Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

Literature Review On Groups & Teams - Book Report/Review Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The current study draws a distinctive line between groups and teams, insisting that groups are the initial stage of people’s organization having “no clear performance objectives” (Katzenbach, 1993, p.15). Thus, the author insists that groups are less productive than teams…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.4% of users find it useful
Literature Review On Groups & Teams
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Literature Review On Groups & Teams"

Download file to see previous pages Typical characteristics of the team emerging from disciplined actions are defined as follows: performance goals agreed by the team members; a common purpose shaped by them; mutual accountability for work results; developed complementary skills within the team; a common approach approved and agreed upon by the members. Thus, it becomes obvious that the author distinguishes the team from the group and presents the former as a balanced mechanism. Moreover, the author states that a group working together is not necessarily a team (the single labelling is not enough). Team is referred to as an elementary unit of performance existing in most organizations. Generally, the book emphasizes interconnection between performance-driven challenges and the teams’ existence and efficiency.
team” (Oakley et al., 2004, p.13). The authors emphasize the distinction between groups and teams, viewing a group as an original structure consisting of mainly disconnected individuals. The authors assert that group members can work together, but they are more likely to work independently, without discussing tasks, goals etc. with others.
The authors focus on teams as the most favorable student unit for working in class and the most effective way of student’s organization in conditions of college teaching with restricted amounts of class time. Furthermore, teams may and even are to contain both successful and weak members in order to bring the best results. For the same purpose, minimal number of team members is expected to be three, because dyads may show poorer varieties of ideas and skills for problems solution (Oakley et al., 2004, p.12). Team members are stated to work together, to assume different roles and responsibilities, to solve conflicts amicably and to help each other.
In the paper providing a thorough review of literature on the topic of work groups and teams, the authors prefer to make no distinction ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Literature Review On Groups & Teams Book Report/”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Literature Review On Groups & Teams Book Report/)
“Literature Review On Groups & Teams Book Report/”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Literature Review On Groups & Teams


...? Groups and Teams Contents Page Introduction 2. Discussion………………………………………… 6 2 Impact of Belbin’s team role theory……… 6 2.1.1 Leadership Styles……………………… 6 2.1.2 Conflict Management…………………...8 2.1.3 Theories of Group Development……….8 2.2 Survival Game………………………………..11 2.3 Summary of Belbin team Roles………………13 3. Conclusion………………………………………......14 4. References…………………………………………..16 GROUPS AND TEAMS An increasing collection of literature has contrasted groups and teams, with suggestions that there is more effectiveness in teams than in groups. A group can be defined as a collection of persons who work in the same place or are put together to finish a given task. The performance of the group results from a coming together of people with an aim...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Groups and Teams

...?Groups and Teams Task: Contents Executive Summary 2. Groups and Teams 3. Mary Brown Scenario 4. Theories On The Leadership Skills, Problem Solving And Decision Making Linked With Mary Brown Scenario 5. Summary of Belbin’s Team Roles and their impact on leadership skills, problem solving and decision making. A. Implementers B. Coordinators C. Shapers D. Plants E. Resource Investigator F. The Monitor Evaluator G. The Team Worker H. The Completers Finishers 6. Conclusion 7. Bibliography Executive Summary In this explicit study, I shall explicate, in detail, various areas with regard to groups and teams. In the first section of this document, I shall critically discuss the impact of Belbin team roles in the three areas that I shall major...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Groups and Teams Paper

...?Running Head: PSYCHOLOGY Groups and Teams Client Inserts His/her Client Inserts Grade Client Inserts Groups and Teams For years, many individuals have not been able to distinguish between a group and a team (Hardingham, 1998). For a normal individual, these are just collective words meaning that they do not even require separation. To others, saying ‘we have formed a team’ means the same as ‘we have formed a group’. Hardingham (1998) finds a great difference between the two words – teams have particular goals and each member upholds and works towards achieving them while groups are just numbers of people. Important to note, in a team, there is a common goal that requires inputs of each and every member to accomplish. In simple words...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Groups and Teams

