Political authority can be justified in those zones where focus is on giving the rights to the people. This is true in the case of a democratic entity where people are given the right to choose a leader for their own selves. …
Download file to see previous pages...
The leaders are accountable for their actions and behaviors, and usually do the right thing because otherwise they would have to present their case in front of the publics. Political authority seems justified when there are norms and procedures that take care of the political manifestations and when people are given what they deserve the most – democracy. In essence, it is always a good practice to make use of the political authority to understand the nuances of the Western liberal democracy. This has been demonstrated through the works of Plato, Locke and Mill. The political authority is therefore a very common concept within the political discourse as it encompasses of people from different strata of life. The political authority is a very dire requirement within the political obligations which have been questioned by the works of Plato and Aristotle, and which remain significant even in the time and age of today. It is also a fact that within democratic set ups in a number of countries around the world, there is a good amount of discussion regarding political authority in particular as its role cannot be denied its due right. Within United States, political authority has been given much emphasis because it gives freedom to the people from the domains of the government. Indeed morality is a social contract for our mutual benefit. The ethical domains need to be in line with the way people conduct their lives. This means that people should adhere to the moral righteousness and thus give in their very best with regards to the manifestation of their actions and behaviors. Morality asks of people to be fair and forthright about their dealings and be clean related with their thinking mechanisms. They must put the good of the whole society in retrospect more than their own good (Thiroux 2003). What this eventually does is to demonstrate a sense of goodwill within the society and thus the people generally look up to one another in times of help and distress. Morality is indeed a state of mind, which gets represented in a whole lot of ways. In essence, human beings are generally good natured souls, who care about one another in a very open and direct way. Yet there are some individuals who think of their own gains more than anything else. This mars the ultimate basis of stability and growth within the society and essentially hurts the cause of the society in the larger scheme of things. Thus the human beings are a combination of both good and the bad within any society. One must understand that living morally is indeed something that comes out as a very natural and clean process. It is not at all hard and strenuous by any stretch of imagination. The need is to have a proper mechanism under which morality could be represented in a variety of ways, by the people, for the people and to the people (Morgan 1983). One should take up the Kantian theory of ethics which speaks exclusively of the moral domains within any society of the world. Since Kantian theory focuses on the manifestation of ethical norms and procedures more than mere feelings and emotions of mortals, one would absolutely buy this theory on any given day. In essence personal belief systems revolve around the rationale presented by Immanuel Kant in his theory. One should believe that he has hit the nail on the head whilst referring to the details related with the moral representation of people’s dealings in day to day lives. Morality is important to the day to day situations since people view things very differently on a normal basis. If individuals start acting in a very ethical fashion, it would not be much distant when one views the entire society as a combination of good men and women within its folds. Indeed a moral system needs to be structured and very clear in its content so that people
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Political Authority and Morality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1410279-1-a-explain-and-illustrate-one-account-of-how-political-authority-can-be-justified-250-words-b-is-morality-a-social
(Political Authority and Morality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Political Authority and Morality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1410279-1-a-explain-and-illustrate-one-account-of-how-political-authority-can-be-justified-250-words-b-is-morality-a-social.
Dworkin’s article Liberal Community debates the issue of whether or not the criminal law should serve as an instrument for enforcing “conventional ethics”. In this regard, Dworkin’s theory of ethics distinguishes between that which is right and that which is moral. Morality is difficult to codify because there is no universal moral code.
Interrogating the Motivational Factors of Arson. It has been observed that “arson is an extremely serious offence which has become an increasing problem in Britain and Amercia in recent decades’ (Clarke, 1996, p.107). Arson is a widespread form of disruption in the advanced Western countries.
As globalization takes its course, acknowledgment of cultural diversification is given high regard. Many societies become inclined to accept as true that culture and societal identity are inseparable, and that the former is what gives morality a more profound connotation.
Notably, people have different perceptions concerning various situations. It is the interpretation of things that determines how a person responds and thus the basis of morality in the society. Friedrich Nietzsche poses the idea that our present morality evolved from ancient time.
Majority of contemporary political theorists consider that the state has authority in the descriptive sense. This means that the state maintains public order via creating rules and issuing commands that subjects generally obey due to the dominant belief that the state has authority to do so (Hart 1961).
During the painful and slow evolution of man's behaviour in the society, somehow, somewhere the need for an ethical code was felt and morality took root. The question still remains as to how we lost the pre-ethical condition and is it possible to go back to it.
The author states that philosophy of ethics states ethics and morality as more essential and sublime factors in nature for human welfare and happiness in comparison with the religious sets of belief; for religious teachings are limited to one single community, while morality maintains universality in its theme.
This paper incorporates and integrates the explorations on plebeian sexual morality and its cultural implications on the men and women of the era as described in the works of historian Anna Clark.
The essence of the
The author of this paper explains that Hobbes and Locke have contributed significantly to the field of political science. Both theorists tend to have similar views with regard to where power emanates in the society. They both support the constitution or popular contract as an avenue where the people give the power to rule.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Political Authority and Morality for FREE!