Objectives of Medical Checkups Arises - Case Study Example

Name Institution Course Date Introduction For quite some time, the Australia has been conducting serious debates on health care reforms but since then, little has been discussed on community health centers that were once well established under the leadership of president who in 1965 initiated a network primary provision of healthcare services to all Australia citizens (Adashi, Geiger & Fine 2047). For a long period of time, Australia has been in the forefront on ensuring that primary healthcare services provision is able to sustain people’s lives from wherever they are and at any time the need for medical checkups arises (CHCs). However, there have been ups and downs on establishing a unique system that addresses issues in the Australia. Objectives of CHC From the beginning, the Australian president suggested that there should be an equal access to medical services by all citizens. Since its establishment in the 1965s, the president of that time initiated a program that could ensure that all Australian citizens have a reliable and affective medical services provisions system at their disposal. As such, he championed that, putting up of many health centers had a capacity of alleviating poverty while addressing poverty and health related issues (Medical Malpractice Reform 5). For similar cases in US, several CHCs were constructed and equipped in Boston and rural Mound Bayou which is then Mississippi and the main objective of the project was to curb and mitigate health disparities that had encouraged ethnicity (Adashi, Geiger & Fine 2049). It was long noticed by presidents and community activists that many people who were rendered poor did not have an access to sustainable health or medical services (CHCs). Roles of Medical practitioners Medical practitioners are key stakeholders in the medical services provision setup. These are fully trained individuals who are required by the government to give health services to communities and to all groups of people regardless of race, age, ethnicity and gender (Adashi, Geiger & Fine 2050). According to the Australian reforms that were put into place during the 1965s, there were several proposals and allegations that were put forward by the American congress and under the direction of the federal government which was directed by the then superior constitution. The main current reforms on healthcare however has not factored in the idea of providing community healthcare systems with more funds to buy new equipment (Health Care Reform 10). In addition, the reform has not clearly outlined how the CHCs will be operated since there are no provisions that have been laid down to increases workforce in community health centers that currently operate in different states and counties. Whereas there are reforms to increase capacity of nurses and medical providers in national hospitals, there have been no reforms that have been directed towards increasing the number of workforce in community health centers (Mechanic 45). The first intention by the government was to enable poor citizens and uninsured citizens to have an equal opportunity of getting attended to by medical providers as well as getting sustainable medical services (Medical Malpractice Reform 25). Current Reforms There are increasing calamities that have and are seriously affecting livelihoods at different stages of their lives. Technological advances, scientific explorations have both mitigated disease causing avenues but again, they have increased vulnerability of people to contract cancerous related and associated diseases (Mechanic 2). Much of the pollution results from combustion of fuels in the transportation sector by automobiles. The current reforms have been directed at ensuring that the number of practitioners increases in national hospitals and federally owned research medical and research centers. The number of nurses, surgeons, and medical practitioners working in the public sector has not been enough to meet the rising demand that is continuingly being experienced in different medical provision centers and hospitals. The reforms have also called for IT experts to protect patients’ information from public domain by providing log in detail. Through this, the reform has based their move on privacy measures which ensures that no unpermitted member has an access to a patient’s information because it can lead to frustration and stigmatization of victims (CHCs). The reform has also called for effective management of patient’s information based on what the government call as patient and medical provision strategies of the century (Mechanic 23). This reform outlines that patients should be enabled to log in their details to have an access to their medical record at any time they may so wish without having to travel for long distances to health centers (Adashi, Geiger & Fine 2048). Within this context, federal government has called for reforms to be undertaken so that data is protected from access by storing the information in clouds through application of cloud technology. Despite this, there have been no direct means through which increase in number of nurses and other medical practitioners in community health centers has been addressed in the reforms (Mechanic 25). There have been several allegations that have put forward to indicate how there are variations between the workforce in national hospitals