The ambitious objectives of two powerful nations, Russia and Japan, spawned enough conflict in 1904 that war appeared to be the single and most appropriate solution. Japan, emerging from the Meiji Restoration with a Westernized military preparation and inundated with dreams of expansion, and Russia, trying to spread out their supremacy in the East, eventually staged the historical Russo-Japanese War…
Download file to see previous pages...
The two imperial nations engaged in fierce diplomatic attempts over matters concerning Manchuria and Korea, both aiming to grab hold of those territories to expand their kingdoms. Widespread expectation in the Western hemisphere was that Russia would wipe out the military forces of Japan with her large defense forces (Steinberg et al. 2005), but most Japanese government officials were convinced that their highly trained and specialized armed forces will give them military advantage over Russia. The overconfidence and conceit of Nicholas II, the Russian Tsar, hampered concessions between the two superpowers; Japan attacked, then Russia, immediately after, received a Declaration of War (Steinberg et al. 2005). Nonetheless, after the battle at Tsushima, Russia was forced to surrender. It surrendered Manchuria, Port Arthur, and any efforts to occupy Korea, and had damaged irreparably the repute of several admirals and generals (Steinberg et al. 2005). The unfavorable outcomes for Russia are not possible to overstate, with the defeat of trained and veteran admirals and generals, the complete annihilation of the Pacific and Baltic fleets (Warner 2004), the defeat of the defense forces against a perceived lesser opponent. Although the Battle of Nanshan was a remarkable triumph for the Japanese Empire, it enabled for Japan the contagion of the most deceitful of all maladies: triumph malady. Overly assured in the methods and strategies used and taking for granted most of the lessons to be gained from the attacks, Japan went on being overconfident with its impregnability, assured that the willpower of its armed forces were sufficient to seize what the Empire wanted (Warner 2004). This essay will discuss the battle strategies and tactics of Russia and Japan at the Battle of Nanshan, as well as the political climate at the time, the military leaders, and the final outcome of the battle. II. Russian and Japanese Battle Strategies at the Battle of Nanshan To start with, the general power and strength of the Russian naval forces was more superior to those of Japan, but the flotilla of the latter was in home waters, whereas the Russian fleet was separated between the Pacific and Europe. Evidently, the Russian military manpower surpassed that of Japan, but the former was battling thousands of miles from home and the opponent was fighting within hundred miles from home (Steinberg et al. 2005). The Japanese were highly trained in Western military tactics and strategies, and were painfully disciplined and capably supervised. The Russians were undisciplined, incompetent, and were hindered by ill-equipped officers and obsolete military strategies (Steinberg et al. 2005). The resources of Japan were far more inadequate than those of Russia and the former had to achieve an immediate victory before the entire force and power of Russia emerged. Thus, Japan embraced the enormous risk of initiating armed forces movements at once, before the flotilla of Russian at Port Arthur had been obliterated (Warner 2004). The strategy of Russia was to postpone and deter final response until it had mustered its strength. Basically, the Battle of Nanshan was fought between a developing Asian superpower and a European imperialist. After the triumph of the Japanese at the Yalu River, General Yasukata Oku’s Second Army arrived at the Liaotung cape, quite near to Port Arthur (Steinberg et al. 2005). The Second Army was composed of roughly 39,000 combatants. Arrival was finalized by May 1904
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“The Battle of Nanshan Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1425618-the-battle-of-nanshan
(The Battle of Nanshan Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“The Battle of Nanshan Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1425618-the-battle-of-nanshan.
Battle of Leipzig. The 1813 Battle of Leipzig, which is also known as the Battle of Nations, marks the high point of the German ‘War of Liberation’. It also marks a time of cooperation and coordinated efforts among the various European nations against Napoleon Bonaparte.
Principles of War: The Battle of Waterloo “Principles and rules are intended to provide a thinking man with a frame of reference”. Karl Von Clausewitz Introduction: The theory of warfare entails the use and application of various strategies which help in gaining supremacy regarding, or preparedness of, one's physical forces and offers a significant material advantage at the decisive moment, on a battle field.
In 1969 Mohammed Siad Barre became Somalia’s leader via a military coup. Following a lengthy and tough regime, Mohammed Siad was dethroned in 1991 January through an alliance of rival clans branded as the United Somalia Congress. This paper will therefore discuss in details and analyze the events that led to the Battle of Mogadishu (Bowden 5).
The battle, fought between 16th April 1945 to 2nd May 1945, was of great importance for Germany and the Soviet Union. The battle ended in the victory of the Soviet Union bringing an end to the Hitler’s third Reich. During the war, the Red army not only destroyed the main infrastructure of Berlin but also outnumbered the German forcers everywhere.
This widely known battle represents numerous theories and policies of the operational military science as carried out by Napoleon, like ‘envelopment and placing forces behind the enemy astride his lines of communications’.1 In the Battle of the Bulge, the Germans tried to disrupt the communication lines of the Allied forces to completely immobilize them.
In order to free the French territory and regain superiority, they took an offensive against the German army. The battle is ranked among one of the bloodiest in the history (Gilbert, pp21-28). The allied forces under General Joseph, the Commander-in-Chief of the French army got together in December 1915 at Chantilly and decided to take offensive against the Germans in French territory.
According to the essay, the battle of Guadalcanal proved expensive for both sides. However, the losses by Japanese were higher as they suffered same, in terms of ground forces, ships and aircraft damages. While the loss of American aircraft and ships was replaced soon, the same was not true for Japan.
us wrestle that cost a number of lives of US force scattered over the period of several weeks until the island was finally secured by American forces. The controversial a troops than those declared and accepted. (History.com)i. The battle of Peleliu was code named operations
Lee had crossed the Potomac River and entered Pennsylvania, thus threatening many major cities in the North including Baltimore, Philadelphia, and Washington. General George G. Meade was the new commander of the Union Army of the Potomac who resolved to
apfrogging which is a military tactic, the opponents planned on using Okinawa which was away from the central Japan and utilize it as an airbase to take over Japan. This battle was considered the most ferocious of the battles ever fought in the pacific region. The US used four
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic The Battle of Nanshan for FREE!