Pop Culture: The Culture of Everyday Life - Annotated Bibliography Example

number Delaney, Tim. “Pop Culture: An Overview”. Philosophy Now. Nov/Dec. Retrieved on 27th November from: http://philosophynow.org/issues/64/Pop_Culture_An_Overview. This is an article with a lot of information about popular culture. Information includes; the definition of popular culture, information on perceptions concerning popular culture, examples of popular culture, folk and high culture, formation of popular culture, and its sources. This article was used because it has relevant information to the essay. It provided an understanding of popular culture through a different perspective. It provided a clear difference between popular culture and other cultures. It also has information on the role of popular culture in the society and its elements. This information was important in support of the central claim because of the elements of popular culture provided, its role in the society and its definition. These were important in making the reader understand that popular culture does not destroy society values and morals. Pros: It is a reliable source of information because it is a magazine and magazines are considered scholarly. It was easily accessible. It has relevant information required to argue in the essay. Cons: The article has no evidence of support from other sources of literature. It means that it is a one author’s idea. It could be a credible source of information, but any writing with no evidence of support from other sources reduces reliability. The author may be a prominent person as indicated in the site (A member of the American Culture Association and Popular Culture Association), but lack of citations in his work could be a sign of lack of research. It is not, however, inevitable that if his work is not cited, then he did not conduct any research. Donnelly, Peter. and Coakley, Jay. Role of Recreation in Promoting Social Inclusion. Working Paper Series. 2002. Retrieved on 27th November 2012 from: http://www.offordcentre.com/VoicesWebsite/library/reports/documents/laidlaw/donnelly.pdf. This is an article about social inclusion. It discusses social inclusion as an approach to human development and social well-being. Social inclusion in this article recognizes the importance of diversity and difference in understanding community and national level identity. Social inclusion in the article also calls for recognition of shared aspirations among people and commonality of lived experiences. It shows how social inclusion is more than bringing outsiders in and includes closing social, physical, and economic distances that separate people. It does not only remove barriers between them. There is also information about the five cornerstones of inclusion and how inclusion is built in a community. This paper was used because it has relevant information about social inclusion. In the essay, social inclusion is one of the outcomes of popular culture. Understanding social inclusion, how it is built, and its cornerstones were very important in understanding how popular culture leads to social inclusion. This information was very important in supporting the positive role of popular culture in the society. Through the cornerstones of social inclusion, it was easy to illustrate in the essay, and make the readers understand how popular culture leads to valued recognition, material well-being of people, involvement and engagement, human development and reduction of proximity. All these promote good social values and morality in one way or the other. Pros: Had very important information to prove a point about the role of popular culture in the society. The article was easily accessible. It is a working paper series and a credible source of information. Cons: None observed or experienced. Fedorak, Shirley. A. Pop Culture: The Culture of Everyday Life. Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press, 2009. Print. This is a book about popular culture, popular culture and the media, popular culture and expression, and popular culture and gatherings. It has considered popular culture and its characteristics. These are mainly its power on the society, the degree of reflecting societal values, world view and ideal, and the concept of popular culture as more than entertainment. This book was used because it has information on pop culture. The paper was about claims about pop culture, but the reader needs to know what pop culture is. It provided the definition of pop culture and some of the claims about pop culture. It also provided information on the importance and use of popular culture, which was used to argue against the idea of pop culture contributing to immorality in the society. Pros: It was easily accessible. The book has precise information about the definition of popular culture. It has provided relevant information to the topic of discussion: From defining pop culture, it has also explained its role in the society, which adds more information to understanding what popular culture is. It is also a credible source of information that can be relied upon. Cons: This book is an author’s idea expanded by knowledge from other sources. Other authors may have different ideas about his definition or his perception on popular culture. Critics could have different definitions, which may alter, the reasoning used in the essay. The use of other sources to support ideas, however, makes it a credible source. Stephanie, Samuel. “Are Americans Getting Comfortable With Immorality?” The Christian Post U.S. May. 2011. Retrieved on 27th November 2012 from: http://www.christianpost.com/news/are-americans-getting-comfortable-with-immorality-50591/ This is an article about the sources of immorality in America and how immorality is perceived in America. It also provides