Difference between Exposed Shore and Sheltered Shore - Coursework Example

Aberdour report Introduction The below-mentioned report is an environmental report which is mainly based on some of the species of Animals, Seeds as well as Birds. The specimens were taken from the same or different places, but the final observation differs a lot. In the first two figures (provided that those two were from the same shore) the zonation pattern of the species varies a lot in the same species. So it is an interesting point to note as well as to research. Comparison between the Zonation Pattern of transects from Site A and B:- Transects from site A and Site B were from the same shore, although they have a lot of differences in their zonation pattern.

Looking at both the figures given, Ascophyllum nodosum has totally different represented structure in the second figure as compared to the first. The Max scale level in the first figure is in the C group, but in the second figure, it is only included in the F group. Limpets also have a different represented structure in the second figure as compared to the first. The Max scale level in the first figure is in the C group, but in the second figure, it is only included in the O group. The difference between Exposed Shore and Sheltered Shore Sheltered rocky shore is one where on earth the tide/waves cannot crash onto it; such as one where within a bay offering is some protection.

The exposed rocky shore is a short time ago the opposite, nil to stop waves crashing onto it. Exposure can be worse for deep-sea life as the pounding of the top can damage some organisms e.g. could construct them to lose their grip on the rocks. Further, organisms that can withstand the exposed shore are prone to less predatory effects and as a consequence can survive longer. A sheltered shore shows high biodiversity and near competition for space and resources. An exposed shore may still have a lofty density of organisms but the number of species present is lower.

Obvious associations between animals and seaweeds on the shores examined:- According to the shores examined, only two groups O and R are showing obvious association, as the group interval given in the diagram for both groups is the same. In all other groups (S, A, C, F), the interval varies by a small or huge difference. So it is clear from the observation that obvious association, in this case, is lesser than obvious disassociation. Also as I discussed in the last section about the zonation pattern of two different sites, those two were different from each other on a major basis.

So it reflects in the obvious association also (The obvious association, in this case, is lesser than the obvious disassociation). Conclusion As stated in the above report, the kite diagram helps a lot to understand the variation in the zonation pattern of the observation at the same or different shore. The data provided varies a lot from point to point, but with the help of the Kite diagram, the exact variation can be found and it was stated as the report.