US Military Safe Disposal of Waste Products - Research Paper Example

Introduction The process of product development and utilization results in establishment of waste output. The ification of such output is subjected to various aspects of arguments. Development of products only focuses on the output that is useful in the meeting of the considered interests. Most of the non-useful materials are considered off the usage capacity of the involved products. Such observations render them out of usage in the respective process of production and consumption. There exist numerous aspects upon which they can be subjected into better forms of usage or disposal. However, the decision on adopting such measures of safety remains best vested with the ability of the involved institutions and the subsequent implication of such decisions to the involved stakeholders. The mechanism of disposal remains critical in the description of the process of usage and the ethics that are observed by the involved teams. Various organizations are associated with differing models of waste disposal and management. The military remains among the leading outfits that are challenged with the concern of efficient and safe disposal of waste products. The material labelled as out-of-use under the context of the armed forces outfits may be described as military waste. Currently, a definite description of military waste is not available. However, Merriam-Webster dictionary classifies waste as an action or use that results in the undesired loss of something valuable (Waste). Merriam-Webster dictionary refers to military as being associated with soldiers, arms, or war. Such insights allow for a reflection on the elements that may be critical in the definition of the term. Military waste may, thus, refer to the loss of a renewable resource particularly associated by the armed forces. The interests of this research include the reflection of the depths of the material that are comprised of military waste. It furthers seek to align with the adopted models of disposal as perceived by the military. The military remains among the institution that reflects exceptional usage of artillery and supplies leading to the piling of extensive garbage among the output products. However, the prospective concept of usage remains critical in the development of the subsequent military waste. It is essential to consider the elements that comprise of such waste. Rather than the consideration of armory waste, the maintenance of the military while engaged in an assignment is associated with an increased number of waste products. The focus of the military in respect to the international assignment remains described along the replenishing of the troops with diets and equipments. The resultant waste content is derived from these elements. Additional concerns are associated with the prospective role of the military in the recycle of such material. Apparently, the increased duties and concerns over safety and obligation to serve the nation deprive the troops an opportunity to consider the possibility of recycling (Stern, 979). The possibility of having the waste material undergo through a convenient disposal process remains a liability to the time consideration of the respective military outfits. The lapse of time has witnessed the eventual development of policies that may be considered to be reflecting on the address of the respective piling of non-recycled waste. It remains apparent that the prospective consideration of the military in the promotion of appropriate disposal approaches focuses on both the cost and secrecy of the methods of selection. Developing an insight on the complications associated with the military when perceived as an outfit for the promotion of safe disposal and recycling of garbage remains vested on the extensive classification of its process. The acquisition of the respective materials in the military is treated along a strict concept of confidentiality. The extensive classification of its material is perceived as a measure towards the limitation of the possible information that may be leaked to the enemies. It is perceived that the presence of extensive information on the material under consumption or production under the perception of the military remains critically considered as a weakness when perceived under the concept of safety. The same concern extends on the revealing of their process of recycling or discarding the waste material (Dillon, 2015). An insight on the prospective level of waste output associated to the activity of the military may be visualized via the reflection of annual budgetary allocation under their assignments. The eventual fate of the waste material generated from the respective areas of concerns such as defective automobiles, outfit, training facilities and food products may be regarded to be poorly documented. Methodology The study aimed at considering the aspect of recycling and disposal of military waste as embraced by the disciplinary forces. The process of evaluating the fate of the various products is founded on the classification of the respective materials and the determination of the process that is considered by the forces in their disposal. The eventual focus of the study was aligned along the proposal of possible suggestions on control. The realization of the categorization measure was perceived along the possible description of waste material that may have been associated with the respective military details. The research focused on critical aspects that may define the military waste. Such included the considered description, the quantity and the possible harms that may be associated to the waste. A further reflection on the control measures was, also, considered. The listing of the various aspects of waste was categorized under general perceptions, with classes such as chemicals, artillery and equipments being perceived for various components. The respective findings were anticipated to assist in the evaluation of the possible suggestions that may be directed to the involved partisans. Such suggestions are required to align with the nature of the risks that are associated with the prospective aspects of the singular waste products. Results The list of the waste products associated to the military and its endeavors remains vested on the impact it has on the environment. Chemical waste comprised of oil suggested for automobiles