal procedure are some of the sources of the rules in the criminal justice system (Samaha, 2011).
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper
Socrates and his trial
There are no written records from Socrates himself. However, most of the knowledge and teachings from Socrates are available to modern day readers from the dialogues that he held with his famous pupil, by the name Plato, who lived in the periods of 427 BC to 347 BC.
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper
According to the viewpoint claimed by Plato with his dialogues in Protagoras, there exists an undeviating interrelation between moral truth and ordinary common sense. As can be observed from Protagoras’ acclamations, the personal values and beliefs of an individual regarding different aspect of virtue and morality are indistinctive.
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
Socrates Trial and Death
His rather impious approach to Athens’s beliefs and introduction of his own gods landed him in a court of law where he was sentenced to death at the age of
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
How does Socrates trial and punishment resemble those of Malcolm X Whose journey was more important or more significant
Really, both Socrates and Malcolm X were popular figures, using the masses as the source of inspiration and knowledge. Both stood out of the crowd, sending the message of a profound mental and
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
Competency to Stand Trial
ng in the field of forensic assessment and consultation are the most people involved in these cases because competency issues are raised many times than insanity defense. In the United States, it has been estimated that there are between 25,000 and 30,000 evaluations that are
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper
Trial of Galileo Galilei
History reports that the world saw a overwhelming conflict between science and religion when Galileo decided to come up with his theories of celestial motion, which heavily contradicted the orthodox geocentric theory. Geocentric theory proposed
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic A Jurors Perspective in the Case against Socrates for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us