Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/health-sciences-medicine/1632549-organizational-design-culture-and-adaptation-case-module-2
https://studentshare.org/health-sciences-medicine/1632549-organizational-design-culture-and-adaptation-case-module-2.
Organizational Design, Culture, and Adaptation (CASE) Module 2 What were the issues that led to the implementation of theprogram?The purpose of the CARE program can be well defined by its core focus. The program is created as solution to help residential area based care staff to improve the outcomes of children. In this case, the driving forces of the programs include the problem of creating attachments between children and their surroundings, the need to build competencies for individual children, to mitigate trauma and adjust expectations in children development, the need for families to participate in the treatment and care of a child, and addressing the need for enriched dimensions of the environment creating more therapeutic media (Holden, et al, 2005: 135).2. Describe the ProgramThe CARE program was created in 2005 by Martha Holden.
The program was created at the Cornell University Family Life Development Center (CUFLDC). The program was tested and adapted by the Waterford Country School. The structure and model of the program can be compared to the Therapeutic Crisis Intervention model of 1994 also adapted from CUFLDC. The core focus of the program is to improve organizational support and leadership competencies. Additionally, the program aims at enhancing consistency within and across the care staff with relation to how they respond to, react to, and think about the needs of the children within their care setting.
The program is created upon the theory of change which states that staff is viable in handling children issues if it’s able to improve its understanding about child development issues caused by trauma.3. How will the implementation of the program resolve the issues mentioned in the first question?The implementation of the CARE program will resolve the issues mentioned in question one through (1) creating room for children to relate and connect with their surrounding better – e.g. creating attachments with parents, (2) building skills and reliability in children both at home at within the care setting, (3) focusing on the issues that affect the development of children based on their trauma history, (4) creating teamwork between care providers and children’s families in care and treatment provision, and (5) creating more opportunities in the provision of child care within the environment.
The resolution of these issues shows that the program aims at drawing all stakeholders of a child’s life close together for the benefit of the child. For instance, a child traumatic history can be a result of family issues that a care provider may not be able to understand fully from the child’s behavior or anti-social tendencies (Holden, 2009).4. If you were the manager of this program, what would identify as the positive aspects?If I were the program manager for the CARE program, one among the highly regarded competencies of the program is its focus on children competencies.
Competencies in this case mean skills and ability to engage in skill- and knowledge based activities. However, the development of competencies on children is the least of the worries of the program; getting it done is. Thus, by accumulating resources and firing them at the children’s issues forms the foundation of the program’s competencies – evidence-based intervention.5. What changes would you make to improve the program?The provision of care to children with possible trauma histories can be hindered by poor reporting of the actual situations.
Regardless of whether care providers are professional psychologists, it is difficult for the professionals to accurately measure the effectiveness of the program (Liff, 2011). Thus, the focus of the CARE program to associate families with care and treatment intervention requires a more transparent reporting. This means that focus on trauma history may be myopic given the possibilities of ongoing abuse to children and their fear of reporting. Thus, strategic improvements require fool-proof interventions such as the installation of consented surveillance to guarantee family participation and mitigate further abuse (Ghodeswar, & Vaidyanathan, 2007).
ReferencesHolden, M. J., et al. (2010). Children and residential experiences: A comprehensive strategy for implementing a research- informed program model for residential care. Child Welfare, 89(2), 131-49.Holden, M. J. (2009). Children and Residential Experiences: Creating conditions for change. Journal of Social Sciences.Ghodeswar, B. M. & Vaidyanathan, J. (2007). Organisational Adoption of Medical Technology in Health Sector. Journal of Services Research. Gurgaon: Oct 2007-Mar 2008. Vol. 7, Iss. 2; p. 57.Liff, R. (2011).
Promoting cooperation in health care: creating endogenous institutions. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 6(1), 46-63.
Read More