information about the perceptions on popular culture and the negative effects of popular culture in the society. This article was used because it has information on the role of the popular culture through the media in passing immoral and amoral messages to the people. It also has important information about the perception of popular culture. Specifically, it gives a perfect example of misconception or different conception of popular culture that considers it harmful to the society. This information has been used to illustrate the role of misconceptions in misleading some people, to think that popular culture destroys the values of the society. It has also provided information on perceptions of those who want popular culture censored. This information has been used to explain more about how popular culture can be used positively in the society. Pros: It was easily accessible. It had specific relevant information for clarification of issues in the essay: specifically, misconception about popular culture. Cons: This is a Christian site and this could be a determining factor in the kind of views it puts across to people. The perception on celebrities and popular TV shows could be negative just because of the way the celebrities dress and pass messages to the public. It could be a partial source of information. The author is a reporter and has not used any credible sources to support his arguments. This reduces the credibility of the source. White, Cameron. and Walker, Trenia. Tooning In: Essays on Popular Culture and Education. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008. Print. This is a book with different essays on popular culture and education. A specific topic that was focused and was important for the argumentative essay is, “Tooning In: Engaging Popular Culture for Social Efficacy in Education”. The topic has information on the role of schools in promoting social efficacy, definition of popular culture, the role of popular culture in the society, and how popular culture can be integrated in the education system to promote social efficacy. The idea brought forward by this book is that schools have an important role to play in ensuring social efficacy, and this can be promoted by popular culture. It is from this idea that the argument in support of the central claim was obtained. It supports the paper through the knowledge that it provides, about the ability of popular culture to influence important aspects of the society to ensure social efficacy. The main point of those arguing against the use of popular culture is that it destroys social values and morality. The knowledge provided by this book gives contrary information. It provides a different idea of perceiving popular culture and proposes its integration into the societal system. With this idea, it strongly supports popular culture as a builder of societal and moral values. It provides the essay with the right kind of information that it needs. Pros: The book had important information relevant for making the reader understand the importance of popular culture in the society. The information was fit for arguments in support of the central claim. The book was easily accessible. It is a credible source of information that can be relied upon. Cons: This is a book is also some authors’ idea expanded by knowledge from other sources. It proposes the use of popular culture in education to promote social efficacy supported by other sources, but may receive resistance from other authors. This is especially if other authors are social researchers with evidence of the effect of integration of popular culture in education systems. Zharkevich, Ina. “The Role of Civil Society in Promoting Political Accountability in Fragile States: the case of Tajikistan”. International NGO Training and Research Center Report. 2010. Retrieved on 27th November 2012 from: http://www.intrac.org/data/files/resources/682/The-Role-of-Civil-Society-in-Promoting-Political-Accountability-in-Fragile-States.pdf This is a case study of Tajikistan showing the role of civil society in political accountability. The report was used because of the type of information it provided. It has provided a perfect example of the role of civil societies in the world. Civil societies are formed to fight for the rights of the people, and it is a product of people’s expression of how to deal with rising corruption and illegal matters in states. Pros: This is an organizational report, therefore, a credible source of information. Cons: None observed or experienced. Works Cited Delaney, T. “Pop Culture: An Overview”. Philosophy Now. Nov/Dec. 2012. Retrieved on 27th November 2012 from: http://philosophynow.org/issues/64/Pop_Culture_An_Overview. Donnelly, P.& Coakley, J. Role of Recreation in Promoting Social Inclusion. Working Paper Series. 2002. Retrieved on 27th November 2012 from: http://www.offordcentre.com/VoicesWebsite/library/reports/documents/laidlaw/donnelly.pdf. Fedorak, S. A. Pop Culture: The Culture of Everyday Life. Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press, 2009. Print. Stephanie, S. “Are Americans Getting Comfortable With Immorality?” The Christian Post U.S. May. 2011. Retrieved on 27th November 2012 from: http://www.christianpost.com/news/are-americans-getting-comfortable-with-immorality-50591/ White, C &Walker, T. Tooning In: Essays on Popular Culture and Education. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008. Print. Zharkevich, Ina. “The Role of Civil Society in Promoting Political Accountability in Fragile States: the case of Tajikistan”. International NGO Training and Research Center Report. 2010. Retrieved on 27th November 2012 from: http://www.intrac.org/data/files/resources/682/The-Role-of-Civil-Society-in-Promoting-Political-Accountability-in-Fragile-States.pdf Read More