StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Contract Law Exam seen case study - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Business Law By Your Name Class Name University Name Due Date Against Trusty Bank Guarantee is a promise by one party to be held responsible if a person defaults in paying his obligation. In case of such default, the guarantor becomes liable to the creditor to pay the debtor’s debt…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.3% of users find it useful
Contract Law Exam seen case study
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Contract Law Exam seen case study"

Download file to see previous pages In order to get that loan, he made Sophia sign on a deed which gave the Bank legal charge over her house. In this case, Tim has an undue influence over Sophia. He stands in a superior position to her and as, according to the given facts, Sophia is expecting her first child and wants to marry Tim, he can persuade her to do anything he wants. Also, Tim is described to be of an aggressive nature. It can be easily construed that Sophia gave the guarantee without knowing the consequences and she did that to secure her future with Tim as he had given assurances to her. He told her that he could afford to marry her only if he could raise some money and became a partner in the firm. That was the sole reason that Sophia agreed with Tim but she was not aware of the subtleties of this transaction. The only advice that she got in respect of this transaction was from Tim. Tim had undue influence over her and his advice would be disregarded. In Yerkey v Jones, a husband procured a guarantee from her wife against his creditor. It was held that such a guarantee was not valid. In a special set of circumstances, such a guarantee is invalidated, they are: a. A husband procures his wife’s guarantee to obtain a loan; b. The guarantee is not for the benefit of wife but of husband; c. There is a default in repayment by the husband; d. The creditor relies on the wife to get repaid; e. The creditor does not have sufficient reasons to believe that the wife’s consent was free. Sophia’s consent was not free. Tim is not her husband but his relation with her and the facts of the case are quite similar those of Yerkey v Jones. The transaction was for the sole benefit of Tim and had nothing in it for Sophia. Tim has left Sophia after having an affair. The Bank seeks to get possession of her house. There are no sufficient grounds for Trusty Bank to believe that Sophia understood the transaction and gave a free consent. It was obtained under undue influence and resulted in a voidable contract. As Sophia is looking to get out of the contract, it can be easily construed that the contract would become void. Sophia’s guarantee would be invalidated and Trusty Bank would not be able to get possession of her house. Tim is still liable to pay the loan and Trusty Bank has all the rights of a creditor against Tim. Against Deluxe Kitchens Ltd In a legally binding contract, the parties involved must perform their respective promises according to terms on which they agreed on. If any of the parties does not perform its promise correctly, the other party becomes entitled to sue for damages. The damages involve the amounts of losses that are caused directly due to the negligence or fault of the other party. In the given case, Sophia had contracted with Deluxe Kitchens Ltd to build and install some new fitted kitchen units to match existing units and new kitchen equipment for ?15,000. The work was not done as it was promised and Deluxe Kitchens Ltd were 4 weeks late in doing their job. Also, their work was not satisfactory. Sophia hired them to install units that would match her kitchen and they did not. Furthermore, there were some errors in their working. In order to fix those errors, almost ?3000 would be required. Sophia was without a cooker and she was offered by Deluxe Kitchens Ltd that they would install her old cooker but she refused. Due to delay in getting a new cooker, she was unable to cater for her sister’ ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Contract Law Exam seen case study Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1422153-contract-law-exam-seen-case-study
(Contract Law Exam Seen Case Study Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1422153-contract-law-exam-seen-case-study.
“Contract Law Exam Seen Case Study Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1422153-contract-law-exam-seen-case-study.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Contract Law Exam seen case study

Organization and Functions of Federal Law Enforcement Agencies

Threats may either appear in the form of terrorism or from other intelligence groups or from the espionage. It may arise within the country, against the existing government or social systems. Though most of the federal law enforcement groups are investigative groups, they are not only focused on investigations but stand for the people. One can see that the importance of the federal agencies is growing day by day because the threats from militants and others have considerably increased. Such kinds of federal law enforcement agencies include Federal Air Marshalls, Secret Service, FBI, Untouchables, C.I.A and Federal Corrections etc. The organization and functions of these agencies vary in different fields and can be cited in the fol...
7 Pages(1750 words)Case Study

Constitutional and Administrative Law

When examining the decision of previous court comments that are made obiter dicta will not be part of the precedent since often obiter dicta comments are speculative remarks on how the judge might have acted if the facts had been different.

