The Canadian Health Care Reform - Literature review Example

Lecturer: The Ugly Truth about Canadian Health Care “The Ugly Truth about Canadian Health Care” by Gratzer, David is the article,which reveals the way universal health is a nightmare. Gratzer reveals the way socialized medicine as rationalized health care is headed back to privatization. The transformation of the health care system will result to terrible problems to both the nurses and the patients in the American society. The journal of Gratzer indicates the way the Canadian health system is a terrible issue to all the Americans. For instance, the transformation of the system does not benefit everyone but only causing many problems in the society. For instance, the author presents some cases where the government has failed to insure cancer patients despite the transformation of the health care system. Canadian doctors who have been silent for a long time have now started to speak up because of the complicated nature of the health care reform. The article further argues on the way humans can wait for more than three years whereas the dogs can get a hip replacement within a week; hence the system is deemed imperfect (Gratzer pr. 5). Thus, the Canadian health care system is problematic because of the shrinking access to better health care, and the costs for care reform are high. Thesis of the article: The main argument of the article is based on the way the Canadian health care reform is a problem to the Canadians because of the rising crisis of socialized medicine, rising costs and restriction of the health-care supply by government-run health care systems. Gratzer claims that the Canadian health care reform is ugly because it does not meet the demanding needs of citizens and the reform is a nightmare to the public (Gratzer pr 5). The author reveals some case studies that made him to prejudice the Canadian health care system. For instance, the author reveals a certain case whereby by he stepped into a nightmare in the hospital emergency room. This is where the author presents an example of the elderly people who sat on stretchers and had been there for a long time waiting for admission into the hospital. The environment was not favorable because of bad smell of urine and sweat from the hospital (Gratzer pr. 5). The author recalled about the Canadian health care reform and decided to write on the way the care reform policy is ugly. This is because it does not meet the demanding needs of Canadians. Gratzer also claims on the way public health care reform policy is problematic because of substandard treatment and growing crisis of socialized care. The author provides the evidence on the way socialized care is a problematic in the Canadian health care system. Thus, he presents an example of Dr. Chaoulli who billed patients directly, which is illegal. The Canadian legal issues of private practice remains dim because billing directly patients rather than the government is unlawful and so is private issuance (Gratzer 12). Gratzer base his arguments on the assumptions about the way the Canadian health care reform policy can be effective. One of the assumptions is based on whether the American style of health care reform is wrong. Therefore, Gratzer assumes that whether switching to the Canadian style of single payer system can benefit the public or not. In this assumption, he identifies some politicians such as Hilary Clinton who are on board and reveals the way Michael Moore celebrates the virtues of the socialized health care services in Canada. This assumption affects the persuasiveness of the article in a manner that leaves the reader as to whether the Canadian health care reform is effective or ineffective. Hunnicutt (56) argues that the universal health care system is a challenge to the American people because the services are not widespread. Therefore, this assumption reveled by Gratzer can be proven futile or ineffective. The authors acknowledge the objections, which might be made against his claims by offering rebuttals towards the Canadian health care system. This is seen whereby the author proves false on the issue whereby the Americans are profoundly looking for a viable health care model (Gratzer pr.3). Gratzer argues that there is no question as to whether the American primary health care reform, which is a mixture of public and private insurance, can deliver effective care services. This is because over the last decades, the health insurance premiums have doubled leaving many industries such as the General Motors and many others on the brink of bankruptcy (Gratzer pr.3). The increased cost of health care has also hit employees and this is one of the reasons behind the fall of median family income. Hillstrom (32) also refutes that universal health care is not effective because of the rising costs and inequities in the health care system. The logic is used as a persuasive strategy in the article of Gratzer whereby the author attempts to persuade the reader to agree upon his arguments. Thus, the author employs deductive reasoning whereby he starts arguing about his claims on the Canadian health care reform from a general claim to a specific claim. Gratzer starts his claims in a top-down approach manner by narrowing the topic from a general point of view to a specific view. Moreover, Gratzer uses case studies and collects information being observed in order to address the assumptions of his claims. The author employs pathos, logos and ethos in order to convince the reader about his arguments on the way the Canadian health care reform is ugly. First, Gratzer uses pathos in order to appeal the emotions and convince the reader that indeed the Canadian health care system is ugly. By using pathos, the author persuades the reader through appealing his or her emotions. Secondly, the author employs a strategy of ethos in order to convince the reader about his character. This is because of the way Gratzer packs up his arguments across; thus revealing to the reader that he is worth to be listened to by the reader. Lastly, Gratzer employs logos in other words; he logically packs up his arguments in a manner that persuades the logical reasoning of the reader. In conclusion, the author based his arguments on the way the Canadian health care reform is a problem to the Canadians because of the rising crisis of socialized medicine, rising costs and restriction of the health-care supply by government-run health care systems. Gratzer claimed that the Canadian health care reform is ugly. This is because it does not meet the demanding needs of citizens and the reform is a nightmare to the public. Lastly, the author employed pathos, logos and ethos in order to convince the reader about his arguments on the way the Canadian health care reform is ugly. Works Cited Gratzer, David. “The Ugly Truth about Canadian Health Care”, City Journal Summer 2007. Web. February 20, 2013 Hunnicutt, Susan. Universal Health Care. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2010. Print. Hillstrom, Kevin. U.S. Health Policy and Politics: A Documentary History. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2012. Print. Read More