Situational Awareness of Shared Leadership in a Self-Managing Team - Dissertation Example

In every organization, members exchange a series of behavioral interactions implicitly. These interactions are always done within a framework of assumptions about values, feelings, beliefs, attitudes, personality types, etc. They are distinct and unique in every organizational context and impact the overall organizational process. The work ethics, objectives, motivation, and process flow are all dependent on this impact to thus form the culture of that organization. (Prasad, L.M. 2006).
The culture thus formed throws its influence on the achievements and the overall progress of the organization. Thus, the study of organizational culture becomes a vital component in the success story of the firm. Till recent times, there were scientific attempts for studying interactional relationships only on a person-to-person basis. However, the illustration on visualization of collaborative science throws light on the complexity involved in multiple communication and visualization.
The research of genomics establishes the need for creating spatial designs and evaluations to afford stimulating collaboration in working environments that are advanced in nature. It stresses the insights of how various levels of team members interact between each other and with new technologies. They all prove that there is no allowance for any organization in terms of the collaborative working environment and success needs can be answered only when these environments are fostered with situational awareness.
Reviews of different authors are gathered and critically analyzed to develop a methodology that can smoothly roll on the different roles and responsibilities of shared leaders:
The sole job of any leader is an achievement. It should be attained irrespective of whether the leader is independent or it is a case of shared leadership. An independent leader has difficulties getting things done by his team. Shared leaders on the other hand have to think uniquely to get the things done within the same time by applying the six factors of able leadership: Responsibility, Flexibility, Standards, Clarity, Rewards, and Commitment (Goleman, D. 2000).