Pepsi Co bid for quaker oats - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
A current ratio should exceed the 1.0 threshold to be considered sound. A company that has a low current ratio is at risk of defaulting of its debt. The formula to calculate current ratio is current…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.6% of users find it useful
Pepsi Co bid for quaker oats
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Pepsi Co bid for quaker oats"

The current ratio shows the ability of a company to pay off its short term debt. A current ratio should exceed the 0 threshold to be considered sound. A company that has a low current ratio is at risk of defaulting of its debt. The formula to calculate current ratio is current assets divided by current liabilities. In 2000 Pepsi had a current ratio of 1.16, while Quaker had a current ratio of 1.15 in the same time period. Both companies have acceptable current ratio results. The quick ratio is more stringent short term liquidity metric. It is calculated in the same manner as the current ratio with the difference being that inventory is subtracted from current assets. The quick ratio of Pepsi in 2000 was 0.89. Quaker had a quick ratio of 0.87 in fiscal year 2000.
Gross margin is a financial metric that measures the broad profitability of a company. Pepsi had a gross margin in 2000 of $8,595 million. Its gross margin percentage was 61.27%. Quaker in 2000 had a gross margin of $2,240 million with a gross margin percentage of 55.37%. Pepsi’s gross margin percentage is better than Quaker by 5.89% which implies that its broad profitability is superior. During 2000 Pepsi had a net income of $1,572 million, while Quaker had a net income of $309 million. The net margin measures the absolute profitability of a firm. The formula to calculate net margin is net income divided by sales. Pepsi’s net margin in fiscal year 2000 was 11.21%. Its net margin is better than Quaker’s 7.64% result. Return on assets (ROA) measures how well management has employed its assets (Garrison & Noreen, 2003). Pepsi’s return on assets of 8.90% is inferior to Quaker’s metric of 12.30%.
The ratio analysis performed on these two companies’ shows mixed results. The short term liquidity of these two companies is similar with Pepsi holding a minor edge of 0.01 and 0.02 in the current and quick ratio. The broad profitability of Pepsi is better, but the absolute profitability of Quaker is superior. The return on assets of Quaker is much better than Pepsi. Overall based on the ratio analysis Quaker had a better financial performance than Pepsi. The acquisition of Quaker by Pepsi makes sense from a financial standpoint. Buying Quaker will not impose any constraint in the liquidity position of the firm since both companies had similar current asset and quick ratio results. The profitability of Pepsi will be enhanced by the acquisition due to the fact that Quaker’s net margin and return on assets was superior to Pepsi. From a marketing standpoint Pepsi also stands to benefit. Buying Quaker implies that Pepsi by default will acquire new product brands that will enhance the product offering the firm offers to its customers. In terms of operational factors synergies will be created by the two companies joining forces since both firms participate in the food industry. The supply chain of both companies will also be enhanced once Pepsi buys Quaker. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Pepsi Co bid for quaker oats Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Pepsi Co Bid for Quaker Oats Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words)
“Pepsi Co Bid for Quaker Oats Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Pepsi Co bid for quaker oats

Pepsi Co and Coca Cola Stock Analysis

...?INTRODUCTION This report analyses the stock price of two companies; Pepsi and Coca Cola. The report uses the stock price movements of the two companies and then identifies which of these companies yields more returns and which of these companies is riskier. The report also analyses different news that are related to interest rates, politics, industry, companies and international news and how these news impact the firms. Investment concepts are used to analyze which of the company is a better investment option. The report at the end presents the summary of what has been learnt in the report. COMPARING THE STOCK PERFORMANCE OF TWO FIRMS Historical prices of Pepsi co Adjusted closing price...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Promotion Strategy Of Quaker Oats

...?Promotion of Quaker Oats Contents Promotion Strategy 3 Reference 6 Promotion Strategy Promotion is an integral part of the marketing program of a firm. Promotion helps a firm to make it present itself in front of the target market. The present report discusses the various promotional strategies devised by Quaker Oats to make the people more and more aware of its wide product range as well as their own health. In a recent endeavor the firm promoted restaurateur and cook Fabio Viviani's “'Hot' Breakfast” clip which had been designed with the message, 'get women's hearts racing in a good way' in as a tribute to the,” American Heart Month” (Prescott 2013). The firm is known...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Strategic Management: Pepsi co

