Free

Free trade vs Mercantilism - Term Paper Example

Comments (1) Cite this document
Summary
6 March 2011. Mercantilism Theory: Mercantilism is one of the numerous theories of economy that emphasize upon the dependence of a state’s prosperity on the flow of capital. In 1763, the term “Mercantilism” was coined by marquis de Mirabeau and Victor de Riqueti, and Adam Smith played a primary role in spreading it by discussing the contributions of various mercantilists in the book he wrote in 1776, titled The Wealth of Nations (Niehaus cited in “New World Encyclopedia”)…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.4% of users find it useful
Free trade vs Mercantilism
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Free trade vs Mercantilism"

6 March Mercantilism Theory: Mercantilism is one of the numerous theories of economy that emphasize upon the dependence of a state’s prosperity on the flow of capital. In 1763, the term “Mercantilism” was coined by marquis de Mirabeau and Victor de Riqueti, and Adam Smith played a primary role in spreading it by discussing the contributions of various mercantilists in the book he wrote in 1776, titled The Wealth of Nations (Niehaus cited in “New World Encyclopedia”). West European policies of economy between 16th and 18th centuries were largely dominated by the Mercantilism theory. Thus, it can be said that Mercantilism was ingrained in the European economic policies from the Renaissance period to the early years of industrialization. Mercantilism theory asserts that the volume of global trade that occurs internationally is “unchangeable”. Therefore, whenever one party takes benefit of any sort, there is another party that has to suffer from an equivalent loss. Mercantilism encourages the representation of economic assets as bullion including gold and silver that are of huge trade value. The Mercantilism approach holds the belief that every nation’s wealth is primarily dependent upon its richness in such precious metals as gold, platinum and silver. According to the Mercantilism theory, there is no difference between monetary assets and wealth. Mercantilism believes in the fact that the government in rule should play the role of a protectionist in economy. This can be achieved by declining imports with the use of tariffs and improving exports by making use of subsidies. The primary theme of policies of economy in the years of Mercantilism was to reinforce the strength of both a state’s internal and external position (Hansen 61). Mercantilism believes in achieving this by promoting a nation’s exports and reducing its imports (Reinert et al. 758). Such a system is hard to maintain forever due to the fact that if all countries only export and no country is willing to import, then it would result into the stagnation of global economy. The trade value increases as more and more trade is carried out between states. Mercantilism has ignited enough tensions in Europe to cause many wars. Also, it has played an important role in the expansion of Europe and has spread imperialism not only in Europe, but also all over the world. With the passage of time, a lot of economists started to criticize the theory of Mercantilism and emphasized upon the requirement of free trade. Although Mercantilism may cause a decline in the global output, a country may ultimately derive a bigger share than others because of the enlightened self-interest (Friedman 67). The long exerted pressure of the critics ultimately led to enforcement of the laissez faire economics. One example of country where Mercantilist system of economy prevails is Japan. Free Trade Theory: Free trade theory is a system that facilitates trading by enabling the traders to carry out their job across boundaries without having to bear interference of the respective governments. This trade policy allows the trading permits to mutually benefit one another through exchange of products and services. Therefore, under the implementation of a free trade policy, products are sold at prices that reflect the actual supply and demand scenario. Prices determine the allocation of resources. The fundamental difference between the free trade policy and the conventional policies of trade is that the resource allocation in the former occurs with respect to actual prices unlike the latter, in which the artificial prices do not reveal the correct picture of supply and demand. The protectionist policies of trade are controlled by the governments that restrict supply and adjust prices so as to make the prices artificial. When governments intervene in the trade, they may either increase or decrease the price of products for both suppliers and the consumers. Interventions from government happen in the form of taxes, subsidies, barriers of tariff or non-tariff sort like quotas and legislations. Mercantilism policy had prevailed throughout Europe for many centuries before the introduction of doctrine of Free Trade. Many economists raised their consents in favor of the free trade policy because they believed that flow of trade was the main reason of civilization of many nations. Economists who have analyzed the impacts of free trade have conventionally based their opinions on the “concepts of trade creation and trade diversion” (Miller 9). “Free trade in corn enabled the creation of a virtuous circle or reproduction, where high profits produced high investments, yielding increasing returns, reduced unit production costs, and led to potential increases in rents and profits, even with lower retail prices” (Vaggi and Groenewegen 68). Thus, the free trade policy has conventionally met with success in terms of maximized profits and increased trade wherever it has been implemented. One example of a country with free trade system is USA. Works cited: Friedman, Kenneth S. Myths of the free market. US: Algora Publishing, 2003. Print. Hansen, E. Damsgaard. European economic history: from mercantilism to Maastricht and beyond. Denmark: Copenhagen Business School Press, 2001. Print. Miller, Arnold S. Free trade: current issues and prospects. NY: Novinka Books, 2004. Print. “New World Encyclopedia: Mercantilism.” 3 Apr. 2009. Web. 8 Mar. 2011. . Reinert, Kenneth A., Rajan, Ramkishen S., Glass, Amy J., and Davis, Lewis S. The Princeton Encyclopedia of the World Economy: I-W. UK: Princeton University Press, 2009. Print. Vaggi, Gianni, and Groenewegen, Peter D. A concise history of economic thought: from mercantilism to monetarism. NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Free trade vs Mercantilism Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1410539-free-trade-vs-mercantilism
(Free Trade Vs Mercantilism Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1410539-free-trade-vs-mercantilism.
“Free Trade Vs Mercantilism Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1410539-free-trade-vs-mercantilism.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (1)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
zm
zmarvin added comment 1 year ago
Student rated this paper as
At first, I thought 3 of pages is too much for such a issue. But now I see it could not be done better. As the author starts you see the depth of the subject. I’ve read all at once. Perfect essay

