Respond to prompt - Book Report/Review Example

Manufactured Scientific Controversies Manufactured Scientific Controversies Manufactured scientific controversies are prolonged idealistic concepts that scientists use as excuses to evade, for a while, the implementation of programs that are deemed unfit or unsuitable in the public discourse. There have been several instances in which pretexts are given to the skeptical public who question particular issues. The ‘manufactured’ scientific controversy is a response through which the public or any other skeptical person with interest in a particular issue is silenced.

It explains that those issues that people are skeptical about are under scientific research and answers can only be found once research is completed. Unfortunately, this research is never completed and the issues remain unsolved for a long period before an accurate and comprehensive explanation is offered. An example is the mystery about HIV/AIDS. Several people have attempted and sought to understand the disease and at least an explanation as to its origins. The response has been that such questions are still under scientific investigation more than thirty years down the line.

Global warming and GMOs are among other controversies.For scientists to persuade and convince the audience, they use different rhetoric. They portray themselves as part of those seeking answers. This involves giving the impression that they also sympathize with the public. Consequently, explicit appeals are another way the scientists use to convince the audience. Some may use self-reference in which they appeal to the audience through their own stories. The many well-choreographed explanations are presented in such a way that people can believe (Fahnestock, 1989, p. 28).ReferenceFahnestock, J. (1989). Arguing in Different Forums: The Bering Crossover Controversy.

Science, Technology & Human Values, 14(1), 26-42. doi:10.1177/016224398901400103