Scientific Misconduct - Essay Example

Essay: Scientific misconduct Scientific writing involves a plain writing, based on facts and true elements with accurate description rather than rhetorical flourishes. The writer bases their arguments on an observable scientific approach of a particular element, and not their own thinking and assumptions.a scientific writing should be thrilling and not ‘flat style’. The reader should not get it boring.it is done in plain English, with No native language.(Bird, Stephanie J. 87).Different scientific fields do their scientific writing in their own style.

However, all scientific fields have laid down principles in common, to monitor the writing practice and avoid mislead and the element of to the scholar among other people using their writings.Peer review refers to the cross checking of one’s scientific writing by experts in the field of writing. This is done to prove the originality of the writer’s idea (whether it’s their own idea or a copy of other peoples work). It is also aimed at establishing the worthy of the material and the reality of the writer’s arguments.

The peer review also checks on plagiarism. Peer review is different from endorsements or praise for a work or bookIn various scientific writings, the writer uses their own ideas. However, various r references and consultations are made from already documented works by other writers. Although they use their own ideas, this consultation is very important as far as scientific writing is concerned. The Witter has to make deep research, apart from their own idea, but based on research done by other writers and already documented.

This gives the writer a guideline on the procedure to follow in order to avoid documentation of bias information.The aspect of a writer using already documented scientific writing comes in various ways. The writer may however decide to read the old document, and expand on the ideas and the information there in. This may be referred to as progressive scientific writing. On another perspective, the writer might decide to combine their ideas with the ones already documented to come up with a basically new concept.

In very rare cases, writers have also gone contrary to already documented scientific writings, proving the already documented concept wrong and bias. This has been evident in the field of innovation, where already documented theories have been proved inaccurate and unrealistic.The use of already existing document to come up with a basically new document may come in through citations. It may also involve references and quotations. However, the aspect of plagiarism should be depicted anywhere during these reference.

Plagiarism is the aspect of taking someones words or ideas as if they were your own, be either in writing or even presenting of the originality of your piece of scientific writing (Neville, pg. 43). Plagiarism creates inconveniences to the people using various documented scientific writings, on whose idea was it? This is an illegal act, which one can be fined in a court of law (LaFollette, pg.42). It can be avoided by placing directly quoted words and phrases from a written document in quotation marks and crediting the source.

In conclusion, scientific writing is encouraged in the scientific field of research, but it should be undertaken with keen moderation and procedural manner to avoid inconveniences to the field of science, and avoid plagiarism.Work citedBird, Stephanie J. Scientific Misconduct. Guildford, Surrey, UK: Opragen Publications, 1999. Print.LaFollette, Marcel C. Stealing into Print: Fraud, Plagiarism, and Misconduct in Scientific Publishing. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992. Internet resource.

Woodford, F P. Scientific Writing for Graduate Students: A Manual on the Teaching of Scientific Writing. New York: Rockefeller University Press, 1968. Print.Neville, Colin. The Complete Guide to Referencing and Avoiding Plagarism. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2010. Print.