Download file to see previous pages...
In the testing of cosmetics, various cleaners and various other consumer products, numerous animals are putrefied, made blind and killed each year by companies. These animals are supposed to breathe in poisonous gases, dogs are required to eat insecticides while rabbits have scarring compounds smeared on their bodies and eyes. Most of the tests that are conducted on animals are not a requirement of the law and in most cases; their outcomes are inexact and misrepresentative. Regardless of whether a product harms an animal or not, it still ends up in the shelves for customers to buy (PETA). The fatal and unpleasant experiments that take place as part of huge supervisory analysis initiatives are in most instances financed by taxpayers’ money.
Thesis: Millions of animals experience suffering and are ultimately killed in various kinds of experiments even though modern alternatives have demonstrated that they can produce more accurate results compared to the animal tests
Animals testing, which is also known as in vivo testing involves the use of animals that are not human in testing some where some of the experiments entail the observation of the behavior of the animals. These tests are conducted in universities, medical institutions, drug companies and commercial facilities that provide the services to other industries. Some of the research entails pure research like genetics, developmental biology, testing of drugs as well as cosmetics among other things. The animals may also be used in teaching various disciplines, breeding purposes as well as defense tests, but the activity of using animals in testing has varying degrees of regulation in different nations.
Globally, it is approximated that the number of animals ranging from fish to primates used every year may reach tens of millions and sometime more than a hundred million. These numbers do not include the invertebrates like mice and frogs
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
In defence of beagles: the socio-economic implications of using beagles in animal testing. The long and well-explored debate on animal testing has led many animal rights to be recognized in the society. In turn, the efforts led by many animal rights groups have helped ratify several laws to promote the rights of animals and fight against animal testing.
The medical practitioners have credited this procedure due its cheapness, human-friendliness and its relative efficiency. However, criticism has emerged to raise concerns of animal cruelty and species extinction, and ineffectiveness of the process in providing a guarantee to human safety.
Many alternatives have been supported by the anti-test supporters including computer simulation model but they have been declined due to their inability to calculate all the variables that show up when an animal is used. As shown below there are many reasons why animal testing is still a practice more so in the cosmetic field in spite the criticism.
There is an evident lack of concern in the society towards one another let alone the case of animals, one man's suffering is another man's pleasure and this becomes even more barbaric in the case of animals. The human beings have taken it for granted that animals don't have a life and they can be used any which way but this perception is very wrong and must be changes before it's too late.
When we look back at these events, we can’t help but think about how cruel and unjust these tests were. But what we fail to see is that these kinds of actions have been and are still going on today. Living beings are still held in captivity under unfit
In this milieu, experiments and innovation have become important to ensure effective interventions in healthcare settings. However, similar to every other research or invention project, healthcare experiments also bear a degree of ethical responsibilities, wherein
According to the paper despite the fact that animals should not be subjected to painful and potentially lethal experiments for the sake helping develop cures and medical procedures that would save human life, their relevance in this aspect cannot be overemphasized. Nevertheless, while life is treated as precious, both for animals and humans, it is evident that none should be denied the right to live a life free of pain and suffering.
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic We must ban animal testing for FREE!