Download file to see previous pages...
The writer also provides a lot of quotes from the writings of both the feminist writers to support the arguments. The paragraphs are organized in a coherent manner with each paragraph building on the previous one. However, it lacks a conclusion and there are few grammatical and punctuation errors e. g. the writer writes “oppression” instead of “oppression”.
This writer provides a catching introduction by directly addressing the two writers, Anzaldua and Kingston. It is important to highlight the creativity when the writer notes that the two women share more than just their XX chromosomes. After the introduction paragraph, the writer provides a background of how the writers encountered sexist oppression. In the next paragraph, the writer adequately describes how the two writers use their languages as the strongest weapons against sexist oppression and patriarchy. This writer also provides relevant quotes that support these arguments. In conclusion, the writer describes examples of use of language as both shields and methods of attack. The essay is well organized, with each paragraph complementing the other. Though there are extremely few punctuation errors, the writer uses a few paragraphs. These errors can be fixed by proofreading through the essay again, while the paragraphs can be divided up to cover different points that are in a single paragraph.
This writer does not adequately capture the needs of the question. While the question demands that the writer develop a detailed argument that compares how Anzaldua and Kingston use language as a weapon against patriarchy with detail, this writer only provides summaries of the two writings. The writer just details the events that took place in the book including instances of sexist oppression and patriarchy. However, the writer fails to derive the differences and similarities of how the two writers tackle these issues. At the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Consequently, this has yielded to colossal funding especially by the states’ regimes in aiding their citizens to manage it and prolong their lives. For instance, US contends of having used approximately more than $174 billion 2007 both in managing and treatment of the disease.
The paper itself is interesting, but the title needs a major overhaul.
The claim is that patient power is low because we as a people have entrusted our care to the likes of doctors and pharmaceutical companies who we may not even be able to trust, given the fact that there are an alarmingly high number of deaths each year of people who are taking normally-prescribed medications.
The most memorable part of the essay is the portion where revelation is made that up to today, not much effort has been made to better the sovereignty of lesser groups by refusing to implement regulations and policies that serve
The writer’s point in this study appears to be about the impact of skin-to-skin contact between mother and child immediately after birth of the child. To this extent I believes the writer achieve to state categorically the thesis and an outline of the research
the organization, but also affect their ability to fulfill their professional obligations effectively (Solotoff & Kramer, 1994).Consequently, the interviews and surveys must be conducted privately.
In addition, the article has underscored the fact that organizations have a
??s question, ‘Why is it that so many times in history the meeting of two cultures has ended in painful consequences for the less powerful?’ relates to the thesis in terms of exploring the reasons for unfavorable consequences of cultural interaction. The writer has
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Peer Review for FREE!