Nobody downloaded yet

Compare and contrast traditional Marxist approaches to international relations with EITHER Neo-Gramscian OR Frankfurt School vie - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
ORTHODOX MARXISM AND NEO-GRAMSCIAN THEORY: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS by Presented to [Name of the Professor, Name of the Class] [Name of University] [Name of the City and State] May 3, 2011 Introduction This essay will deal with common and distinct features of orthodox Marxism and neo-Gramscian school as approaches to research of the IR…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.1% of users find it useful
Compare and contrast traditional Marxist approaches to international relations with EITHER Neo-Gramscian OR Frankfurt School vie
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Compare and contrast traditional Marxist approaches to international relations with EITHER Neo-Gramscian OR Frankfurt School vie"

Download file to see previous pages The essay will be structured as follows. In the first section, the basic assumption and specific views of orthodox Marxist theorists of the IR will be examined. It will be argued that orthodox Marxism proceeds from the notion of primacy of international economic relations over political processes in the world system of states, neglecting ideological dimensions of international system. The second section will be devoted to analysis of neo-Gramscian approach to the IR. The questions of neo-Gramscian view on interrelation between economic and social factors of the IR will be given due attention. Finally, in the third section which will represent a conclusion to the essay, the direct comparison between orthodox Marxism and neo-Gramscianism will be presented, with a view to proving the difference between these two schools of international political thought. 1. Orthodox Marxism as a Theory of International Relations Basic Assumptions of Orthodox Marxism The crux of orthodox Marxist approach to the study of the IR lies in its assumption of primacy of economic and technological development over purely political processes, and of predominance of the struggle between different social classes over conflicts between political states (Linklater, 2005, p. 110). Unlike idealist and realist perspectives that centre on assumption of basically unchanging process of competition between self-interested individuals/political entities, a Marxian political analysis rests on the idea of historical specificity of social processes and of organic nature of social relations (Rupert, 2007b, p. 150). The Marxist theory implies the interconnection between productive forces as material bases for social production, and relations of production, which refer to the social relations between individuals, usually organized into classes, over the issues of production and distribution of social product. A Marxist perspective on the social processes proceeds from the idea of dialectic of “relations in process” (Rupert, 2007b, p. 151), where the social subjects, or agents, are both dependent on social structures that set the framework for their actions and effect their maintenance and further development. In that way, social structures simultaneously determine the actions of social agents and are continuously altered by them (Rupert, 2007a, p. 36). In class society the nature of social agents is determined by their class nature, with capitalist social relations being preconditioned by the struggle between two socio-economic classes: the bourgeoisie (capitalist entrepreneurs) and the proletariat (propertyless wage workers). The View of International Relations in Orthodox Marxism Just as Marx and Engels viewed economic structure of specific societies as the factor defining the whole variety of its political, juridical and ideological forms (the former was regarded as “basis” of society, the latter as its “superstructure”), so they regarded the problems of the IR as the result of interactions of different economies controlled by national dominant classes, whose interests are represented politically by their state. According to Marx and Engels, as the existence of bourgeoisie as a class in capitalist society was predicated on ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Compare and contrast traditional Marxist approaches to international Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1419537-compare-and-contrast-traditional-marxist
(Compare and Contrast Traditional Marxist Approaches to International Essay)
“Compare and Contrast Traditional Marxist Approaches to International Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1419537-compare-and-contrast-traditional-marxist.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
Critically compare and contrast theories of management (classical, human relations, systems, contingency, Marxist labour process
The development of management theories was required to direct the development of industrial production in the Europe and the United States. Management Theories offer a stable foundation for helping the requirement of management theory using the management procedures for planning, organization, directing/leading, and controlling.
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Compare and Contrast the Classical, Human Relations, and Systems Approaches to Organization and Management
One of the key themes adapted by classical writers was based upon the formal structure of a purpose driven organization. They view organizations having formal structures having technical requirements based on extensive planning of work.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
International Relations. Approaches To Poverty, Environmental Issues
There are three key actors in International Relations. They include: 1. The State 2. International Organisations and 3. Non-State Actors. All of these entities are held together by international convention, international regimes and international law which ensures that they operate in an appropriate manner.
22 Pages(5500 words)Essay
Realist and Neo-Realist International Relations
Realism is the type of IR theory that interprets all aspect of international politics as reducible to a struggle for power, with the state seen as a unitary entity in control (more or less) of its destiny, the main actor but conditioned in its behaviour by the "international anarchy", the absence of government in interstate sphere that is regarded as the hallmark of international politics.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Frankfurt School
The Frankfurt School is a school that followed the new doctrines of Marx in combination with the social and philosophical research. It was at this school that a group of people came out with new ideas that were co-related with Social Research.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Beo-Gramscian Approaches and Marxist Thinking on International Relations
"Radicals are concerned most with explaining the relationship between production, social relations and power" (Mingst, 2005, p.72). The neo-Gramscian perspective is a current of Marxist theories in international relations but retains a distinct identity among them since it significantly differs from other Marxist perspectives on questions of the sources of power, the role ideology and culture, the significance of consensus and the nature of hegemony.
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Compare and contrast functionalist and marxist perspectives including feminist perspectives
While functionalism provides a consensus perspective, Marxism and feminism provide a conflict perspective. Each of the perspectives focuses on the family as central to society, and each differently interprets the relationship between social change and the family (Bond,
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
What Is The Relationship Between International Organization And Industrial Change From A Neo-Gramscian Perspective
In the early 1980s, with the nearly uncontrollable accretion and swelling of Latin America's "post-dependency" era, which was called, from the following two years onwards, the "Debt Crisis", transmogrifying then, semantically for the better, into the "debt situation" (which continues to flay it alive as only American "situations" can)-with the maximum haemorrhaging in Argentina and the recent Leftist truculence of Venezuela's Hugo Chavez-Robert W Cox formulated a theory that encompassed, among other things, hegemony, world order and historical change (Cox 1981; 1983).
15 Pages(3750 words)Essay
Compare and contrast the positions of one or more neo-Marxist or post-Marxist theorists of ideology with those of the classical Marxist tradition
With many leading economists of our time, including Thomas Friedman, Joseph Heath (and to a lesser extent Paul Krugman and Joseph
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
United States and the neo-Gramscian perspectives
configuration between dominant ideas, institutions and material capacities that are widely accepted as.1 The manner by which states, groups and players navigate the intricacies of the global order is seen to lead to global hegemonies as a way to ensure survival and perpetuate
13 Pages(3250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Compare and contrast traditional Marxist approaches to international relations with EITHER Neo-Gramscian OR Frankfurt School vie for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us