Marzili reckons that death penalty has been used over the years by different societies across the world as a punishment methodology aimed at deterring possible or would-be-criminals from committing unlawful actions. He also notes that it has particularly been applied when one is convicted of murder. …
Download file to see previous pages...
Marzili observes that Criminologists, Lawyers and other practitioners have over the years tried to analyze and study the rate at which murder declined after murderers are executed but there have been no authoritative conclusive results. In 1973 however, Isaac Ehrilch research carried in the United Sates showed that for every one inmate executed, seven lives were spared as potential murderers were prevented from committing such crimes. The results were similarly observed by his disciples. For those who support capital punishment, the likelihood of tangible results not being felt, they argue, is as a result of lack of swiftness in executing the convicted culprits. For this MSU authoritatively asserts that:
‘’The fact that some states or countries which do not use the death penalty have lower murder rates than jurisdictions which do is not evidence of the failure of deterrence. States with high murder rates would have even higher rates if they did use the death penalty’.
Indeed, others have supported the argument citing that it is preventive in the sense that people in general fear death more so death that is planned and decided by the courts. Even more interestingly is the fact that death penalty against a murderer would prevent him from committing any other offence ever and thus seen as a permanent deterrent measure. Further, these executions take approximately forty days before they are conducted. But one issue that begs the question why should the convicted be made to wait on death row?
Why long wait in death row While the death penalty is seen by many as just, some people have argued that often times those convicted of murder and sentenced to death are put on wait for too long. This is more compounded by the cost incurred as any investigation relating to death penalty usually costs three times more than a non-death case (Marzili 50). When one is convicted and sentenced to death, they are usually put on death row during which time the state expends housing, health-care and food costs on them. However, some of the reasons which have been cited for long death row are many and how that affects the cases have some moral standing (Marzili, 58). First, if the convict becomes sick or ill, then he has to be treated before the execution takes place. Olando (2009) provides a case where in 2003 about $121,025 was spent on a life saving dialysis for a condemned killer who had been subjected to death row for six years. This was the case involving Horacio Alberto Reyes who was convicted of murdering Maria Zetina. He wanted a kidney transplant and argued that this would save tax payers in the long run (Olarndo 8). Secondly, it allows for arbitrary search of any pending justice. Reverend Jesse Jackson had once argued that death sentence is basically an arbitrary punishment. According to him, it does not entail objective templates or guidelines when it should be sought or executed. Therefore, the lack of the objectivity leading to discriminatory practices puts it that whoever is sentenced is allowed humble time to seek redress through an appeal. He further argues that many Americans support of death penalty is anchored on individual propensity to violence, an individual’s criminal history among other factors; parameters
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Death penalty Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/history/1390453-death-penalty
(Death Penalty Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Death Penalty Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1390453-death-penalty.
The Death penalty deters people from committing murders. It can save lives as it acts as a remedy against frequent murders. The death penalty is more human than other forms of severe punishments. By enforcing capital punishment there is the possibility of removing a potential threat to the society.
Opponents of capital punishment argue that there is little evidence to support a deterrent effect, and that any net balance that may be theoretically achieved through its use is offset by a variety of ethical and practical problems.
At the beginning of the 20th century, nearly all countries practiced some form of capital punishment, but it is no longer used in most countries (Stearman, 2007). The benefits and drawbacks of the death penalty are debated widely. Can it ever be justified?
Due to the nature of the death penalty, which involves one person being put to death by another, many people have doubted as to whether or not the death penalty is the most moralistic way to go about making a point. The death penalty has evolved immensely over time, but the intentions remain to be the same.
On one side of the issue, the death penalty is based on the concept of an ‘eye for an eye,’ and that one should receive the corresponding punishment for one’s actions. On the other side of this issue, the death penalty is considered an inhumane and a harsh punishment to implement within an imperfect criminal justice system.
Examples of this are ritual human sacrifice, physical torture that is condemned by many nations worldwide and slavery that has been abandoned largely. Relics of these practices may go on, but those are anomalies that go on to underscore the facts that the world is turning against these evil practices.
Can any procedure bring them back to life? Can any compensation make good the irreversible damage done to the immediate family members and the society at large? Does the Government have the divine powers to create life? So, it cannot exercise
Imposition of the death sentence does not necessary mean that the offender will be executed since there is a chance of appeal or even commutation to life imprisonment.
This paper, therefore, tries to answer the question: should
Various states have had their opinions about death penalty with some upholding it while others scrapping it from the laws. However, there exists no general agreement as to whether the death penalty is an effective punishment to deal with
These reasons include murder, rape, adultery, arson attack, terrorism and so on. The justice systems in various countries have analyzed the reasons for penalizing the criminals. The analysts have found discrimination in terms of class, race and gender
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Death penalty for FREE!