Social Ill and Gender Misgivings - Assignment Example

SECTION 1, PART B.

No More Boats Narration by Felicity Castagna and These Wild Houses poetry by Omar Sakr

No More Boats and the These Wild Houses literature works show the exploitation of use place representation through concrete features of the environment and nature's settings in the texts. The place representation is seen in the immediate location where occurrences are sited, and the story's scope is discussed. The writers use place to show and explain the different events sited in various eras, and to depict the multicultural groups and conflicting identities experienced by both characters in their transmutation Parramatta by the two pieces of literature.

No More Boats interconnects four distinct account views that occurred in a short time within two important chronological occasions. Castagna’s story dwells more on the local and exact region. The story is set in its transcending situations among the native and global, involving the Australian household in Parramatta consisting of many nationalities origin, the Italian-English Martone family, and the numerous conflicting situations they suddenly faced. The story continues to induce various critics referred to as ‘geopolitics’ by Elizabeth McMahon of Australia as an ‘island continent’ and the unsuitability and evasion of the country’s shore frontiers. 'Too many boats' writes Castagna's. This is an indication of a constant occurrence that has been happening now and then since they can remember.

The text explores the representation of place to depict their importance in specific eras when and where particular events of significant impact to the country occurred and a comparison to the repeat of similar events happening in recent years. For instance, the Tampa crisis of August 2001 in Australia, and the 9/11 ambush in the USA concurrently happened. The narrator clearly showed Clare's father having cultural misplacements crises and refused to acknowledge his native culture, and emphatically proclaimed he was an Australia. He denies his children aware of their origin and native cultures. European refugees and assisted-migrants from the late 1940s to the 1960s were stimulated continuously to embrace the "Australian way of life" and spread out in the society'. Before his alighting in Australia's harbors, Antonio exercises the unfamiliar tongue… English words in his mouth' and meditates about his new identity. His movement all over Italy results in conflicting self-awareness, painful reckoning, which made him feel empty. The narration depicts the challenges of expression faced between Francis, Clare, Rose, and Antonio due to their multiple cultures. Their mixed chronicles present a challenge to establish a collective identity, and it's hard to express themselves to each other. Having falsely viewed and wooed each other through the lens of racial cliché – his 'Italian swarthiness,' her 'daughter of a white Rose' birth – Antonio and Rose abruptly gets in a position bereft of a tongue to communicate with each other equally and comfortably

Castagno narrative generates productive and mortified eras as she presents the existence and worries of the Parramatta habitants coping with their distinct ethnics, customs, tongues, skin color, and tribal history (Devasahayam190). Rhetorically thinking, the Parramatta River is symbolically represented as a site for motion and change constituting a nutritious land but at the same time damaged. It also shows home as a place where migrants are distressed and dissatisfied due to their multicultural identity conflicted feeling and notions. The book calls on the readers to scrutinize their connection to sites and find their identity. Castagna's consequently recognizes the complication of various areas and an individual's connection to the city (Devasahayam 190). No More Boats is an essential narrative for an area that is conflicted with its conviction worries of whom it is and where it emanated.

On the other hand, Omar Sakr summons the reader to enter areas and ranges that skip from a child's growth to its maturity, home, and exile. The house is represented by various notions like a place of love, joy, of intimacy memories, the body in anguish and wants, or a place that one met with their loved ones and enemies in an organized and broken manner. Sakr powerfully depicts location as a carrier Botany Bay, Kings Cross, Ash field. The views, sounds, and smells of the Western Suburbs are shown as the region of different households or common areas but contrasted through careful exploration of migrants’ perception contemplating historical periods rather than the future. Sakr explores the everyday and occasional tribalism, political identities, pain, and trauma the migrants face. He explains about the forgotten oust persons, males, females, and their young ones conflicted between traditions, origins, lands, chronicles as a result of a movement from one area to another adopting different tongues and strenuous work. These people are trying to reckon their identity and origin from the multicultural mix.

Section 2: Question 1

Gender Representation

Gender is the different features that distinguish males and females. Both Leah Purcell and Henry Lawson's in their various versions of The Drover's Wife" of gender compound, due to the harsh and challenging for migrant settlements, the Australian bush from those in urban areas and centers. The attributes portrayed in the text are of a forbearance woman, who is a silent hero but very fierce and aggressive who would do anything to protect her children. The document identifies the different community perceived responsibilities of gender and denotes the feminism's aptitudes when given an opportunity and set free from the judging community.

The female gender is represented as being weak in going out and working for provisions for the family and conventionalized in Australian culture. However, from the energy and the work the bush woman demonstrates, it shows that given equal opportunity with the male counterparts, they can play a similar role. This indicates that gender is socially constructed in the society. The norms on how women should behave in feministic manner as a norm constructed and accepted in the community. She fought a mad bullock that besieged the house for a day. For instance, "she made bullets and fired at him through cracks in the slabs with an old shot-gun". Typically, men are the ones that have to play the role of protecting the family members from any danger, but the bush woman is demonstrating how women can still perform the masculine duties.

The bush woman dresses herself to portray her feminist by pushing the perambulator at her front. The drover’s wife does this to maintain some feminist elements in the society. As a woman, the drover’s wife is supposed to show tenderness towards her kids, which she does not. She loves her children a lot but the unfavorable conditions does not enable her show her tenderness towards them, she also “has no time to show.” The male gender is also represented through the roles they place and the freedom they have. The drover has the freedom to go out for months to look after the sheep. While he is a way, his brother takes some provision once in a while to the bush woman and in turn slaughters one of the sheep for his payments.

Leah Purcell, who retells the story in a more intensive manner, portrays the same gender representations in the reimagined story of the drover’s wife. It tells the story of the struggles of the Australian women during the colonial period. The characters in the story are identified as Molly, Joe and their four children. Molly appears to be in tatters and carrying the gender roles of taking of the children. She goes an extra mile of protecting the children when her husband is a way droving. The harsh surrounding Molly is exposed to makes her to play more roles beyond gender. In the beginning of the story, she appears pointing a riffle to a black man that seemed to be running from something. She does this in protecting her home, a role which is supposed to be played by a man in a typical Australian society.

Demystifying the gender roles and the circumstantial challenges that the women underwent may be presumed as rare which may be unfortunate. Perhaps, the authors were reliant on the imaginable and occurrences pushing women to a demeaned gender from the treatment availed in the community. Leading a humbled life may be different from being subjected to humiliating lifestyle. The woman was subjected to a situation that could not have been but owing to the circumstance, the outcomes were very unfortunate. Gender roles were inapplicable noting that the role changed from a caregiver to the provider. Changes continued even as the roles were relegated without regrets. Thus, the author’s portrayal of unfortunate circumstances that focused on an issue that pre-existed and touched on social ill and gender misgivings.