The State of Alabama is alleged to have passed electoral laws, which were deemed discriminatory. The District court had dismissed the claim by stating that the Civil Rights Act of 1957 did not offer grounds on which the suit could be brought. The case was brought before the Court of Appeal after the Civil Rights Act had been amended in order to allow such action to be brought. The Supreme Court in its ruling on the case depended upon the revised version of the 1957 Act and vacated the judgments of the lower courts. The action was brought against the State of Alabama, Board of Registrars of Alabama and as individual respondents (Buono, 2004). Since the registrars had been sued in their capacity as registrars the lower court ruled that since they had ceased from their functions in their offices they could not be sued in their official capacities. The lower court held that even if they had still been registrars, the United States had no right to sue them since the board of registrars could not be sued in its capacity as a board of registrars. Similar cases like the American Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades Council and Reynolds v. United States among others followed the principle that cases that are brought before a court of law should and must be decided by the prevailing law even if they had been decided at an earlier time or in lower courts with another version of the law.
Prison system is a necessary for a developed society as it promotes the concept of right and wrong in the society. Deterrence is also an important aspect of prisons as they instill fear in the hearts and mind of the members of the society and forces them to abide by the rule of law.
Health disparity is defined in terms of demographic, social, geographic and environmental attributes. The term “health disparity” is commonly utilized interchangeably with health inequality. Health inequality is often used in economic and scientific literature to signify the population health measures associated with group-or-individual specific characters such as education, income or ethnicity/race (Shapiro et al., 2008).
It can be viewed globally as the recruitment, harboring, transportation and receipt of persons by use of force or threats, coercion and other inhuman forms such as abuse of power, deception and abduction (Haerens, 2012) motivated by receiving of remuneration or other benefits but for the purpose of exploitation of the transferred or harbored persons.
This source was selected based on the credentials of the author. Julian E. Zelizer is professor of History and Public Affairs at Princeton University. Zelizer is one of the leading figures in the field of American political history
The resolving of the cases involving the destruction of the environment by the power plants with carbon dioxide and other green house gases is not limited to the political arena. The plaintiff, which includes the states and the public, has the
After the start of the war there was an increased demand that Japanese individuals residing in America including those who have migrated and even those who were born in the nation were to be looked upon as saboteurs and needed to be evacuated from the Western Coastal regions
ible for creating controversy regarding economic benefits, ethnicity, settlement patterns, and jobs for non-immigrants, crime, voting behavior, and upward social mobility. Smith and Barry (43) denotes that analyzing the immigration policy of the US on the basis of a per capita
Thus, they may want a replacement, strengthening or improvement. In that case this paper will focus on the problem of drunk-driving deaths amongst teenagers in the Australia. It will also propose three
5 pages (1250 words)Research Proposal
Cite this document
(“Analysis of U.S. Supreme Court Case in United States v Alabama Research Proposal”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/history/1436691-us-supreme-court-united-states-vs-alabama
(Analysis of U.S. Supreme Court Case in United States V Alabama Research Proposal)
“Analysis of U.S. Supreme Court Case in United States V Alabama Research Proposal”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1436691-us-supreme-court-united-states-vs-alabama.
Cited: 0 times
The State of Alabama is alleged to have passed electoral laws, which were deemed discriminatory. The District court had dismissed the claim by stating that the Civil Rights Act of 1957 did not offer grounds on which the suit could be brought. …