The researcher of this paper aims to evaluate and present The Struggle of Land Rights among the Navajo Tribe. This struggle of Navajo tribes for land and settlement has been defined and influenced by the doctrine of manifest destiny…
Download file to see previous pages...
The paper tells that almost four decades after the ratification of the Relocation Act, the removal procedure keeps on. Even though the initiative has been seriously and constantly denounced, it has had merely narrow modifications and has never been severely pressured with closure. The hesitance of Congress to financially support it at a point that would have terminated it more quickly may partly reveal the undecided sentiments of several of those who permitted its continuation. Opposition from the targets of relocation, under the headship of quite a few religious leaders and aged Navajo women, resulted in a chain of constitutional measures, the most triumphant being the case of Manybeads claiming that relocation infringed their religious rights. Just like in numerous other cases of relocation, the underlying reason of the relocation of the Navajo people had nothing do with their interests or welfare. The case of Navajo is distinctive in the sense that it does not require the ravaging of their territories and does not belong to any development plan. Nevertheless, as in other instances of displacement, Navajos target for relocation were not permitted to choose freely whether to abandon or stay in their lands. Scudder and Cernea emphasize in their relocation classifications that triumphant relocation plans should take into account the needed socioeconomic elements for building enduring bonds to the new land. Nevertheless, both scholars argue that majority of relocation plans was unsuccessful. The senior consultant on social policy for the World Bank, Michael Cernea (1998), supports positive collaboration between sociological and economic disciplines for the purpose of decreasing relocation and improving the subsistence of relocatees.4 The Navajos’ relocation from the Hopi Partitioned Land (HPL) has been disastrous. It was badly premeditated and executed forcibly. The relocation procedures have been performed in lack of knowledge of the Navajo people’s land possession and dwelling patterns, livelihood, and economic production.5 A number of the most unfavorable outcomes of this relocation could still be alleviated with sufficient subsidy, developmental design, and practical conditions for actual community involvement. However, with no such dedications, aimed at reviving or regaining abandoned economic production prospects, it is not likely that complete economic resurgence will ever happen.6 Examining the responses of the Navajo people to forced relocation from HPL clarifies several common features of the response differences of the displaced people, the vitality of economic production self-rule, and importance of traditional land possessions. Relocation is comparatively triumphant merely when the targets of the relocation revive or broaden their economic production tasks.7 Nonetheless, forced removal harms inhabitants and no measure can quantify the difficulties of these people against the actual reparation they get. The U.S. Government versus the Navajo John O’Sullivan, an American correspondent, introduced the concept of ‘manifest destiny’ in 1845 to characterize American westward expansion. As stated by this principle, white Americans were fated to expand westward by God’s will. American merchants, as early as the 1820s, disseminated encouraging accounts of the Navajo People and frequently conveyed compassion and high regard for their attempts to oppose the Mexicans inhabiting contemporary New Mexico.8 Frontiersman Josiah Gregg, for instance, assumed that the New Mexican people and their chief had “greatly embittered the disposition of the neighboring savages, especially the Navajos, by repeated acts of cruelty and ill-faith well calculated to provoke
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“How the Manifest Destiny Affected Native Americans in the U.S Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1431520-how-the-manifest-destiny-affected-native-americans-in-the-us
(How the Manifest Destiny Affected Native Americans in the U.S Research Paper)
“How the Manifest Destiny Affected Native Americans in the U.S Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1431520-how-the-manifest-destiny-affected-native-americans-in-the-us.
No person in the U.S. shall, on the basis of sex be excluded from participation in, or denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any educational program or activity receiving federal aid.
What lead Orestes Brownson to coin the term Manifest Destiny?
Religion for many centuries offered different “school of thoughts” which scholars also term as "truth-claims”, hence a feeling of being an American. These truth claims offer different ideologies, which are based according to the nature of the religion.
The ideology and practice of Manifest Destiny which included expansionism based on nationalism, “influenced United States Policy particularly in the last six decades of the nineteenth century” (Mountjoy 2009: 13). This justified the forcible removal of American Indians, the annexation of Mexican land, and the war with Mexico in the 1840s.
According to the research findings, it can, therefore, be said that the Cheyenne people who initially colonized a vast section of America form a small section of the American population. They are even classified among minority groups. The general income level is much less as compared to Whites. However, Native Americans are recognized as a special minority group by the US government.
Besides peer influence like during college and stress related problems that can lead one to drinking, alcoholism can run in the family so that a son can be influenced into drinking by his alcoholic father or relatives. Native Americans show over indulgence in alcoholism to a great extent and their over indulgence in alcoholism can be controlled by taking proper steps at the school systems’ level and federal government’s level by working in collaboration with Native Americans and their families.
Whites continued to encroach on Indian lands, sparking conflicts that eventually forced the Native Americans further and further from centers of white civilization. By the time of the American Revolution, most of the Native Americans in New England had relocated far away from their ancestral homelands, died from foreign diseases, such as smallpox, or through the increasing warfare between the colonists and the natives.
in family and tribal groups with common practices, though they mixed up with different communities across different centuries.1 These tribal mixtures involved both Indian communities, as well as, immigrants such as the Europeans. The primitive ancestors are believed to have
Richard Henderson signed a treaty on March 15, 1175, that transferred most of Cherokee native land to the Transylvania Company. Factors surrounding the signing of this treaty were to affect the way Kentucky was to treat natives for a very long time. The most significant factor was the interpretation of a tribal leader's-remark at the treaty signing.
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic How the Manifest Destiny Affected Native Americans in the U.S for FREE!