ACL Injuries Prevention, Rehabilitation and Risk factors - Research Paper Example

ACL Injuries Prevention, Rehabilitation and Risk factors ACL Injuries Prevention, Rehabilitation and Risk factors Introduction Several, studies have been evaluating the efficacy of different training exercise training programs I patients with injury. Exercise program conducted thrice a week with three sets of repetitions. Patients are dividing into two groups. A desired goal of rehabilitation is amelioration of knee function. Current research on ACL suggests that causation is likely multifunctional.

Commonly used knee geometry is a notch width index. Gender differences in tibial geometry may contribute to the fact. The current research on ACL injuries suggests that their causation is multifactorial, identifying risk factors is crucial in the attempts of predicting which individuals are more susceptible to the injuries. Commonly used measure of geometry is the notch width index; it takes into consideration the dimensions of the distal femur allowing ACL to pass. An individual NWI is not controllable risk factor for the injury, maintaining BMIS may reduce the risk associated with a narrow NWI (Bisson, 2010).

There several techniques used in preventing ACL, a study conducted by Bert Madelbaum, Holly silvers et al. Showed the effectiveness of proprioceptive training, they developed a program called PEP which focused on aiding the-forward mechanism. He tied to improve the body the body abilities to anticipate external factors to stabilize the joints. Gilchrist conducted a similar study; he explained potential prevention strategies for the injuries in sports. The program was completed three times per week during the regular season; the results presented suggested that the PEP program of neuromuscular was effective in preventing the injuries.

Other tests have been done on proprioceptive training exclusively with balanced boards; the program was implemented in five phrases balance exercise without board, alternating single leg on a square board and other, several boards. The corrected by the control team indicated the training was helpful in preventing injuries. Graichen et al conducted on functional knee bracing, he used ten right cadaver knees to study the strain pattern of knees ligaments. He also measured the knee strains from 00 to 1000 using 200 intervals.

The observation primed the conclusion that a knee brace may add mechanical protection to the ACL and may help to offset knee laxity. Deficiency in stability, ROM of lower extremity and leveled of functions of the main concerns in patients with the injury muscles are weakened especially quadriceps. The aim of rehabilitation program is to enhancing the strength and capabilities of thigh muscles and providing a desirable, functional level of mobility (Sterett, 2006). Not only rehabilitation has an impact on- surgical ACL injury, it can also have efficient effects on the recovery process after ACL reconstruction.

A survey conducted exercise training programs in water and on land patients with ACL reconstruction participated in this study and was divided into traditional and pool rehabilitation groups.Conclusion A study compared ACL- injured men with age- matched; adults less than 55 years, they found that LTP slopes were a significant predictor 0f the injury. The same research suggested that ACL injured men had a significant deeper LTP and MTP than their counter parts. The application of non-centric knee brace leads to reduction of ACL tension the outcome is dependent on the flexion of the knee.

On the other hand, traditional group had reestablished of range of motion of the knee and quadriceps femoris strength to an adequate level.ReferenceBisson, L.J., Gurske-DePerio, J. (2010). Axial and sagittal knee geometry as a risk factor for no contact anterior cruciate ligament tear: a case control study. Arthroscopy, 26(7), 901-6.Sterett WI, Briggs KK, Farley T, Steadman JR. (2006) Effect of functional bracing on knee injury in skiers with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective cohort study.

Am J Sports Med. Oct;34(10):1581-5. Epub Jul 26.