Nobody downloaded yet

The NET (No Electronic Theft) Act: Criminal Copyright Infringement - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
[Instructor Name] The NET (No Electronic Theft) Act: Criminal Copyright Infringement This paper gives a brief introduction to the No Electric Theft Act, its history, salient features and benefits will be discussed which will be beneficial in understanding the basic components and rules that are followed till date…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.1% of users find it useful
The NET (No Electronic Theft) Act: Criminal Copyright Infringement
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"The NET (No Electronic Theft) Act: Criminal Copyright Infringement"

Download file to see previous pages The concerned individuals are either subjected to five year prison or can be fined up to 250,000. This law also raises constitutional harms done by 50%. Before the ratification of this law, copyright infringement applied to individuals or organizations who carried out this act for monetary or commercial profits however after a few incidents, this law was altered on the suggestion of the Congress and it stopped being applied to people who did it for purpose other than the ones mentioned above. This law negated the concept that copyright is done to attain some benefit related to money or commercial profit. However this was not the case, the law emphasized that the reason most people opt for copyright infringement was to receive a receipt, a receipt of anything valuable or even that of other copyrighted stuff. Along with the fines and punishment mentioned earlier, the No Electronic Theft Act also provided an entrance to the criminal accountability where the infringer neither obtained nor expected to obtain any kind of benefit from copyright infringement. ...
If the infringer has made a profit of $2,500 in duration of 180 days by producing 10 or more than 10 copies of the copyrighted material, he will be subjected to five years prison or in the other case affine of $25,000 as far as the individuals are concerned and $100,000 for the organizations. For lawbreakers who tend to repeat the mistake, sentence of 10 year duration has been suggested in the law. With the advent of technology and software, life has become easy and complicated at the same time, complicated in the sense that it has given way to infringers, impersonators, illegal copyrighters etc. Today many copyright companies lose their valuable data and information as well as money due to the prevailing trend of piracy. The innovative digital technology has made it even easier to aggravate the affects of piracy by making duplicate copies which show no sign of imperfection and can be easily distributed and reproduced without any inconvenience. This has resulted in discontented employees, internet users and in the bigger picture, organizations. A similar case which actually gave birth to this law and emphasized on its need was when a 22 year old student was found guilty for providing copyrighted software, songs and movies to the general masses. The individual was penalized keeping in consideration the punishments provided in the NET (No Electronic Theft) Act. He was convicted of earning a profit of $5,000 and was hence sent to 2 years prison on probation period with the application of conditions. This law also has a bad history when it comes to the United States vs. LaMacchia case and also in the case of a student belonging to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who copyrighted for the sake of fun and no to earn money or ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The NET (No Electronic Theft) Act: Criminal Copyright Infringement Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/family-consumer-science/1411997-the-net-no-electronic-theft-act-criminal-copyright
(The NET (No Electronic Theft) Act: Criminal Copyright Infringement Research Paper)
https://studentshare.org/family-consumer-science/1411997-the-net-no-electronic-theft-act-criminal-copyright.
“The NET (No Electronic Theft) Act: Criminal Copyright Infringement Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/family-consumer-science/1411997-the-net-no-electronic-theft-act-criminal-copyright.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Fair use or infringement Copyright in art
...after Obama won the presidential election. Tom Gralish (a blogger) discovered that Mannie Garcia, a freelance photographer, at an awareness-raising event, had taken the photograph.41In 2009, the Associated Press declared that the use of the photograph in the poster required prior permission after which Fairey filed a lawsuit asking for declaratory judgment where he claimed protection for his poster under fair use doctrine that did not infringe copyright. Mannie Garcia contended that he had copyright ownership to the photo and even though he liked what Fairey had done to it, but did not support the act of people lifting materials off the internet for their own use without...
34 Pages(8500 words)Dissertation
Digital Millenium Copyright Act
... of the The Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s Effect on Downloading Music and Films The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) was signed into law by President Clinton in October of 1998. It is a complicated bill, designed to protect copyright holders of software, music, and films in an increasing digital age. An important highlight of the DMCA is that it does not hold the Internet service providers libel for illegally downloaded material that their customers access, but it does require that service providers “remove material from users’ web sites that appears to constitute copyright infringement (“Digital”). Additionally, DMCA created fines for people violating the Act that include up to $25,000 per download in civil court... Users Sued...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper
The 1968 Theft Act
...Introduction The 1968 Theft Act was supposed to come with simplified rules and policies that were meant to eliminate the many dilemmas and confusions that criminal lawyers had faced earlier. Unfortunately, soon after its introduction into the legislation more complexities started to arise. It appeared that most of the concepts that were designed to bring out clarity in theft cases turned out to bring more confusion following the various proceedings that advanced from there henceforth. The most controversial concept being appropriation which had been introduced into the law to simplify things by replacing taking and carrying away. The term was defined in partiality by...