and in community health centers. For the last about 10 years, the federal government has not paid a close attention to address problems that are currently affecting community health centers. It is uncertain that the number of patients in communities is daily increasing yet there have been no measures recruit more medical practitioners. Medical service provision has not been given an attention in the contemporary world because levels of unemployment among the citizens and American citizens is rocketing hence leaving a great number of people in strenuous financial scenarios which renders them poor or not able to access medical insurance (Mechanic 34). The question that currently remains in the medical care provision with regard to community health care centers is that quality of medical service provision is continuously reducing and there is no reform that has been enacted to address the shortage. This situation has rendered many of Australian communities unable to get and manage a health care service checkup timetable. Who will save the poor communities is a serious question that underlies the medical setup in Australia. It is not valid and of good approach when the government says openly that CHCS should survive on grants. Grants are meant for improving the quality of medical provision services but should not be seen as a quality and sustainability upkeep fund. Strengths of the reform The strength of the current reform is that, it has suggested for the number of medical services givers to be increased in national hospitals and in research centers owned by federal government (Mechanic 7). The provision of additional practitioners will enable a greater population seeking medical treatment and attention at the national level to be attended to. The increase will also ensure that lives of US citizens are sustained for longer lifespan, an approach that will increase productivity of US citizens. Weaknesses The reform has failed to address the challenges that currently face community health centers in terms of shortage in number of medical practitioners, facilities, equipments, drugs, and effective regulations. This is of big concern because most people have been suffering out of their poverty and financial instability (Mechanic 7). The past regulation outlines that no one should be turned away for failing to raise a treatment fee or if he or she fails to submit citizenships. Failing to address CHCs challenges means that poor citizens, immigrants, and less privileged individual will be much vulnerable to diseases and avoidable deaths (CHCs). Implications of CHCs From definition, all patients are required to report and inquire medical information from community health centers whether they have money or not. The policy states that no one should be turned away from the CHCs whether one has enough funds or not or whether they are insured or not. This means that with the increasing levels of unemployment, the CHCs are recording an increase in number of patients seeking for medical services while the numbers of equipment is remaining constant or even reducing. Community medical centers are unique and paramount in the medical provision world since they provide primary and tertiary medical service provision. It was estimated that seen patients out of 10 patients seeking for medical information are poor and have no option of obtaining and getting medical services from national hospitals (Chase 9). Recommendation From the above analysis of the reform above, there are high expectations that changes are required to equip CHCs with effective, sustainable, and long term performance criteria so that primary services are awarded to community members in poor and in societies that have a high number of uninsured people. One of the recommendations would be to increase the amount of funding to CHCs, high enough to equip centers, and conduct research in community research centers. The other recommendation will be to increase workforce and IT data management systems in CHCs to ensure that patients have an access to their past medical data and can also make inquiries via online to check and consult on their medical situation. Failure to address these issues will set gaps in medical services acquisition and provision, a scenario that will lead to deaths among the uninsured and poor citizens. Works Cited Adashi, E.Y., Geiger, J., & Fine, M.D. Healthcare reform and primary care-The growing importance of the community health center. The New England Journal of Medicine 362.22: 2047-2050. Chase, Allen. Fugue for Brass Sextet. Massapequa, N.Y: Cor Pub, 1963. Musical score. CHCs. The implications of health reform for U.S charity care programs: Policy considerations. Viewed 22, January 2014. http://www.chcs.org/publications3960/publications_show.htm?doc_id=1261141 Health Care Reform: The Will to Change. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1996. Print. Medical Malpractice Reform: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Courts and Administrative Practice of the Committee on the Judiciary, Australia Senate, One Hundred Third Congress, Second Session, on a Hearing to Determine Whether Congress Should Federalize a Law in the Health Care Package on Medical Malpractice Reform, May 24, 1994. Washington: U.S. G.P.O, 1995. Print. Mechanic, David. The Truth About Health Care: Why Reform Is Not Working in America. New Brunswick, N.J: Rutgers University Press, 2006. Read More