Tobacco Producing and Processing Companies Against Politics - Essay Example

Module The Opponent of the Policy Such As Tobacco Producing and Processing Companies Are Moving Aggressively Towards Advertising and Marketing Smokeless Tobacco to the Learners. A number of issues have been cited in concern to tobacco producing and processing companies advertising and selling their products. Many of the opponents are against the marketing and selling of tobacco products due to the effects on the people using the products. However, the tobacco companies have been cited to start marketing smokeless tobacco to its users. This has been seen as a counter action in advertising their products in the market. As a fact, many of the opponents of tobacco marketing and advertising have their various reasons. First, smoking tobacco is addictive. This activity affects the uses, as they have to depend on the tobacco products. As such, most of the users find it difficult to halt the use of the products. Secondly, the use of tobacco leads to a number of health conditions. These conditions could be fatal to the users, as they are hardly treated. For instance, tobacco smoking leads to lung infection. This affects the lives of the users, as they have to battle with the effects of addiction. On the contrary, the tobacco producing companies have started marketing smokeless tobacco to its users (Balkin 5). Apparently, the smokeless tobacco still has a number of effects on the users. This paper will focus on the opposing points in concern to the issue of advertising and marketing smokeless tobacco to the users. Becoming an addict is a cognitive behavior that comes unconsciously. When people start using a product, they are oblivious of some of the effects, which include addiction (Lockwood 14). For instance, learners prefer using smokeless tobacco, rather than smoking tobacco. This leads to addiction, since the smokeless tobacco has the same chemical components just like smoking tobacco. In many instances, the learners think that they will not be addicted to smokeless tobacco. Therefore, they feel that this is an appropriate solution to their quagmire. With consistent use of the smokeless tobacco, the learners feel the need to continue using the smokeless tobacco. In many instances, the learners feel the smokeless tobacco is effective, in that it makes them “high” in the meanest time. Since they would wish to feel high at all the times, they continue to depend on the smokeless tobacco (Wand 16). Ultimately, they will find it hard to quit the behavior. Under such conditions, the tobacco firms involved in production and advertising benefit, since they have a constant demand for their products. Consequentially, with continued advertisement and marketing of their products, they gain a significantly increasing market. This is a positive approach by the tobacco producing and advertising companies, as they continue to make profits at the expense of learners who are continuing to use their products. The aspect of smoking tobacco and using smokeless tobacco are different. While the learners have to light tobacco when they need to smoke, they do not need to light smokeless tobacco. This creates a different perception in the learners. The learners are oblivious of the situation, which is not different from people who smoke tobacco. For instance, inhalation of the smokeless tobacco leads to the same health effects experienced by people who smoke tobacco. For instance, use of smokeless tobacco could lead to lung infections (York and Suzanne 21). This is due to a number of reasons. First, the chemical composition of smokeless tobacco is the same as the composition of smoking tobacco. Therefore, using each of the two products will lead to the same situation. Apparently, in the recent times, cancer is a lethal complication that is claiming the lives of many people in the world. One of the ultimate causes of cancer is using tobacco. For example, many patients diagnosed with cancer of the mouth have been using tobacco for an arguably long period. The dependence on tobacco leads to propagation of cancer causing cells in the body. With continued use of tobacco, the users increase the growth of cancer cells. Over the years, the cancer cells will be increasing, as they multiply. As a fact, the increased use of smokeless tobacco creates an environment that is conducive to the growth of cancer cells. Strangely, the users do not feel any effects of the growth of cancer cells. Therefore, they are oblivious of the current situation, since it is not painful. The users only note the situation when the cancer is past the developmental stages. At this time, the cancer growth is dangerous, since it can hardly be controlled. Some of the patients diagnosed with cancer in the final stages are only given painkillers, as they feel extreme pain. In this case, it is evident that the situation is not rectifiable. Therefore, smokeless tobacco is claiming many people’s lives (Hunnicutt 12). These situations can be rectified, by halting the advertisement of alternative smokeless tobacco. The many people who are addicted will avoid such situations. Similarly, the prevalence of cancer will be reduced to manageable levels. Smoking tobacco affects the people in the vicinity to a greater deal. In essence, smoking tobacco leads to burning nicotine and tar, which leads to production of harmful gases in the air (Hirschfelder 5). It is noted that the emissions are harmful to many people. The people that are mostly affected are the secondary smokers, who are not involved in the smoking act. It is noted that when some people are smoking, they release the gases to the air, which are inhaled by other people who are not involved in the primary smoking. This has affected many people in the world, as they inhale some of the dangerous chemicals. This has led to the introduction of smokeless tobacco, which does not affect the other people in the vicinity. However, the effects of the smokeless tobacco to the primary smokers are enhanced (Sharp 12). Although other people are hardly affected by the acts of smoking, the primary smokers are put in jeopardy of developing a number of diseases. Therefore, this can be termed as a “cobra” effect. This is where a solution to a problem culminates to a worse situation. People who smoke are easily noticed, as they expose physical evidence. For instance, people who smoke exhume a disgusting smell (Chapman 15). Similarly, people who smoke are evidently seen holding smoke, while exhuming smoke. When considering this act, it is easy to annihilate the behavior of smoking, as the users can be taken through rehabilitation. This can be controlled in the meanest time, as the users can be guided and counseled. However, the same situation is hardly seen in people who use smokeless tobacco. It is not easy to notice people who use smokeless tobacco. In such a case, it is not easy to notice people who are derailing from the normal norms of the society, where smoking is branded an unhealthy activity. The people that use smokeless tobacco are exposed to detrimental effects, just like the people that smoke tobacco. Therefore, it will not be easy to take such people through guidance and counseling, as they are hardly caught with evidence of using smokeless tobacco. Such people experience the effects of smoking tobacco when it is late. As such, they are hardly helped in rectifying the situation. Therefore, use of smokeless tobacco is dangerous to the population, although the producers and advertisers are marketing the products. In conclusion, tobacco producing and advertising companies have taken a different approach in marketing their products. They provide an alternative to smoking tobacco products, by advertising smokeless tobacco. Although many people are taking the alternative of using smokeless tobacco, a number of dire consequences can be experienced later in life. For instance, use of smokeless tobacco leads to addiction. Similarly, it may lead to development of chronic diseases, which include cancer and lung infections. Therefore, there is a need to find a better solution, especially when advertising smokeless tobacco to learners. The effects are detrimental, as they will be affected in life. Works Cited Balkin, Karen. Tobacco and Smoking. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Print. Chapman, Simon. Public Health Advocacy and Tobacco Control: Making Smoking History. Oxford: Blackwell Pub, 2007. Print. Hirschfelder, Arlene B. Tobacco. Santa Barbara, Calif: Greenwood, 2010. Print. Hunnicutt, Susan. Tobacco and Smoking: Opposing Viewpoints. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Print. Lockwood, Victoria C. FDA Regulation of Tobacco Products. New York: Nova Science, 2009. Print. Sharp, Katie J. Smokeless Tobacco: Not a Safe Alternative. Broomall, Pa: Mason Crest, 2009. Print. Wand, Kelly. Tobacco and Smoking. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. Print. York, Nancy L, and Suzanne S. Prevost. Tobacco Control. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2012. Print. Read More