Why the Global Population Growth Should Be Treated as an Emergent Problem in Countries Worldwide - Essay Example

The issue is clearly stated and there can be no confusion in regard to its aspects. It should be noted that the issue is made clear in the following two ways: a) direct reference is made to the issue and b) the potential implications of the issue for humans and the planet are mentioned, leading the reader to the identification of the article’s main issue.

1. Certain phrases referring to the issue are the following ones: 1) 3rd par., 1st page: ‘Unless population size…independence’ and 2) 5th par., 2nd page: ‘warned that…scarcer’.
2. Conclusion
3. The author’s conclusion is that for quite a long there has been made no reference to the specific issue. The author notes that this silence is quite unjustified.
4. The conclusion is clearly stated. In fact, in the last paragraph, the author notes that ‘we've remained too silent for far too long; this phrase illustrates the view of the author in regard to the strategy followed up today for handling the particular problem.
5. The conclusion is related to the question raised in this article but not directly. In fact, the conclusion highlights the fact that no action has been taken up today for addressing global population growth but it does not focus on the key reason for which such action should be taken.

3. Evidence
4. The reasons that support the evidence are differentiated: a) for Paul Ehrlich, the continuous global population growth could result in chaos, b) in the context of an article published in Time magazine, global population growth could lead to the increase of instability and c) the magazine Scientific American has promoted the idea that global population growth would threaten the availability of food.
5. The first of the above reasons are based on a personal belief of Paul Ehrlich; the relationship between global population growth and instability is based on the personal experience of General Michael Hayden, the author of the article published in Time magazine. As of the third reason, the relationship between global population growth and increased food needs is based on the personal belief of the American economist, as this belief probably results from the study of demographic trends in countries worldwide.
6. The evidence is related to the conclusion but not directly. In fact, the evidence helps to understand the reasons for which initiatives should be taken for global population growth but it cannot explain while such actions have not been taken so far. In any case, the evidence used can be considered credible, being based on the findings of scientific research, as developed by the professionals involved in the relevant texts.
7. Judgment and Reflection
8. The evidence cannot persuade the reader to respect the conclusion. In fact, the evidence presents certain aspects of the global population growth but these views are not supported by relevant empirical evidence, given the impression of personal belief and not so much of conclusions based on extensive research on the particular issue; such research can only be assumed but it is not presented.
9. In the particular article, a critical piece of information is omitted: What are the methods suggested for the control of global population growth? Without referring to these methods it would be difficult to decide whether the control of global population growth is ethical or not.
10. The article focuses on the need for controlling global population growth but it does not explain the following fact: could the control of global population growth affect human rights? In other words, it is not made clear whether the control of global population growth would threaten the value of human life. Quality of life cannot be considered as being of higher importance than life itself.