...Pepsi co. has grown to become one of the largest food and beverage companies in the global market. With a brand portfolio which include brands such as Frito Lay, Gatorade, Mountain Dew, Lipton, and Tropicana among others. Pepsi Co. is the market leader in the chip market with over 60% of the market share and second in the carbonated soft drink sector with 30.8% of the market share. For Pepsi Co. retaining and building their customer base is their most important priority. According to Steven Reinemund, CEO and Chairman, a corporate culture driven by constant change, quality and value have been key drivers in the company’s consistent...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

John Leonard Vs. Pepsi Co

...Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc. Contract Law The case of John R. Leonard vs. PepsiCo Inc. is a very interesting one due to the nature of events that occurred. Although we know the vivid details of what transpired, it leaves a lot to ponder over. John Leonard sued PepsiCo for breach of contract because they did not honor a supposed offer to gift a Military Class Harrier Jet on the submission of 7,000,000 Pepsi points. Based on the facts, the first question that comes to mind is what features would constitute a binding contractual agreement. The features which substantiate a valid offer are mutual and reciprocal intent of agreement, legality of form, capacity to contract, legality of form, legal purpose etc. Based on this...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

Pepsi Co

...Conclusion Report Pepsi Co. has the main mission to become the world’s premier consumer product company and is aimed to grow in all those aspects in the world in which the company is operating. The key vision of the company to achieve is to execute different programs related to the food and refreshing beverages, and excel in the competition against the other mainstream beverage companies, such as Coca Cola Inc. The mainstream products manufactured by the company contain Pepsi, 7-Up, Mirinda, Lays, Quaker, Doritos, Walkers, PJ, and Tropicana. The company became the first official drink-maker to distribute its products in Vietnam. The sales of the company have reached $30.4...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Corporate strategy assignment for pepsi co. company From a strategic perspective, it could be observed that PepsiCo is the global leader in convenient snacks, foods and beverages market. According to Ansoff Matrix, PepsiCo has been using the growth strategy of product development. It has been observed that the company is constantly introducing new products into existing market and this has been the strategy that has helped Pepsi to grow. Some of the popular brands that have been introduced in the existing market i.e. food and beverage includes Mountain Dew, Diet Pepsi, Lays, Doritos, Tropicana, Gatorade and Quaker. The aim of such constant development is to remain ahead of competitors in the market and to enhance the market share by...
10 Pages(2500 words)Assignment

Pepsi a proper and convenient manner, with a focus on the customer needs. The model is called then resource based model (VRIN framework) where it is imagined that in order to get sustainable competitive advantage, a firm must engage in value creation activities utilizing the resources which are valuable, rate, inimitable and non-substitutable. The model is shown below: Figure: Resource based business model used by PepsiCo Pepsi Co. Global Marketing Strategy PepsiCo is a global nourishment and drink organization that is positioned at Number 2 on the planet behind Coca-Cola. Its marketing strategy is essentially to work inside the organization, "Execution with a Purpose" Strategy. Bring Customers in by...
16 Pages(4000 words)Research Paper


...Pepsi Case Study Pepsi Case Study Case Summary This case focuses on the change in the tactics of promotion and advertising that Pepsi has been using for several years. The case states that instead of advertising during the Superbowl, the company decided to award individuals as well as business with a grant amount totaling to $20 million. This amount was to be distributed on the basis of ideas that these organizations and individuals had for making the globe a better region. This money was to be distributed in chunks of $5000 to $250,000. This case even focuses on the method of advertising the company is using in its promotional campaign called Pepsi Refresh. The company...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

Pepsi co

...Pepsi Co. Pepsi Co. History The company known as Pepsi Co. is an American company that started operating during the period of 1965 and since then it has spread all over the world. The company is named on its carbonated drink recognized as Pepsi that was developed during the period of 1880s by a pharmacist recognized as Caleb Bradham (, 2015). Later the name of the drink was altered to Pepsi-Cola and by the period of 1902 the company’s name was changed to Pepsi-Cola Company. At first the company did not perform well as was almost bankrupt by the year of 1931 (Balakrishnan,...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Quaker Oats Company and Snapple Beverage Company

..., the management of c Co. strongly believed that it was right time for the company to consider expanding its operations and production capacity. Despite alarms raised by the Wall Street concerning the cost of acquiring the Snapple, the management proceeded with the acquisition plan. This occurred in 1994 when it paid $1.7 billion in order to take control of the Snapple Company. Besides overpaying for the company’s acquisition, Quaker Oats was found to have violated some fundamental regulations governing mergers and acquisitions. It is because the management lacked the necessary knowledge and skills of running and adding value to the Snapple’s operations. After owning the company for only 27 months, Quaker Oats opted to resale... of...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Case Study on topic Pepsi Co bid for quaker oats for FREE!

Contact Us