We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Should Teenagers be subject to the Death Penalty - Research Paper Example

Comments (0)
Should Teenagers be subject to the Death Penalty? I. Introduction A. Background and Research Problem Crime is defined as an infringement of criminal laws for which the criminal is subjected to some kind of formal penalty by the governmental authority…
Download full paper
Should Teenagers be subject to the Death Penalty
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
Should Teenagers be subject to the Death Penalty

Download file to see previous pages... Hence, the idea of death penalty as a deterrent to crime becomes quite controversial. Most of the countries have ceased applying death sentences to deter crime. Today, more than half of the nations across the world have stopped death penalty either by rule or through practice. They have reported that death sentence is not a solution to deter crime. The social and economic environment of the criminal directs crime. The first nations to have put an end to capital punishment were Venezuela, San Marino, and Costa Rica in the mid-nineteenth century. Other countries like Yugoslavia, Montenegro Serbia, Turkey and Chile have also abolished death penalties from 2000. Executions are prevalent in China, Saudi Arabia and the United States of America. (The European Union is united against Capital Punishment, 2007). The sentencing of youths who have been convicted of violent crimes to execution again depends on the extent of atrocity of the crime. The Juvenile Courts have long protected most of the young offenders from the full-fledged application of criminal law and have also allowed them to enjoyment of their special rights and immunities. The special rights mainly include protection from publicity, imprisonment only to 21 years of age, no imprisonment with adults, and shelter from the consequences of adult punishment like the loss of civil entitlements, the exercise of adjudication against the juvenile convict in the following proceedings and debarment from public employment. The reason for drafting such rights and immunities is to provide the young convict with guidance and rehabilitation so as to ensure the child’s future as well as the protection of the society. Nevertheless, there are some youngsters who are extremely perilous and do not respond to efforts taken to reform them. The use of death penalty under such circumstances would actually depend on the nature of the crime and on the mental state of the offender. However, giving another scope to the youth to rectify and straighten oneself out is desirable (Laurence and Scott, 2003, pp. 1009-1018). Human rights groups have constantly argued against the death penalty inflicted upon a juvenile offender on the grounds of immaturity and vulnerability of impulse. This has especially taken a positive turn after the mentally retarded people were barred from such penalties (Bender, 2002, p. 20). Public consensus already has spoken against the death penalty for juvenile offenders. For instance, a Chicago survey of 2001 showed that while 62 percent favored death penalty for capital crimes, only 34 percent support the same for the teenagers under 18 years of age. The present research centers on the death penalty inflicted upon teenagers and attempts to argue against the moral and practical viability of such steps taken. B. Problem Statement and Purpose The execution or imposition of death penalty on offenders with mental retardation is against the prohibition of “cruel and unusual punishment” as enforced by the Constitution. The three states of US, Texas, Oklahoma and Virginia have carried out 82 percent of all the death penalties in the nation (American Bar Association, 2004, p. 2). Human rights groups and the director of Amnesty International argue that even the imposition of death penalty on teenage offenders was unconstitutional. Hence death penalty might lead to contradiction of human rights especially in case of children or teenagers despite the adults who might be responsible for the actions of the vulnerable, ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Death penalty
The Death penalty deters people from committing murders. It can save lives as it acts as a remedy against frequent murders. The death penalty is more human than other forms of severe punishments. By enforcing capital punishment there is the possibility of removing a potential threat to the society.
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
Death penalty
At the beginning of the 20th century, nearly all countries practiced some form of capital punishment, but it is no longer used in most countries (Stearman, 2007). The benefits and drawbacks of the death penalty are debated widely. Can it ever be justified?
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Death Penalty
In US, many states still continue with death penalty laws. Supreme Court suspended capital punishment during period 1972-76; however, that was resurrected after that. The paper explores why capital punishment should be abolished. US Death Penalty History The below mentioned table depicts death execution history in last few decades in US.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
The Constitutional question of cruel and unusual punishment and the Death Penalty
In the US, however, this primeval way of punishing criminals is still alive and kicking what with the majority of the states having retained the measure. Often, death penalty cases find their way into the halls of the US Supreme Court by invoking unconstitutionality as a ground, particularly the “cruel and unusual” punishment clause of the 8th Amendment.
30 Pages(7500 words)Research Paper
Has the death penalty in the United States run its course
Does the death penalty serve any purpose in our current judicial system? Criminal executions were first implemented in our society as a crime deterrent to ensure that the offenders cannot engage in future crimes but time has shown that cost, errors, and effectiveness have led many to believe there are alternatives available.
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper
Death Penalty
Examples of this are ritual human sacrifice, physical torture that is condemned by many nations worldwide and slavery that has been abandoned largely. Relics of these practices may go on, but those are anomalies that go on to underscore the facts that the world is turning against these evil practices.
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
Death Penalty
Can any procedure bring them back to life? Can any compensation make good the irreversible damage done to the immediate family members and the society at large? Does the Government have the divine powers to create life? So, it cannot exercise
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper
Death Penalty
Imposition of the death sentence does not necessary mean that the offender will be executed since there is a chance of appeal or even commutation to life imprisonment. This paper, therefore, tries to answer the question: should
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
Death Penalty
Various states have had their opinions about death penalty with some upholding it while others scrapping it from the laws. However, there exists no general agreement as to whether the death penalty is an effective punishment to deal with
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper
Death penalty
These reasons include murder, rape, adultery, arson attack, terrorism and so on. The justice systems in various countries have analyzed the reasons for penalizing the criminals. The analysts have found discrimination in terms of class, race and gender
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Should Teenagers be subject to the Death Penalty for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us