3 pages (750 words)
, Download 1
... Number: Lecturer: Tort Law Question Dayton is en d to some claims in this case. He can claim intentional liability on the infliction of emotional distress since Buster Ballplayer hit Dayton intentionally more so after the game had ended. If the injuries were inflicted accidentally during the game, other forms of claims would arise for example vicarious liability. In this case here was the intent to do the assault on Dayton, even if it could have happened during the game. In proving intentional claim, three elements must be proven by the plaintiff; the intent, a volitional act, and causation (Weaver et al. 53). The intention was clear in harming Dayton, which is enough to establish liability. Also,...