The battle of Antietam between the United States (Union) and the CSA (Confederacy) revolutionized the economic and political scenarios of the Southern and Northern states. This battle was the end result of the economic and political difference in the Southern and Northern state…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
Besides, the growth and development of democratic ideas forced the Northern States to fight against the Southern states which was under the influence of slavery, forced labor and slave trade. The battle of Antietam can be considered as a turning point in history of the struggle for freedom and individual liberty in America. Still, the victory of the Union forces under the direct leadership of Maj. Gen. George B. McClellan proves the importance of military tactics, experience and single minded dedication in the battle field. On the other side, the Confederate forces failed to defeat the Union forces because they did not provide ample importance to military tactics and waited for reinforcement forces. In short, the battle of Antietam led the Americans, especially the African American slaves, towards freedom from slavery and forced labor. The Battle of Antietam occurred on 17 September 1862, in and the surrounding areas of Sharpsburg. The other areas include Maryland and Antietam Creek. The battle occurred between the Confederate forces (Confederate States Army) and Union forces (Union Army) in the American mainland. This battle is generally considered as a turning point in the American Civil War, which ignited the spirit of freedom among the slaves, especially the African Americans in America. The Confederate side was led by General Robert E. Lee, and the Union Army was under the direct control of Maj. Gen. George B. McClellan. ...
Besides, the Battle of Antietam was a single-day battle but it resulted in high casualty. Both the opposing sides were forced to suffer heavy loss because thousands of deaths were reported. But the lack of planning related to warfare techniques hindered the Union Army from destroying the Southern Army. To be specific, Union forces possessed enough resources to destroy the Southern side. But lack of planning from the side of McClellan helped the Southern Army to have ample time to withdraw from the battlefield. Eventually, the Southern forces withdrew from Maryland to Virginia. On the other side, the Southern side’s decision to withdraw from Maryland helped Abraham Lincoln to announce and implement the decision to prohibit slavery and free the slaves in America. So, one can see that the Antietam Battle eventually led America to be a unified federation, which is against slavery and in favor of democratic ideas. Some of the resources used in this work include: Battle of Antietam: The Bloodiest Day by Ted Alexander, Grant and Lee: Victorious American and Vanquished Virginian by Edward H. Bonekemper, and Historical Atlas of the United States, with Original Maps by Derek Hayes. Review Strategic Setting: As pointed out, Antietam Battle ignited the spirit of democratic though and changed the general opinion on slavery and forced labor. The immediate cause of the battle is interconnected with the clash between the southern and Northern states in America on slavery, forced labor, and slave trade. Stephen W. Sears claims that “The realities of Antietam were brought home to the Northern citizenry more vividly than any previous battle” (Sears 2003, 20).1 The
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Ellison, through the protagonist of his fiction, communicates the very message that the notion might is right certainly prevails everywhere in the world, escaping from which is mere the fool’s dream. The novel also indicates the secret activities performed by the so called human rights activists in the name of justice and equality for all.
This number is arguably more than four times the number of soldiers killed on the D-Day. This is also more than twice the number of those killed during the 9/11 terrorist attacks on World Trade Center that left about 3,000 people dead. James M. McPherson, a very famous Civil War Historian argues in his book, Crossroads of Freedom: Antietam that this battle changed the course of Civil War.
According to the essay, the battle of Guadalcanal proved expensive for both sides. However, the losses by Japanese were higher as they suffered same, in terms of ground forces, ships and aircraft damages. While the loss of American aircraft and ships was replaced soon, the same was not true for Japan.
While the two may have similarities in their theme and size (their scales are huge) there are however stark differences between the two artworks that include background, style, medium and circumstances. Antonio Del Pollaiyolo’s Battle of the Nudes or Battle of the Naked Men may have been engraved between 1465 to 1475 by the Florentine goldsmith and sculptor Antonio del Pollaiuolo.
The battle took place between the Persian army and the citizens of Greek cities of Athens and Plataea in 490 BC (Green 36). The battle was aggress by the Persian king Darius as a reaction to the involvement of Greek cities of Athens and Eretria in Ionian revolt, which was aimed to overthrow the Persian rule.
This paper has discussed the events that led to the actual battle as well as distributed the same in three spans, starting from the morning, peaking at mid-day and talking a bit about the afternoon session. The aftermath of the war will also be discussed
These commonalities add up to give the viewer a depiction of war that is steeped deeply in the human emotion of glorifying past historic events to reflect a modern interpretation of ancient warfare. This romanticized interpretation of war and battle is
This difficulties forced people to form decolonization social movement to kick out the colonists.
On the other hand, the battle of the Algiers is a movie based on true story that took place in Algeria between 1954
The battle brought an end to the reign of Plantagenet in England and paved the way for the Tudor kingdom. This essay tries to prove that the Battle of Bosworth Field, as depicted by William Shakespeare, is in truth an unsightly tale of violence and despair, not a theatrical depiction of heroism or courage.
The report intends to analyze mission command during The Battle of the Marne, the first battle of the World War I that took place between the 5th and 12th days of September in 1914. This battle resulted in one of the Allied victories against the German Army under the command of Chief of Staff Helmut von Moltke.
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Antietam Battle Analysis"
with a personal 20% discount.