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Free trade vs Mercantilism

Free Trade during Colonialism vs. Free Trade during Globalization

...? Free trade during colonialism vs. free trade during globalization Introduction Many people have the illusion that free trade is an entirely modern economic concept which is the brain child of globalization. In reality, free trade existed in numerous forms even during colonialism. Free trade during colonialism and free trade during globalization have lot of similarities and differences in principles and practices. It should be noted that during colonialism, colonial powers encouraged free...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Free Trade

...Introduction Free trade also can be defined as business transactions between countries without any restrictions that are imposed by the government. A more popular term given to this phenomenon is that of "liberalization or open trade". Stiglitz (pp 56-67) defines it as, close integration between countries and people that has resulted in vast reduction on trade barriers to allow free flow of goods and services across the countries. There are various restrictions that exist in trade. They include non tariff trade barriers, tariff, legislation and taxes. Free trade in terms of economics...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Trade/Free-Trade Agreements

...Engelbrecht Hellen Engelbrecht Academia-Research Paper Academia Order 172265 27 May 2007 Trade/Free Trade Agreements Various countries are involved in international trade amongst one another. There are organizations developed specifically for the negotiations of trade between foreign lands such as the WTO - World Trade Organization. The bartering of goods across international borders or regions between countries constitutes 'International Trade'. Quite a substantial portion of especially third world countries' gross domestic product is due to the quantity their international trade affiliations....
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Free Trade

...1. Argue using examples from sources why Free Trade has been good for Canada. Free trade is not just about external economies confined to outward investments and the costs attached to it. Here, there is an international exchange happening. In terms of outward investment, for instance, it becomes a benefit when it helps to spread the strength of Canadian firms over larger markets. In this regard, even though in a sense outward investment involves some transfer of jobs from Canada to a foreign country, it retains market access, which for its part contributes to Canada’s welfare once profit is remitted back to Canada. As a consequence it stimulates the country’s wealth and...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Free Trade

...Free Trade Affiliation: Economists have been divided in their arguments for and against free trade. Free trade has allowed the breaking of trade tariffs and barriers across the globe as more and more economies engage in international trade. Alan Blinder presented his side of the story in a Wall Street Journal article in regard to free trade arguments (Wessel & Davis, 2007). Although he held a different opinion in prior years to the posting of this article, the article reveals the critical concern of free trade in a globalized world. Specifically, communication has allowed outsourcing of services externally; outside one country. The problem with this type of outsourcing is that it can critically harm the domestic labor market. Ease... of...
1 Pages(250 words)Article

Comparative Economic Systems

...FREE TRADE and FREE TRADE Over the years, global trade has become more and more diversified. Many different countries across the globe have moved swiftly to exploit the prospects of free trade. The rise of free trade is significant to the economic welfare of any given state. Countries that embrace free trade have access to open markets around the world. With low import-export restrictions, international trade has increasingly become a revolutionary practice. Today, promoting free trade is a global affair....
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Free Trade

...Free trade Free trade is both a governance and business management function in which stakeholders develop effective mechanisms that permit unrestricted import and export of goods from their countries to the neighboring countries without restrictions. The growth of international trade and rapid development of economies relies on the types of business relationship a country develop with her neighbors. Free trade is therefore a contentious issue between Mexico and her neighbors including the United States and Canada. The three countries have conflicting interests in the development of international trade in...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Free trade

...Free Trade al Affiliation: Trade Free trade is viewed by many as a way of inhibiting competition. I fully support free trade. Theyhave not looked at the comparative advantages of free trade in the country. I also support NAFTA. Since the agreement by the United States, Mexico and Canada, there has been tremendous growth in industries as well as international trade that many feared will eventually die. The above mentioned states have had significant economic growth. For instance, the Canadian manufacturing employment has grown steadily; the Mexican maquiladoras have also...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Free Trade

...Free Trade Free Trade Free trade helps in attaining cost advantage because it allows a nation to obtain goods, services and resources at much lower cost as compared to the cost of producing these elements locally (Jones, 2001). It allows consumers to access goods and services at much cheaper prices as compared to the prices at which the same goods and services can be bought from domestic suppliers. It provides organizations with a larger market and a huge customer base to sell their offerings. The disadvantage of free trade for developing nations is that they cannot compete with the organizations of...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Term Paper on topic Free trade vs Mercantilism for FREE!

Contact Us