This paper will seek to summarize points required in academic writing. First, listening to others in academic writing is shown as a very crucial process. The argument is that it is good not to focus on ones ideas before responding to other people ideas. The best thing one is required to do is to summarize other people’s views and then respond with well-structured ideas in kind (Graff and Birkenstein 23). The perception is that academic writing is argumentative, and therefore one has to use other people assertions to be able to enter into a conversation. Therefore, the voice of others should be seen when one engages in academic writing (Graff and Birkenstein 23). Secondly, making statements that are logical, well-supported, and consistent is viewed as a key thing to a writer. For example, in writing an argument, one has to know how to enter a conversation by with other views. Moreover, the conversation should be seen as a response to others, and this will make it more credible. One is also required to acknowledge others in the conversation. Moreover, one needs to understand the importance of critics. Critics are shown as playing a role in deriving a conversation (Graff and Birkenstein 26). Moreover, there is argument that making a sentence that does not require a response is not good in academic writing. The author’s notes that are agreeing and disagreeing at the same time are the recommended route (Graff and Birkenstein 28). The effect is that one can make a more complicated argument.