Download file to see previous pages...
The writer succeeded in explaining art as a mortal discipline, which has changed in form from the past to now, but still holds the main ideas.
Though the author has sidelined science to a larger extent in his book, I totally agree with the author in some instances. He claims that the impulse of painting neither comes from observation nor painting, but rather an encounter in life. An artist needs to create an impression on their mind in order to compose their work (Janson, H. and Janson, A. 23). That impression, once created, can be interpreted and put down on paper. What forms an artist is the ability to create something from nothing. On a creative twist of events, the author brings-up the idea of collaboration between the painter and their work. In essence, collaboration designates mutual understanding of artists on the nature of his work and the intended purpose (Janson, H. and Janson, A. 23). The essay, to summarize it all, is cleverly architected as I felt that the writers presented a sharp view on artistry and how to develop it. Even though, it exhibits a number of weaknesses the essay is comprehensive and expresses clear opinions.
The Bird and Poet: the Hunter and the Poet is a poem written by Edward. O. Wilson (Janson, H. and Janson, A. 34). Unlike Berger, Wilson has touched on both art and science comprehensive. His poem is extremely interesting, and from a critical point of view, I felt that the poem opposes crucial points read in John Berger’s writing. Edward strongly asserts that art and science must exist coherently. According to the Edward, science cannot exist without art, and art can exist without science. This was prevalent in his poem as he examined numerous analogies in art and science such as the aspect of creativity. Edward demystifies a claim by John Berger that art is all about being receptive. Being receptive means to appreciate nature and developing a distinctive likeness to
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Much of his work is however based on the artistic world of painting in which he analyses the current technological advancements that the world is currently going through and how this has affected the change in perception in different spheres of life (107).
The adage that science seeks truth and art seeks beauty is a simplified explanation, and though accurate, fails to recognize the similarities and connections between the two endeavors.
Science and art have been closely linked through time and have relied heavily on one another for their advancement.
theorized that teaching can occur only when the very act of teaching leads a teacher or more capable other to assist the learning performance of a student during the course of a learning activity”.(Duran, 1989). Knowledge is the core of human existence as we know it today,
Although both authors introduce a vast scope of input from such a history, the focus here will be on Kant particularly, and his notions of the aesthetic. Both discuss Kant at length, including his thoughts on how the imagination is
It is this desire to recapture the past which makes conservation almost an art within itself. Moreover, the science of preservation allows us to marvel at the original elements that were used by the original artists.
I don’t mind
ibutions of Dostoevsky, through such important works as ‘The Brothers Karamazov’, to the development of the world views of Albert Einstein; the interpretations that the two men had with regard to the relationship between art and science, which overlap in many respects; and
This Romantic art movement re-established significant ways to look at things from a different perspective. By integrating the concept of nature, new skeptical ideas were developed as the old ones were ruled out. This paper will focus on the Romantic Art movement and its relation to science.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Art, science, and imagination for FREE!