...? Groups and Teams al Affiliation The research study is on the communication and group dynamics and was carried outin the GMU course management fall semester in 1996. The study was driven by the motive of improving the structure and direction given to teams. For the purpose of research, four teams were created and after the completion of the assignment, analysis of the work done was carried out, and two teams that were regarded as the worst performing were selected. Each member of the two selected teams was interviewed, so as to get the details of what could have let their team down. Several reasons were collected and comparison made. The major reasons that had affected the performance of the groups were: leadership, communication...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Groups and teams

... Two poorly functioning groups Introduction Thomasina Borkman and Valeria Castleman were involved in a methodical investigation in 1996 whereby they examined and explored communication issues in a total of seven teams. The team members were graduates from Brad Cox’s PSOL course. This methodical investigation was established with the main objective of investigating and comprehending the manner in which teams or groups conduct their activities, jobs, or chores so as to increase or progress the organization as well as their bearings. All the activities were electrically related as the groups were required to design a digital invention for sale at the end of the semester. Two poorly functioning groups or teams were identified and denoted...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Groups and Teams

...Groups and Teams Working in groups is considered to be an efficient way of carrying out work in most places, whether it is a school, a social setup or a company. When a person works individually then boredom can creep in or the individual runs the risk of completely loosing the enthusiasm to complete the task at hand. All this can be avoided while working in a team. By working in groups one is not only exposed to multiple ideas, a range of experiences but it also teaches a person to get along with others. A group is formed when many individuals pool in their efforts together to complete a task or achieve a goal. The study of groups and group dynamics plays a very important part in the study of organizational behavior. Groups are a common...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Groups and Teams Paper

...Groups and Teams Recognizing that putting and letting individual employees work together can bring about higher productivity and efficiency, business organizations have began building groups to tackle specific tasks. However, it should be noted that not all groups within the context of a firm succeeds from merely doing this. Drawing from real world examples, some groups often fail to become a high performance team. Companies often realize that putting individual employees to work together is not sufficient to create a productive team. Business organizations must work and put significant effort in order to transform a group into a high performance team. Harvey Dubin (2005) stresses the need for high performance team: "A high-performing...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Teams and Groups

According to the Treetop case (495-497) the following are the major symptoms that something has gone wrong at Treetop: ‘Supervisors seldom visit thepackaging department .This is particularly true of the afternoon shift...’
‘The mill’s ratings have started to declined over the last year or two’
‘Several clients have complained about the appearance of the finished product’
‘A few large customers switched to competitors’ timber’ because of ‘substandard appearance of Treetop’s packaging’
‘Packaging department has recorded decreasing productivity over the past couple of years, with the result that a large backlog of finished product is typically stockpiled outside the packaging building.’
‘The morning shift is unable to...
1 Pages(250 words)Case Study

Groups and Teams

...Groups and Teams al Affiliation Groups and Teams Enlisting the Multiple Factors That Caused the Poor Functioning of Each Group The multiple factors that caused the poor function of each group are summarized in the tabular form below: Category of Factors TEAM A TEAM B Delegation of Roles Failure to designate roles and responsibilities according to the consensus of all members Failure to designate roles and responsibilities according to the consensus of all members Leadership Assumed leader (All Talk) dropped out in the middle of the project The leader role (Organizer) was noted to be assumed and not elected by consensus, and was replaced by another person (Technical Leader) towards the end of the project Communication Accepted norm or mode...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Work Groups and Teams

... Work Group and Teams Abstract Work groups and work teams are terms that are used interchangeably these days. In broader aspects, work groups or teams are defined as two or more individuals that work in correlation with each other in order to achieve a common goal. In today’s highly competitive era, the organizations depend highly on their team structures, that work together in order to achieve the organizational goals with high effectiveness and efficiency. There have been many techniques devised that can lead to the formation of effective team structures at a work place. The team structures have been modified over time to meet the challenges of current global environment so that the organizations could perform competitively...
6 Pages(1500 words)Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Book Report/Review on topic Literature Review On Groups & Teams for FREE!

Contact Us