Binding precedents come from earlier case law and, as suggested in the wording, must be followed even if the judge in the present case does not agree with the legal reasoning of the judge in the earlier case. In order for a precedent to be binding the facts of the present case to have to be sufficiently similar to the earlier case. Decisions given in a lower court to the one in which the present case is being heard will not be binding. For a decision to set a precedent it must have b...
8 Pages(2000 words)Assignment

The Idea of Liberty in Sam Slime Case

... Sam Slime This could certainly be the case of the rich get richer and the poor go to jail, especially in a country that is trying to serve many masters. The government of the United States is certainly a political and governmental entity, but at it heart it has almost always been a voice of corporate business and expansion of wealth for the few. It operates seemingly under the principle guise of what is good for business is good for the people. One could say that the state of the economy today is the fallout of this mindset. In the “Sam Slime” case study we see the idea of liberty as applied by several masters. The first, when Sam Slime mugs you outright is a matter for governmental law and order. Cleary there is a criminal (Sam...
8 Pages(2000 words)Coursework

Analysis of OReilly v Mackman Case

Judicial review is a concept which is constitutionally undecided as it on one side, it shores up the rule of law, democracy, and pre-eminence of parliament by facilitating the courts to check the boundaries of government authority and on another side, the courts are open to the decision on the plants based on the fact of separation of authorities that are intimating with the verdicts of democratically elected institutions. Judicial review is not apprehended with the virtues of government assessment but deals with whether the deciding authority has remained within the legal boundaries and whether broad principles of rationality and fairness adhere. The constitutional basis of judicial review is debated as one view holds that it is...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

The Law on Physical Punishment of Children Fails to give Sufficient Respect to Childrens Rights

Under the English criminal law, several past and current legislations were made in order to protect the children from corporal punishment or becoming a victim of physical abuse. Despite our effort to prevent parents from using physical force in disciplining their children, the British Government remains unconvinced that the law which protects the children from physical punishment is sufficient (Keating, 2008). Physical punishment such as ‘smacking’, ‘slapping’, ‘kicking’, or ‘spanking’ is referring to the act of causing a degree of pain or discomfort to the child. (Niland, 2009, p. 6) With regard to the legal issues behind child protection against physical abuse, this study aims to d...
6 Pages(1500 words)Coursework

Meaning and Characteristics of Contract

Even as it is almost certainly not viable to give one total and generally correct definition of a contract, the most normally admitted definition is: 'a promise or set of promises which the law will enforce' (Pollock Principles of Contract (13th Edn) 1). The key considerations for the enforcement of a contract against a promisor are economic meaning the economic obligation of gripping the adherence of bargains and moral meaning moral reason that the guarantee was freely given.

According to the present law of contract, claim for money is either for ‘payment of an agreed sum’, or for damages for breach of contract. In the 19th century, these two ideas made the common law to sanction full freedom and purity of...
6 Pages(1500 words)Coursework

International Law: Child Soldiers

Using children to fight wars is not only morally abhorrent but very bad very the physical and mental health of the children in question. That is in part why a series of international laws and treaties have come into effect to try to deal with this scourge. But the issue is more complicated than that. While child soldiers are victims of war crimes, they too can also perpetrate serious breaches of the law of armed conflict. Under normal circumstances, individuals who commit such acts, be they combatants or not,2 would be vulnerable to prosecution. However, because children in such situations are victims as well as perpetrators and because of the special protections afforded to children under international law, many have questioned w...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

The Law and the Media

New and complex issues have arisen which demanded fresh understanding and handling of cases involved them. This has resulted in the enhanced development of specialized laws e.g. cyber laws and interpretation of those laws. The same is true with Media Laws. Media has developed much in the last half-century. As it evolved as a profession and more people started to join it, there arose the levels of money involved in it. With this grew the contractual obligations on the parts of parties and concerned laws e.g. patent laws, privacy laws, and copyrights laws, etc. also started to play their parts. With these issues, the role of law in the media industry also reached a new height.
Mathew Fisher, the appellant, joined a band with Mr...
6 Pages(1500 words)Assignment

Internatioanl Construction Contract Consultants

..., but the contract Administrator CU Architects has vaguely talked about the fact that there could be circumstances for extensions of time for: After giving careful considerations about the points raised by you over the phone on various issues of the project, I wish to bring to your kind attention the following legal provisions under JCT contract provisions. 1. Inclement weather A contractor’s privilege to avail an extension of time due to concurrent delays can be found in (Henery Boot vs Malmaison 1. In this case, Mr. Justice Dyson in 1999 cited an illustration in a work site where standstill of work was caused due to labor shortages, which was not a relevant event especially during phases of extraordinarily inclement weather...
13 Pages(3250 words)Essay

Conflict Between Researh and Ethics on the Tuskegee Syphilis Study

The Declaration of Helsinki by the WHO clearly states that in clinical trials involving humans the wellbeing of the subject should be of prime importance than the interest of science or society. This has been stated because at times in order to achieve the objectives of a study the investigators might overlook the welfare of the trial subjects thus jeopardizing their health in the process. According to ethical rules while comparing two treatment options the control group of the study must receive the best-known treatment available while the study subjects are given a potential newer treatment. Only when there is no effective treatment available a placebo-controlled group can be used for the study. There have been several trials th...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Contract Law Exam seen case study for FREE!

Contact Us