This paper will examine how public opinion in the United States influenced the decisions made in Washington during Johnson’s years. The paper examines a number of opinion polls conducted by Gallup during the Johnson’s era which would shed light on the issue of media’s impact upon Johnson. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Vietnam War vs. the Great Society: To What Extent Public Opinion Affected Lyndon Johnsons Decision on the Guns vs. Butter Dilemma"
Download file to see previous pages
According to the study conducted Bernstein writes that Lyndon Johnson’s presidency had started with the catastrophe of John Kennedy’s assassination and closed in the mire of the Vietnam War. This short sentence, however, embraces five painful years of turmoil, racial conflicts and riots, student unrest, and to cap it all, demonstrations by the war opponents. This period is considered a highly trying time to be a president, especially of the United States in their capacity of a leader of the free world, as well as the standard of democracy and rule of law. On the other hand, President Johnson appeared to be somehow tragically short-changed – according to Bernstein – being inevitably charged with the wrongs, he has never been credited with the rights of the then internal and international situation. The aforesaid might account for the fact that Lyndon Johnson is ranked relatively low among the American presidents. Nevertheless, his presidency is believed to have started more or less successfully – having won a landslide victory over Barry Goldwater in 1964, which had given him a comfortable Democratic majority willing to work with him, Johnson took the responsibility to unite the nation after the Dallas assassination and persuaded the Congress to enact his massive legislative program, which gained popularity as the Great Society program – a term coined by Johnson in a speech at the University of Michigan in 1964. 6. By that time, Lyndon Johnson was beginning to become more and more involved in a conflict, which, in actual fact, had begun nine years earlier, namely in 1955, and which, according to Lunch and Sperlich, was of little concern to two-thirds of the American people7. Thus, the choice between guns and butter, or in other words between investment in public goods and defense - a dilemma which is thought to have emerged at some point in the twentieth century - appears rather characteristic of Lyndon Johnston’s presidency. Moreover, while Johnston was a priori constrained by the Cold War arms race, and the Soviet/Communist aspirations to dominate the system of international relations, he strived to achieve a comfortable domestic economic and social climate, which to cater for the Great Society vision. In order to expand on the existing literature concerning the ‘Guns vs. Butter’ metaphor, this paper will examine how public opinion in the United States influenced the decisions made in Washington during Johnson’s years. The paper also attempts to assess the degree to which Johnson’s decisions to escalate, or seek a negotiated end to, the Vietnam War could be seen as a reaction to American public opinion; as well as the extent to which the lack of public support for the conflict in Southeast Asia overshadowed Johnson’s efforts to build the “Great Society”, and contributed to a deterioration of his public image. In doing so, the paper examines a number of opinion polls conducted by Gallup during the Johnson’s era, as well as articles of The New York Times, which would shed light on the issue of media’s impact upon Johnson. The newspaper articles would also present a clue in the change of public perceptions of failure and success during the Vietnam War, the progress and evolution of the anti-war movement, and the recognition, or lack thereof, in Johnson’s attempts to build the ‘Great Society’. South Vietnam in 1964 – a Limited war for Limited Objectives The number of American military advisors in Vietnam had already been increased to about 16 000 by 1963, and according to Dallek, although President Kennedy appeared willing to commence withdrawal after his reelection8, the American involvement in what the general public considered by then a civil conflict in a faraway country was more or less a fait accompli. In marked contrast to Lyndon Johnson’
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
(“Vietnam War vs. the Great Society: To What Extent Public Opinion Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1396571-vietnam-war-vs-the-great-society-to-what-extent-public-opinion-affected-lyndon-johnsons-decision-on-the-guns-vs-butter-dilemma
(Vietnam War Vs. The Great Society: To What Extent Public Opinion Research Paper)
“Vietnam War Vs. The Great Society: To What Extent Public Opinion Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1396571-vietnam-war-vs-the-great-society-to-what-extent-public-opinion-affected-lyndon-johnsons-decision-on-the-guns-vs-butter-dilemma.
Vietnam War, like many other wars of its era, was fought to prevent the spread of Communism across Asia. Usually referred to as the Second Indochina War, Vietnam War was the longest military battle in the history of United States and lasted from 1959 to 1975. It was fought between the North Vietnam (Communist) and South Vietnam (United States).
It is believed that United States has again entered a foreign quagmire from which it is unable to withdraw without causing some heavy scars to the American psyche- not to mention severe damages to the economy, military assets, American soldiers etc. However proponents of this invasion fail to acknowledge any similarity between the two conflicts.
A project should be introduced for enhancing the development of a unique training program that meets specific criteria in terms of its cost, its duration and its quality (Olateju, Abdul-Azeez, & Alamutu, 2011, p.1). Evaluation of project – Methods In general, the evaluation of projects has three key parts: a) the identification of costs, b) the identification of outputs and c) the comparison of the findings related to the previous two phases (Marieta, Opreana & Pompiliu 2010, p.132).
As the report stresses the main concern of sociology of education is thus a close study of public school setups in the modernized and industrialized society. Sociology of education deals with what may unswervingly or indirectly have an impact on education. The matters that may concern education should be sociological in nature.
This also calls for vibrant human resources [HR] management practices, since highly performing employees are a direct result of competent and competitive HR practices. The same makes it also obvious that it is expedient that an organization uses its resources to produce optimal performance and to ultimately heighten organizational profitability.
The approach is based on the concept that if financial statements cannot be prepared correctly, then financial statements must be presented in such a manner so as to reflect useful information focusing on users and the decision problems that they face. The approach assumes that if the financial and accounting is useful to investors, then trading volume of stocks should experience a surge and securities prices are also expected to increase or respond in predictable manner relative to publicly available accounting information (Schroeder, Clark and Cathey, 2011, p.43).
This essay discusses that compared to the public sector’s programs, the training program suggested for the organization would have such advantage: it would be easier for each employee to talk to the firm’s owner. In public sector, politicians have the role of CEO of large organizations. In the private sector it is easier to visit the firm’s CEO and discuss on all critical employment issues.
The fact that the public sector if government controlled, means that the element of growth is limited to the regulations, which are imposed or implemented by the government. To ensure this is changed it is essential to alter certain ideologies in
The public sector and private sector describe two main types of business. These two sectors provide similar services on some levels, but they differ from one another on a number of issues, which include ownership and objectives.Though there are similarities between the two sectors, there are also differences between the public and private sector
A public defender is a lawyer who is employed by the government and is charged with the duty of representing people who are charged, but can not afford the services of private defenders. A private defender is an attorney who is involved in a private practice and is
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the research paper on your topic
"Vietnam War vs. the Great Society: To What Extent Public Opinion Affected Lyndon Johnsons Decision on the Guns vs. Butter Dilemma"
with a personal 20% discount.