Distributive Justice CS4 - Case Study Example

Todd’s family was very concerning about his health and vowed to do anything they could to make sure he survived. It was not long they began putting up adverts all over the country seeking to get a donor. Within a short time, a donor came by and a liver transplant was carried on Todd. It was a big relief to his family but their happiness could not last long. Todd had received his liver unethical by skipping a very long list of people all who hoped to get a donor. The list of all patients waiting for liver donations was run by the New York network for organ sharing (Miller & Truog, 2008).

The organization was quasi-public based organization that was situated in Richmond. The network was operated on the basis of a grant from the branch of wellbeing and human services (Miller & Truog, 2008). The list was operated on the basis of fairness’ and equality to ensure all patients would be accorded same treatment when it came to organ sharing. Todd had skipped seventeen thousand people who were before him in the list, an act that was strongly condemned (Spicer, 2008). It would be notable to know that some of the queuing patients in the list were sicker than him and hence more deserving than Todd.

The strategy Todd’s family used was advertising in every possible way they could with the hope that a donor would donate directly to his family. This was unethical as they ought to have encouraged Americans to donate more for the benefit of everyone in general (Spicer, 2008). Todd had used an unjust means of getting a donor. This act contradicted the whole point of having an organ distribution networking as it implied that only those who were able to pay for adverts would be the only ones benefiting (Spicer, 2008).

Todd had used unjust means to save his life ignoring the principles and rules governing the distribution agency. The doctors were not sure if his transplant would be of much help as his cancer had advanced (Spicer, 2008). In addition, other more serious patients had lacked the opportunity of having a transplant despite being in the queue waiting for long. Todd had manipulated a loophole in the system to save his life. Consequently, the organization of health and human services quickly retaliated to ensure a similar incidence would not occur.

Pressure has been mounted in the organization council and the government as well to ensure fairness and equality for all (Miller & Truog, 2008). Distributive justice entails fair allocation of resources among assorted units of a society. Communities have limited amounts of wealth and resources and ensuring all members of a community feel treated equality and with respect requires rules to govern. One prominent theorist by the name John Rawls has given the topic of distributive justice a lot of weights in philosophical studies leave along social sciences (Howard, Cornell & Cochran, 2012).