StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Why did non-slave owners fight in the civil war - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The American civil war is one of the most important events in US History. Not only did it revolutionize the US constitution, but it changed the life of many who had previously been living in conditions of slavery…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97% of users find it useful
Why did non-slave owners fight in the civil war
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Why did non-slave owners fight in the civil war"

?Why did non-slave owners fight in the civil war? The American civil war is one of the most important events in US History. Not only did it revolutionize the US constitution, but it changed the life of many who had previously been living in conditions of slavery. It is estimated that over three million soldiers took part in the civil war, with two million fighting for the Union states and one million fighting for the Confederate states (Catton & McPherson, 2004). Around 600,000 of these soldiers died in combat, making it the deadliest war in American history (Catton & McPherson, 2004). One of the main reasons for the American civil war was that many people in the northern states felt that slavery was immoral and unnecessary, whilst those in the south wanted to keep their slave-owning plantation way of life. It is easy to understand why those in possession of slaves would want to keep their lifestyle and their cheap labor source, but why did non-slave owners fight in the civil war? Inequality Whilst it may seem ridiculous to some to support a system that does not benefit yourself, such as non-slave owners supporting slavery in the civil war, but there are many reasons why. One of the main reasons is that black people and white people were not seen as equal at the time. The general consensus of the time was that those of African descent were a slave race (Hansen, Gallagher & Jakes, 2010) and deserved to be treated as such. This is one of the reasons why inequality lasted for such a significant amount of time after the civil war; it was difficult for some people to accept equality. Despite many soldiers fighting for the Confederate states not owning slaves, it may be that these individuals wished to maintain the quality of life. In the case of those who were termed ‘poor whites’, it may have been that they enjoyed being part of a system in which they were superior to one set of people; the African slaves. The abolition of slavery meant that everyone was equal, but those with money still retained some superiority. Those who were part of the ‘poor white’ lost their superiority altogether and may have felt uncomfortable with this idea. The culture of slavery was deep-rooted in society at the time and many are often uncomfortable with changes to the social order, and this may have been an example of this phenomenon (Catton & McPherson, 2004). The abolition of slavery did require a significant change to the social system of the day, so the Confederate supporters were not wrong to be worried. However, in recent decades the status of African Americans is now seen as equal to that of whites in the United States, so it is evident that some time has shown that there was a reason to fight for this equality, despite the problems it may have caused the Confederate soldiers at the time. It is interesting to consider how those labelled ‘poor whites’ of the day reacted to the abolition of slavery, and how they were now seen as equal to black, whereas prior to this the colour of their skin still set them apart. This was probably one of the major reasons why non-slave owners fought in the civil war. State Pride Something that may be easier to understand for modern Americans is the concept of state pride. As the ownership of slaves was so deeply ingrained into culture, some soldiers may have wanted to go to war to prevent themselves being under the legislation of the Union states who did not necessarily understand the way of life in the south (Hansen, Gallagher & Jakes, 2010). In many cases, soldiers would have been proud to be fighting for their state, despite their beliefs or their slave ownership status. Slavery was one of the main issues in the American civil war, but it was not the only one. Many people on both sides of the civil war believed in what is known as State Sovereignty, which essentially maintains the right of each individual state to control and create its own laws (Catton & McPherson, 2004). The Union was fighting to unite the states, both southern and northern, to create a more harmonious single country (what is now the United States of America). This would change the face of the United States forever, creating a constitution that was applicable to all. Again, this was not just an issue of slavery (although this is often cited to be one of the more important features of the Union laws) but an issue of retaining the autonomy to freely create laws that are applicable to one state. Social Pressures Something that seems to be prevalent in many wars involving large numbers of young men as soldiers is social pressures. In this case, when someone saw a friend or relative going to war, they may feel the social pressure to go along. It may be seen as unpatriotic not to accompany the troops onto the battlefield (Fields, 1990), and many who did not join in may be labelled as cowards. Although a non-slave owner may not feel the impetus to go along to war to protect his way of life, he may be interested in protecting his role in society and he may be supporting those who support the cause more fully. Men seem to be particularly vulnerable to this pressure. Equally, if the wife of a young man supported slavery or came from slave-owning stock, she may desire her husband to go and fight for the cause. This may seem ridiculous to people of today, as the label ‘coward’ no longer seems to hold such a stigma and there are less societal pressures to go to war. Protecting the Southern Way of Life Something that is linked to many of the causes that is often cited is that some soldiers may be fighting to protect the way of life that was so prevalent in the south, including slave ownership. As a non-slave owner, the impetus may be less on protecting existing slaves but protecting the lifestyle that accompanied slave ownership. Many of the other traditions of the south were felt to be at risk, such as the dances, the typical southern belle and the social hierarchy. Someone that did not own slaves may not have access to all of these elements of the southern lifestyle, but they may be fighting to protect it for others or still prefer this to what they foresaw from a Union win. This is again linked to state pride, but on a much larger scale, as it involves customs and traditions rather than fighting for the state itself. It also involves more complex rituals that may be unknown to the people of today. Additionally, the desire to protect the southern way of life may be linked to social pressures, as it may have seemed unpatriotic or unsympathetic to not go to war, despite the fact that these individuals did not own slaves (Catton & McPherson, 2004). Conclusion Whilst it may not necessarily be immediately obvious why a non-slave owner would go to war, when the depths are explored it seems fairly obvious. A young man may not wish to be branded a coward or unpatriotic, something that held even more weight at the time than it does today. Black people were still seen as inferior, and losing their slave status required a whole reinterpretation of the social system, something that went on for decades after the abolition of slavery (Fields, 1990). There may have been additional pressures linked to protecting the southern way of life, something that was very precious to many living in the era. It is obvious after these explorations that many of the people involved in the American civil war may not have been pro-slavery, and may not even have owned slaves themselves, but they still found many reasons to fight and join their compatriots on the battlefield. Works Cited Catton, Bruce, and James M. McPherson. The Civil War. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2004. Print. This is a well-known paper about the race issues in the civil war. It is good for this research as it illustrates how African Americans were viewed at the time of the civil war, showing how important the issue was, even to non-slave owners. Fields, B.J. “Slavery, race and ideology in the United States of America.” New Left Review 181.1 (1990): 95–118. Print. This book is a general civil war history book, with authors well known for writing lively civil war history. It is useful in this project because it illustrates that slavery was not the only reason for the civil war. Hansen, Harry, Gary Gallagher, and John Jakes. The Civil War: A History. Penguin Group (USA) Incorporated, 2010. Print. Thiis book is a general civil war history book that gives a great detail about the reasoning behind going to war. It is for students and those interested in the histor of the American civil war. It aids this research by giving reasons why non-slave owners might fight in the civil war, and the authors are well known for writing books on this topic. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Why did non-slave owners fight in the civil war Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1438042-why-did-non-slave-owners-fight-in-the-civil-war
(Why Did Non-Slave Owners Fight in the Civil War Research Paper)
https://studentshare.org/history/1438042-why-did-non-slave-owners-fight-in-the-civil-war.
“Why Did Non-Slave Owners Fight in the Civil War Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1438042-why-did-non-slave-owners-fight-in-the-civil-war.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Why did non-slave owners fight in the civil war