and other models of engines. In some cases, the chemicals were comprised of experimental liquids that were anticipated to develop some artillery material. Additional aspects of chemicals that comprised of waste were deduced from the paintwork that was associated with the respective branding of the military equipments. However, the same may not be argued against the disposal mechanism adopted by the military outfits. A number or the chemicals regarded as harmful were subjected to comprehensive quarantine restriction (United States, 56, A). Little consideration on the possibility of recycling was observed under this category of waste. In some instances, the operation of nuclear energy leaves radioactive chemicals under uncontrolled disposal by the respective military outfit. It is rather difficult to compute the amount of waste associated to the chemical effluents of the military due to the increased sense of classification that is associated to their activities. However, the effect of the respective chemical waste ranges from water, soil and air pollution (Berry, Bailey, and Anderson, 180). They further stand to impact risks on the organism placed under exposure, including humans. The most subsequent aspect of military waste included equipments and electronics. The category comprised of the appliances damaged while in the course of duty, as well as those that are overrun by technology. The military considers these facilities to be listed in the compound dumpsites where they are either packed or placed with little consideration of their input. The disposal of such equipments may be regarded as challenging the concept of secrecy as embraced by the respective discipline forces remains augured on the protection of their equipments (Kamau, 45). The military perceives the scattering of such facilities across its immense fields as a better approach towards their disposal. The sites that are filled with the remnants of the equipments that have ran out of use is codenamed as the grave yard by the members of the various military outfits. Apparently, little environmental damage may be accorded to the process of their disposal (United States, 19, B). However, when the concern of the burn pit is placed into consideration, the effect of the waste is perceived further. The waste is further considered a pollutant to the environment and the climate due to the prospective chemical interaction shared. Food waste remains a central part in the description of the military waste. Apparently, the consumption rate of the military is considered rather high. The eventual waste product associated to such efforts of consumption eventuates into the subsequent disposal of the waste into burn pits. The burning of such as wastes leads to the immediate damages in the atmosphere, as well as air pollution. Such changes can lead to the realization of adverse climate adjustments that may affect the various geographies (Borglin, Shore, Worden and Jain, 60). The same may be argued of the sewage waste that is associated with the biological activities of the respective members of the military. A number of military facilities considered efficient models of dumping these waste through the deployment of sewer treatment facilities and its subsequent disposal into the national systems. Such measures allow for the mitigation of their harms. The combat artillery remains regarded as the most crucial waste that is associated to the military. The waste is generated from the activities of the troops in respect to assignments and training. However, their actions are not considered as critical in the mitigation of the associated risks. The dumping mechanism associated to this model of waste extends to the “ghost” artillery that is associated to the respective activities of the troops. The risk of the artillery detonating and causing harms to the public and fellow military personnel has been registered in various jurisdictions. Annexing the possible harms to the confinement that is associated to the respective activities of national security as perceived by the Department of Defence (DoD) remains critical in the illustration of the considered level of risk (Dexter, 1060). Unfortunately, little is offered regarding the effort associated by the military in respect to the mitigation of the associated risks. Waste products comprised of medical and constructions elements are developed with respect to the contribution of the activities of the troops while in training and duty (US Army, 6). Construction waste piles from the progressive makeshift bases and their eventual elimination presents a sense of demolition waste. Additional effect of such waste is felt upon the engagement of attacks against the military. The crumpled structures are comprised of the waste products that are associated to the discipline forces. Its elimination is usually sidelined as they are converted into scrambles of war. Radioactive waste is usually deduced from the fuels or the output of the respective nuclear plants. The plants are considered as ideal sources of energy to assist in the operations of the military. The disposal of the respective military radioactive waste remains critical in the description of the safety of both the organisms and the environment. The same may be argued about the medical waste that is deduced from the treatment of the injured troop members. However, the nature of classification of information that is associated with the military offers little insight on the disposal mechanisms that are associated to these wastes as perceived by the study (Ruby and Douglas, 56). Discussion The quantity of waste material that is associated with the military may be considered as rather difficult to establish due to the increased secrecy of its activity. The same extends to the nature of disposal that is adopted by the disciplinary outfits. However, a reflection on the publications focusing on the activity of the military suggested a number of areas that may result to the generation of waste as perceived in the results section. The role of the military in the promotion of fair models of waste disposals remains critical in the eventual success in address of the associated challenges. “The military is anticipated to lead in the conservation of the environment through the adoption of safe methods of garbage disposal” (Louisville, 66min). Apparently, two approaches have been suggested to a