Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1640598-environmental-ethics-response-1
https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1640598-environmental-ethics-response-1.
Environmental Ethics al Affiliation) The article revolves around animal rights and equality. It brings out the relationships that exist between humans and animals. The relationships, whether based on companionship, nutrition or work, are character-building interactions. Both humans and animals coexist depending on the rights conferred to each party on the relationships. This means that the use of force to acquire dominance is the law that applies in the relationships between humans and animals.
However, the rights that animals enjoy are those that humans extend to them. Humans protect the animals in exchange for their willingness and ability to be trained in order to serve their needs. The contract between humans and animals is rudimentary. This is because humans are the grantors of animals’ rights, where they choose on what they feed, their medication, and even caring for their needs. In the case of livestock, humans determine what they feed and choose mates for the animals for purposes of robust breeds.
Animal rights are perceived to be acquired by virtue of birth. The rules of nature, however, do not give animals the sense of granting other animals their rights. The complex structures relating to equality, put in place by humans does not resemble any structures relating to animal rights. This proves that animals are not able to honor the necessary basic contract for the existence of their rights. Animals have quite an impact on the lives of human beings. Despite the sympathy and care that humans show to animals, the animals have rights that are enforceable by law.
Although the animals cannot comprehend the laws, they may be disastrous for the humans. The welfare of animals should be put into consideration to ensure that the quality of life is achieved by both humans and animals.
Read More