A Tale of Two Killings - Report Example

A tale of two killings: what happens when Idaho police shot a dog and a pregnant woman in one day “A tale of two killings: what happen when Idaho police shot a dog and a pregnant woman in one day” featured in guardian and authored by Paul Lewis, narrates how Idaho county police executed a pregnant woman alongside a dog. This matter, as the story explains, occurred in two different locations fifty miles apart. The writer introduces the report by first narrating the events that led to the shooting of the pregnant woman. He explains that, the woman, named as Jeanetta Riley aged 35 years was a drug junkie and an alcoholic. On the fateful day, she and her 44 year old husband had been having quarrels as they indulgedin their day to day drug abuse and drinking. That day however, the quarrels were heightened on this particular day. After dropping their 13 year old daughter at her step father’s house, the couple returned to their camp site while she purchased a bottle of vodka along the way. She indulged herself with the bottle of vodka by drinking half of it hence becoming rowdy and extremely disorderly. She started continually threatening to kill herself while brandishing a three and a half inch fillet knife. Her husband, fearing for his life, rushed to an emergency room asking for help while explaining the misfortune that was befalling him. The nurse at the report desk quickly pushed the panic button prompting the local police. Two officers arrived almost immediately to contain the drunken lady who had become chaotic and a threat to people around her. The police officers were armed with guns in preparation to dealing with the threat at hand. After numerous calls failed for Jeanetta to drop her weapon, the police officers finally shot at her. The shots fired hit Jeanetta killing her instantly on the spot. The writer continues further to compare this incident to another shooting that led to the killing of a harmless pet dog. The incident occurring not so far from Jeanetta’s shooting location sparked a nation-wide uproar on police inhumane killing of dogs in a campaign by the name “justice for Arfee”. Arfee was the dog’s name. As the writer reports, the incident occurred outside a coffee shop where the owner had halted when coming from the lake. The dog’s owner parked outside the coffee house and got into the shop to have some coffee. He was informed by a girl who came running up into the shop claiming they (the police) had shot the dog and taken it away. The man narrates that he rushed out only to find his van covered in blood. Having reared the dog since he was a puppy, the man known as Jones, was upset and immediately alerted the media via social sites of what had befallen his dog. The police on the other hand, narrated that they acted upon calls that a van was suspiciously following children around and this made them want to know what the matter was really. In the process, the officer claims that he shot the dog on terms of self-defence when he thought the dog was attacking him. Police shooting of a service dog sparks protests In the article “police shooting of a service dog sparks protests”, written by FOX 5 digital team, the authors narrate how a police officer shot and killed a service dog in close range. The authors narrate the officers had responded to distress calls that reported a possible incident of domestic violence. The officers arrived to the home of a 24 year old young man known as Anderson to check on the alleged disturbances. On arrival and in an attempt to question Anderson regarding the disturbance, his dog, Burberry was heard making growling noises. The dog, as the police narrated, was attempting to get out of the house and attack the officers. In the attempt to keep the dog at bay, the first officer narrates that, he stretched his hand out to block the dog when it allegedly attacked the second officer. It is then that the second officer shot the dog. Anderson as the writers narrate claimed that his dog was a calm animal and that it was also a registered service dog. He narrates that the dog helped him cope with anxiety and depression and that the shooting would make his condition very critical or even worsen it. This killing also sparked off varied reactions and attitudes to people that heard of the occurrence. In fact, the social media was saturated with backlash towards the police for their inhuman action. Those angered claimed that the police had failed in killing the dog and that they stood liable for the mishap caused. Man whose Rottweiler was shot by police sues city of Hawthorne officers In the article “Man whose Rottweiler was shot by police sues city of Hawthorne officers”, authored by Christina cocca of NBC LosAngeles, describes the events that led to the shooting of a civilian dog. The writer narrates how the dog owner placed a law suit after the incident and she further narrates the events that led to the shooting of the dog. These events were also captured on a video that went viral in news and social sites. The officers, according to the article, in their defence reported that the owner was causing disturbance in an ongoing police standoff. They claim that the owner played loud music and was in close proximity of the officer’s standoff, and hence caused untold nuisance. In addition, the police explained that the dog owner was also recording the officer’s activities in his mobile phone which was not in order. The article continues to report that, the officers cuffed the dog owner and this is when the dog came towards them and on trying to restrain the dog, their attempts failed hence leading to the shooting. One officer, according to the article, shot the dog four times and watched as it growled on the ground until it died. Alberta serious incidence response team (ASIRT) not investigating death of a pit bull shot by Edmonton police. In the article “Alberta serious incidence response team (ASIRT) not investigating death of a pit bull shot by Edmonton police” authored by Kevin Maimann describes the lag in the investigation of a dog shooting event. The article expounds that the dog’s shooting was by the police from Edmonton police department officers as they were on duty investigating a distress call. The distress call was a breaking and entering scenario. As police were responding to this, the dog as the article narrates, got in the way of police duty and thus hindered them from fulfilling their task. One of the officers shot the dog and it was rushed to a vet nary hospital but unfortunately died. The officers reported in the article that the dog got entangled with a police dog and would not let go. It is then that that the officers shot the rogue dog in order to save the police dog. The police dog according to the report only sustained minor injuries. The writer also narrates that the dog’s shooting led to the starting of an online fundraiser aimed to pay vet nary bills for the killed dog and help the owner get another puppy. People who had come into contact with the dog also reported that the dog was friendly therefore showing concern to the killing of the dog. Work cited Cocca, Christina. “Man Whose Rottweiler Was Shot By Police Sues City of Hawthorne, Officers.”. NBC Southern California. 14Th February 2014. Web. 26 Apr. 2015. Lewis, Paul. A Tale Of Two Killings: What Happened When Idaho Police Shot A Dog And A Pregnant Woman In One Day. The Guardian. 3rd April 2015. Web. 26 Apr. 2015. < http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/apr/03/idaho-police-shootings-jeanetta-riley-justice-for-arfee> Maimann, Kevin, and Kevin Maimann. Alberta Serious Incident Response Team (ASIRT) Not Investigating Death of Pit bull Shot by Edmonton Police. Edmonton Sun. 10Th April 2015. Web. 26 Apr. 2015. Police Shooting Of Service Dog Sparks Protests. FOX 5 Digital Team. 20Th March 2015. Web. 26 Apr. 2015. Read More