V as a Terrorist or Hero - Essay Example

 V as a terrorist or hero This book is one of Alan Moore’s powerful works. It was a Portland Mercury new trademark edition. It was also a graphic novel, which inspired a movie, V For vendetta that was a hit. The book involves a moving story about loss of individuality and freedom. V For vendetta occurs in totalitarian U.K. after the devastating clashes and wars that transformed the face of the planet. It was due to the conditions such as lack of political freedom, high levels of oppressions and segregation of the minority that Vendetta came out strongly to fight. He fought the oppressors through absurd acts like terrorism (Moore 145). He used crude ways and strategies to get back to the perpetrators of the inhuman acts. This makes the novel to be a captivating tale of bloodlines that exist between evil and ideological good. V as a hero V is a freedom fighter. He is the only person who dares take the government on, and to point out that they are wrong. He blows up some structures to make a statement against the dictatorship. He executes some guilty people who were being protected from punishment by big government- 13.1.1-2.1. He does murder, nonetheless he does not kill even one innocent individual. All the people killed by V are criminals, and they deserve it. In this novel, the character V specifically condemns the local people more than the government as the cause of the dominant oppression and mistreatment that is ongoing. He blames the people for not reacting to the various exploitation, oppression or fraud they experience in the country. He classifies this issue as a responsibility displacement. He says, “You gave them the power to make your decisions for you” (Moore 117). This means that people have the power to make their own decisions but they have bowed to the oppressors and given them the authority and responsibility to decide on their behalf. He strived to change this mind set by insisting that people do as they please. He incited individuals to become solely responsible for their lives’ experiences. In the novel, V discourages the local people from shrinking or becoming complacent and letting other people decide their lives for them. He insisted that all people have equal chances and right so no one should bully the others and make decisions for them. He believed that the citizens themselves were responsible for the shambles that existed in the country. He suggested that people’s submissiveness to the oppressors was what allowed the oppression evil to prevail in the country. He changed people’s perception and motivated them to take action since inaction only brought discrimination and exploitation to them. What the character V does is necessary even though it appears to be very evil. To regain his individualism and freedom he had to use crude means. He had no better option that he would use to get back to the oppressors. He had to give them a taste of their own medicine. As much it was wrong and inhuman, it was a necessary evil that would bail them out from the situation that they were facing. Using the crude methods was the most appropriate way to make the oppressors have a taste of their own medicine (Moore 155). It was an effective way of making them know how what they are doing to other people feels. Through doing the act the character V, regain his individualism and peace of mind. He found contentment and relief in what he did, as he believed he was serving justice. He believed it was better to fight for people’s right than staying calm and dying in the process. V is used by the authors of the novel to reach out to the society. He was depicted as a symbol of anti-oppression. He acted as a role model in fighting the oppressors. He was like the revelation for the people being mistreated and oppressed. V is brought out as a leader who does what has to be done for people to gain their freedom and individualism. It is necessary for him to use evil to fight evil. Through his actions, the society was motivated to fight for their rights and freedom. During the war period, freedom was not offered it was earned through constant wars and retaliation. The oppressors had to strive and use any means possible to earn their independence. The authors bring out V’s evil methods as necessary and effective way to reach out to the oppressors. The oppressors did not value human life and they were not paying attention to the grievances of their subjects. The only way to get their attention was to engage them in war. V’s action came in handy in getting their full attention. It was through his actions that people started getting freedom. His actions got the expressed to their senses and pushed them to do something that would save them from their situation. As much as there was death of innocent people involved in V’s crude strategies, his actions were completely necessary for the freedom of the people in the days to come. As much as innocent people died, it was for the right course and reasons. The people died while fighting for freedom so that their descendants would live in better conditions than them. Their death was justified as it was for a worthy course and objective. It was better for the people to die fighting for their freedom than leave most of their life being marginalized, enslaved and oppressed. The outcome of V’s actions had more benefits than the disadvantages. Even those who were against his methods somehow benefited from them. After the war many people gained freedom and those who remained under oppression were more enlightened and encouraged to fight for their freedom and rights. V acted as a motivator and symbol of freedom. People who emulated and joined him in the struggle against oppression gained their rights. His evil deeds were necessity to better future of the people. V as a terrorist At the same time as much as V’s actions may have had some benefits it was totally irrelevant and inhuman.  V is an anarchist terrorist. He blows up populated buildings -14.1.2, undoubtedly killing civilians. He refuses to accept anyone else’s point of view since he fanatically believes his view is the only way to see things. He murders, not only cold-bloodedly, but also deliberately torturing people to insanity- 33.2.1-25.1.2. He brainwashes Evey, and gradually makes her see his own philosophy and believe it. As much as V’s actions were necessary, they were not the right means to address the people’s grievances. He should not have incited people to use crude strategies to fight for freedom and independence. His ways were unnecessary as it led to the death of many innocent people. He had to right to judge who is right and who is wrong. He used terrorism tactics and the oppressors were in the midst of innocent people (Moore 125). It is clear that he should have used more peaceful means like mass movements and hunger strikes instead of attacking with crude means. As much as he uses force to gain freedom, it led to more severe and inhuman actions by the oppressors. V’s actions were not right at all as it made him to be same with the oppressors. This is because his actions led to the death of very many people. He incited people to go to war without considering the consequences. A lot of people were killed in the war against the oppressors since also the oppressors used force to fight back the radicals. The fact that his actions gave him contentment means that he had just become inhuman like the oppressors(Moore 240). Using crude ways to attack people made him to be an oppressor too. It makes him to be the bad guy as he does not consider human life in his course of action. V’s action brought a lot of confusion and disorderliness in the whole situation. The whole process would have been a lot better if he used peaceful means. Less people would have died and maybe the oppressors would have come to their senses by themselves. His crude actions really divided people instead of uniting them. There was outstanding conflict of interest as some people were against his crude methods of fighting for freedom. People were more disorderly in pushing for their freedom and rights as they were not sure of the side to join. There was ideological difference as there were people who opposed the oppressors, others who supported V’s movements and others were against both V and the oppressors (Moore 132). This enhanced disunity and elongated the war. Things would have been far much better if people considered the peaceful options. By doing so things would have been much organized and orderly. People would have been so united and effective in handling the oppressors. If V would work with other people, the strategies implemented would have been much more unifying and efficient in terms of reaching out to the oppressors. Less innocent people would have died and fewer expenses incurred. Part two The experience helped me as the writer to develop analytical thinking skills. I was able to consider both sides of the situation through critical thinking. I learnt that as much as V’s actions were evil and inhuman they were also necessary in terms of opening people’s eyes and motivating them to overcome their fears and fight for their freedom. Before V took action there were people who had accepted their fate as inferior and marginalized but V tactics changed their mind about this. As a reader I learned to think and relate to both sides of the characters action. As a reader I was able to understand how an author can use his writings to invoke thinking. I learned the book was more interesting because a reader could relate to the events and situations being addressed. Reading the book and writing this experimental farm has enhanced my thinking capacity. I’ve gained analytical skills as it has enabled me address the situations from both points of view. Through thinking of points to support V’s action and points against his actions one gains deeper understanding and relations to how things were confusing in the real situation. After writing the experiment, I have learnt to pay attention to details as a reader before passing judgment or supporting one side. The experiment enables the reader to be considerate of both sides of a situation before making a choice. Works Cited Alan Moore, David Lloyd. V for Vendetta. California: DC Comics, 2014. Read More