History of Multicultural America

However, the African servants that came to the colony were war captives or from enemy tribes (Takaki).... Even after the war, their testimonies were not collected as they were recorded from White soldiers (Takaki).... The major result of Bacon's Rebellion for blacks was an increase in black slavery as the farm owners in fear of another rebellion and its aftereffects, started investing in acquiring slaves in place of indentured servants to get rid of any similar issue at all....
9 Pages (2250 words) Assignment

The Abolition of Slavery into the United States

Life for African Americans in the United States after the abolition of slavery The end of the civil war declared the US a new and wholly free nation in 1865 (Foner).... The abolition of slavery with the end of the civil war raised a range of complications for the African Americans.... Freedom fight of the slaves in the post-civil war and the Reconstruction Era transformed into a struggle for survival.... Manual labor could be replaced easily in the post-civil war era....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Slavery and the Mississippi Secession

Abraham Lincoln summed it up better in his Gettysburg address, which was written after the start of the civil war: “All men are created equal.... hellip; The authors included, Jefferson Davis, a former senator of the Union, veteran of war and later, the first president of the Confederate United States; another senator of Mississippi and a number of Mississippi Representatives of the House.... The authors included, Jefferson Davis, a former senator of the Union, veteran of war and later, the first president of the Confederate United States; another senator of Mississippi and a number of Mississippi Representatives of the House....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Slavery and Racial Discrimination in the US

?? by William Faulkner} and some of the events in ‘Roots' by Alex Haley occur during the 1800 – 1865 period in American History, a period during which racial discrimination… While racial discrimination continued to exist during the post-1865 period {until the civil Rights Act of 1964 put blacks on par with whites in the country}, it did not contain what the pre-1865 period did, namely, the worst category of Slavery was introduced into the United States by English settlers who first arrived in Virginia in 1619....
15 Pages (3750 words) Essay

Causes and Excuses for the United States Civil War

There is a great deal of disagreement upon the root causes of this war, but it boils down to one simple point, according to Basler , “The ultimate cause of the civil war was simply human disagreement, which could not be, or rather was not, resolved by non‐ violent means.... Lincolns War, the War Against Slavery, the War for Abolition, the Southern Rebellion, the War of the Rebellion, the War for Southern Rights, the War of the Southern Planters, the civil war, Americas Civil War, the War Between the States, the civil war Between the States, the War Against...
12 Pages (3000 words) Research Paper

The Essence Of Freedom: The Political And Economic Precursors To The Civil War

This essay "The Essence Of Freedom: The Political And Economic Precursors To the civil war" discusses how the only people assured liberty under these words were Anglo-American men: white men of British descent.... All others would have to fight for their liberty, including women, the Irish, the Italians, and most notably, those who were brought to the United States as slaves from Africa.... All others would have to fight for their liberty, including women, the Irish, the Italians, and most notably, those who were brought to the United States as slaves from Africa....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Historiography: on Slavery Causing US Civil War

According to Green, slavery was a central issue that ignited the civil war(Green, 2008, p.... The confederate states and Lincoln's administration failed to come into good terms, and the situation soured threatening on a civil war.... Historians have varied reasons that gave birth to the civil wars.... The war comprised of the United States and seven South American states that were used as a home for the slaves.... The number of the rival states grew from… The cause of the war was due to the pressing issue of slavery....
11 Pages (2750 words) Research Paper

Racial Politics within the Union Army during the Civil War

While Lincoln toyed at first with the idea of permitting black recruitment during the civil war, he knew it would not sit well with many of his military commanders and some politicians as well.... nbsp; … Life for soldiers, black and white, after the war was not easy.... Blacks were now allowed the “privilege” of serving, a privilege that uncovered racist proclivities in the military that remained intact through World war II, the most prominent of which, the segregation of blacks into their own units, a topic that will be more fully discussed later....
12 Pages (3000 words) Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us