preference of the respective troops in the address of the waste challenge. Burn pits have emerged as a solution to most of the solid but not toxic wastes. Non-toxic perception of the waste extends from the possibility of being radioactive to the eventual inability to explode. Explosives are detonated prior to being disposed of in a manner that is perceived to promote the “safety” of the military personnel. Arguing against the essence of such interests may not be considered viable due to the increased sense of secrecy associated to the activities of the troops. However, two common approaches towards the address of waste have been deduced from the respective works. They include the usage of burn pits and the open “graveyard”. Such mechanism allows for the wastage or resources as well as the exposure of the environment with harmful gasses (A & E Television Networks, 34min). The reflection on the usage of burn pits as a measure of disposing of waste is regarded as an extensive measure upon which the disruption of the climatic harmony may be achieved. The action may be perceived to be comprised of further implications with respect to the efficiency of the considered dangers it accords to the environment (Barry, 34). “Graveyards,” on the other hand, promote the wearing of metals and other inputs that may benefit from processes such as recycling. International duty is associated with further challenges in respect to the possibility of moving the damaged automobiles and engines back to the Homeland. Vehicles and automobiles that exceed the spaces of the respective graveyards are considered for destruction since the military perceives the process as rather easier that shipping them to the homeland. In the eventual mission to hunt Osama bin Laden, “the military chose to destroy the military plane rather than ship it back to the United States” (Dillon, 47). Such models of destructions have been embraced in a number of military duties as compared to the prospective measure of shipping the defective equipments back to the homeland. The concept of cost and the liability in the realization of the mission have been tagged as primary concerns. In the promotion of better disposal mechanisms, the military should consider the possibility of recycling as being central to its services. Additional interests should be pegged on the introduction of such facilities in the description of activities that shape the entire outfit. Subsequent interests on the efficiency of recycling may be exercised in the training of the troops where the categorization of the waste needs to be considered among the curriculum. The care for the environment desires to be considered as a critical part in the promotion of the ethos of the respective outfits of the disciplinary forces (McGowan, 43). The military needs to partner with the local administration in the address of the loopholes associated with the management of waste. It remains under possible arrays to be able to establish a classified, but functional interaction with the civilian systems in the address of the waste challenges associated with the military. Additional revenue may be associated with the consideration of such partnership, as well as the eventual usage of their links in the promotion of safe disposal of wastes. Conclusion The measure adopted by the military towards the address of the respective elements of waste remains critical in the promotion of safe disposal activities. It remains apparent that the impression associated to waste material as an entity is considered inadequate in respect to the embraced methods of disposal. The usage of burn pits has negative impacts to the atmosphere and the climate. Military institutions such as the Defence Logistics Agency (DLA) have been unable to clear most of the junk material associated with the military “graveyard” for engines and automobiles. The prospective implication of such waste remains best considered along the impression of the harm that it stands to associate with the environment and the population. On that note, an extensive recycling program that involves the partnering with the civilian institutions has been suggested for the address of the waste concern. Work cited A & E Television Networks, LLC.; Films for the Humanities & Sciences (Firm); Films Media Group.Modern Marvels. New York, N.Y: Films Media Group, 2008. Barry, Bill. A Trash Hauler in Vietnam: Memoir of Four Tactical Airlift Tours, 1965-1968. Jefferson, N.C: McFarland, 2008. Print. Berry, K.H, T.Y Bailey, and K.M Anderson. "Attributes of Desert Tortoise Populations at the National Training Center, Central Mojave Desert, California, Usa." Journal of Arid Environments: Supplement. 67 (2006): 165-191. Print. Borglin, S, J Shore, H Worden, and R Jain. "An Overview of the Sustainability of Solid Waste Management at Military Installations." International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management. 13.1 (2010): 51-83. Print. Dexter, Helen. "New War, Good War and the War on Terror: Explaining, Excusing and Creating Western Neo-Interventionism." Development and Change. 38.6 (2007): 1055-1071. Print. Dillon, Lindsey. "Race, Waste, and Space: Brownfield Redevelopment and Environmental Justice at the Hunters Point Shipyard." Antipode. 46.5 (2014): 1205-1221. Print. Kamau, Caroline. "Strategising Impression Management in Corporations." (2010). Print. Louisville. All About. Louisville, CA: Gaiam, 2011. McGowan, Sam. Trash Haulers: The Story of the C-130 Hercules Troop Carrier/tactical Airlift Mission. , 2011. Print. Ruby, Tomislav, and Douglas Gibler. "Us Professional Military Education and Democratization Abroad." European Journal of International Relations. 16.3 (2010): 339-364. Print. Stern, Paul C. "Deliberative Methods for Understanding Environmental Systems." Bioscience. 55.11 (2005): 976-982. Print. U.S. Army. Personal Health in the Jungle. Washington, DC: War Office, 1944. United States. Afghanistan and Iraq: Dod Should Improve Adherence to Its Guidance on Open Pit Burning and Solid Waste Management: Report to Congressional Requesters. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, 2010. Internet resource. United States. Commanders Emergency Response Program: Projects at Baghdad Airport Provided Some Benefits, but Waste and Management Problems Occurred. Arlington, VA: Office of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, 2010. Internet resource. Read More