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment
Criminal Liability -Theft and Fraud
...Criminal Liability -Theft and Fraud Liability of any offence should be compulsory. Something not to be questioned. Even more if misdemeanour isn't just offence, but even "real" crime. Theft and fraud are still remote from, for instance, murder, but they lead more deep in the world of transgressions. No one is guilty of a criminal offence without fault. In addition, one must be a the person behind, a perpetrator or a participant in the commission of the offence, with the exception of the endeavour to commit, which is an transgression "sui generis". Since a corporation acts through its officials, it may well be that the directing mind of a corporation is...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Unsolicited electronic messages act 2007
...Unsolicited Electronic Messages Act 2007 The question requires an in depth analysis of the Unsolicited Electronic Messages Act 2007 and a conclusion as to whether the Act has clearly distinguished and demarcated the criticisms pointed out by the EFF. The purpose of the Act has been said to prohibit unsolicited commercial electronic messages so as to ensure that information sharing and communication technologies are effectively used within the New Zealand. Further it has been enacted so as to reduce any costs incurred by businesses which are a natural consequence of the unsolicited commercial electronic...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Criminal Law - Theft
...or disproving the actus (issues of identity) or the mens. Otherwise, a claim of lack of memory will not indemnify Sara since ignorance of the law amounts to no issue. (2) On whether Sara committed a crime of theft where she hid the jacket in her bag and left the store: The conduct of Sara demonstrates clearly, the concurrence of the mens rea and the actus reus. The fact that Sara hid the jacket in her bag is an act (guilty act) pre-conceived (guilty mind). It justifies the definitive ingredients of theft in S.1 [16]. Sara will be criminally liable for the charge of theft under this circumstance. This is an example of a crime held to be...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study
Infringement
...Infringement Question (a).Section10 (2) of the Trade Mark Act 1994 s. A person infringes a registered trade mark if he uses in the of trade a sign where because – (a) the sign is identical with the trade mark and is used in relation to goods or services similar to those for which the trade mark is registered, or, in specifically addressing the question at hand concerning Adam, (b) the sign is similar to the trademark and is used in relation to goods or services identical with or similar to those for which the trade mark is registered, there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public, which includes the likelihood of association with the trade mark. In English statute or case law... , which is open to...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Criminal Law Theft
...Ria’s criminal liability Ria will be liable under the Theft Act of 19681 wherein a person is held to be guilty of theft if he or she “dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it.2 To establish criminal liability in theft, it is necessary to prove two aspects (a) actus reus comprising (a) appropriation of (b) property and (c) belonging to another. The mens rea would consist of the defendant acting dishonestly with the intent to deprive another person of his or her property. Ria may also be liable for fraud under the Fraud Act of 2006 An appropriation of property would occur when a person assumes “the rights of an owner”3 and resorts to “keeping or dealing... stated that...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Authorizing Infringement and Secondary Infringement
...it does not give conditions for making copies but says a playlist can be ‘burned up to seven times’, but for what purpose (Brendan). In the CBS and others vs. Amstrad Consumer Electronics Plc and Other ruling in 1988, the judge ruled in favor of the defendant that it granted the ability for consumers to make copies of tapes onto blank equipment but did not give consumers the right to copy (“CBS Songs Ltd and Others vs. Amstrad Consumer Electronics Plc and Another”), so they were not liable for authorization, though their products were or could be used to infringe on copyrights; the ruling says the defendant was not guilty but he facilitated a means to...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Electronic Communications Privacy Act
...Electronic Communications Privacy Act Electronic Communications Privacy Act Introduction The cyber space is growing dynamically andat a rapid pace, which has resulted in more features, channels of communication and means of sharing resources within the cyberspace. Nonetheless, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) has been slow in capturing the dynamic changes that are occurring (Electronic Privacy Information Center, 2012). Accordingly, there is no legal framework to guide the use of features such as cloud computing and various forms of virtual computing. The above recent developments have altered the cyber space in various ways, which require a legal framework to manage the workings of the new features created... then, it was...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic The NET (No Electronic Theft) Act: Criminal Copyright Infringement for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us