Comparison between Dracula and Christine - Essay Example

Comparison between Dracula and Christine Introduction There are millions of books written from different genres and targeting different audiences. Some of the books written live beyond their time to entertain generations over years. Two of the best known novels are Dracula by Bram Stoker published in 1897 and Christine by Stephen King published in 1983. The two novels are both horror and their impact to the literature enthusiasts as well as other people have been immeasurable. Films have been made on their basis and this made the novels even more captivating. This essay will try to analyze the writing style of Dracula in comparison to Christine. The essay describes which book was more effective in regard to the style used by the author. Dracula is timeless novel and seems more effective in the writing style than Christine. Dracula is written as a collection of diary sections, letters, telegrams, and notices. According to (Stoker 7) Dracula writes a letter to Jonathan Harker welcoming him to Carpathians. The thought, Stoker lets us know in the note toward the start of the novel, is to present the events of the story as basic actuality, despite the fact that some section of the events are difficult to accept. The accumulation of archives is similar to a pile of confirmation being introduced at court. The truth is out – as the reader, you get the opportunity to go about as judge and jury. The written work style is direct and extremely quick – the characters write in their diaries basically as events are occurring, so the reader encounters the events as the characters do. The novel, Dracula, is made out of a progression of first-person diaries, letters, and statements, which implies there are various narrators, and different perspectives are there represented. Stokers prefatory statement clarifies this, and demands that the main editing that has been done is to cross out anything that isnt important to the story. All the diaries and letters, generally, are precisely as they were initially composed. Dracula is an action-packed narration about vampires and how to execute them. Since it is told from different perspectives through a collection of journal sections, letters, and notes, theres not a considerable measure of boredom. The story moves along at a really decent clasp, so there is never time to be exhausted. The dialect is sometimes troublesome only in light of the fact that it was composed more than a century ago, and there are some dark chronicled and social references that may exhausting for modern readers. In Christine, the author uses almost similar style as there are a few twists and turns along the way. Something which King does as such well is composing from the points of view of different characters, and this is done splendidly in Christine. Parts exchanging fundamentally between Arnie, Dennis and Leigh give us a decent understanding into the different sentiments of the characters, something which gives a personal read. The books have elegantly been composed, thus simple to rationally envision, it is a genuine treat. However, Dracula was more effective since the use of multiple characters in Christine was a bit vague and at some point it would be easy to confuse the reader. While the greater part of the book is in first-person, with Dennis as readers trusty dependable storyteller, theres an area where he winds up in hospital after a football accident and the account switches, mysteriously, to third-individual who is unknown. Its jostling and bumbling – or it would be on the off chance that it wasnt sufficiently close to the lukewarm style of story introduced in Dennis voice whatever remains of the path through. When Dennis is back, not a lot has changed. It does not even feel as though he has not been with readers, not by any stretch of the imagination. Come the end of the novel, it is still not clear who the third-individual narrator is, or how Dennis comprehends what it reported. Dracula is based on myths and cultural practices that involve spirits of the dead souls and the resurrection of the mortals to become immortals. The author derives the name Dracula from "Dracula" which is Romanian for devil (or "mythical beast," initially), so it is a fitting name for the vampire – however it was likewise the name of an order of knights in medieval Romania. Vlad the Impalers dad was an individual from the Order of the Dracula, so his child took the name "Dracula" signifying "child of the Dracula. The author decides to name the book in reference to the villain which is rare thing among other authors. The intention was to make Dracula the centre of the story and in many ways this was successful. The novel is called Dracula, and beyond any doubt, counts Dracula, as the antagonist, is the binding together component of the novel. The good characters have generally little in common, other than their longing to murder Dracula. Considering that the novel is named after him, however, Dracula himself makes a few appearances after Jonathan leaves Castle Dracula toward the end of Chapter 4. It appears that Stoker understood that the fundamental purpose of the novel ought to be the connections that grow between the good characters, or the "Crew of Light". Along these lines, toward the end, Draculas demise is of moderately little significance – it is about Quincey and the rest of the characters. Stephen King equally uses the villain of the story to title his book. Christine is not just a car. She is evil and is alive in Libertyville. A devil that lives in a custom-painted white and red 1958 Plymouth Fury and now is manifested in the teenage boy, Arnold Cunningham, who decides to purchase it from one strange Roland LeBay. The book incorporates the use of technology and myth to bring out the mysterious powers of Christine. The author gives Christine her own brain, so that she regularly takes it upon herself to take a midnight drive or two. The sentiments Arnie has for Christine is all that much common. Also, when somebody is disturbing Arnie or acts as a burden, Christine will make a move. There are some extremely extraordinary sections in the book in which a rampaging Christine tracks down, pursues and murders some of Arnies adversaries, something that readers may discover to be all the while exasperating. Christine and Arnie have fortified, and she will do anything to dispose of any other person who Arnie has demonstrated affection to, so she can have him all to herself. This puts Dennis and Leigh a risk as well, and albeit at the end of the day this all sounds rather faltering. One thing that disturbs many readers is inconsistency in characterization of the book Christine. At the point when Arnie has a massive argument with his mother, Regina, the events are explained through the eyes of Dennis. Throughout the next three pages, Dennis depicts Regina as aristocratic, then he alludes to her as semi-aristocratic, then he says that she is not aristocratic at everything. Dennis admits to like Arnies parents, then he taunts them perseveringly and clarifies that he does not trust Regina on the grounds that she shouted at him one time and he feels that she looks down on him, and then he all of a sudden proclaims that he is infatuated with her. Dennis more than once discusses how awesome his own mom is, yet he has no less than three discussions with his father that spin exclusively around ridiculing her yearnings to be an author. There is no doubt that the two authors did a great job in their books and were able to capture their target audience on different levels. As both novels are horror, there is much difference in the approach used by the authors. Stephen King works in a modern world and he is able to incorporate advance technology to his work. Nonetheless, Christine has been used to bring out conflict that exists between relationships on different levels ranging from family, friendship and material possession. Stoker on the other hand is working with the Victorian set up. The dressing and even the dialect is different but this is some of the things that make the book unique. Whereas some people argue that Dracula is the antagonist in the book, this point is open to argument because Stoker presents more than one villain. The two authors have both use multiple narrators in their work with different characters taking the lead role in different times. This has helped the authors give the readers a wider perspective of the activities taking place in the book. In doing this, the authors have been able to illustrate the different perspective of characters and their traits equally. But one thing that is a bit clear is that in Dracula, there is allot of consistency with the characters and their traits. They seem to be consistent on their stand and takes on different activities taking place in the book. With Christine, some of the characters and actually some of the activities are a bit inconsistent. According to Spignesi (124) Christine is one of the books that gave Stephen King so many critics as some people found allot of inconsistency in the book. Works cited Top of Form Stoker, Bram. Dracula. Charlottesville, Va: University of Virginia Library, 1996. Print. Top of Form Spignesi, Stephen J. The Essential Stephen King: A Ranking of the Greatest Novels, Short Stories, Movies and Other Creations of the Worlds Most Popular Writer. Franklin Lakes, N.J: New Page, 2003. Print. Bottom of Form Bottom of Form Read More