Use of Web 2.0 in Writing - Assignment Example

Some of the reasons that I use to prove my thesis are:
- Web 2.0 promotes interaction and this process leads to student content creation and sharing. Sharing of quality ideas can lead to greater learning. This can be proven through studies that provide evidence for this relationship.
- Web 2.0 engages self-regulated learning and teamwork because students work on their own and with others. This can be proven through studies that provide evidence for this relationship.
- Web 2.0 supports critical and reflective participation as long as structured guidelines are provided and instructors place a high value on critical thinking and the use of scholarly references to support claims and ideas. This can be proven through studies that provide evidence for this relationship.

In the first essay, we only worked with Lanier and Keen, but in your second essay, you'll be required to utilize the sources you've found for your annotated bibliography. Now that you have multiple viewpoints on your topic, it's important to cover the issues of fairness and objectivity when working with outside sources.

*Fairness: I expect all of you to represent each author's point of view accurately and fairly--this means not changing the context in which one's words were said or changing the meaning. There should be no unfair distortions.

*Objectivity: When you argue for your thesis, you're out to prove your point. However, this doesn't mean that you need to attack every viewpoint you disagree with. Each body paragraph that contains a source, whether or not you disagree with the source, should be represented objectively. This means introducing all sources in the same manner, then when you engage with the source in your analysis, you can not only express your opinion but also prove it.

If we want to convince others to believe in our claims, we should respond to the strongest arguments of our opponents. In addition, objectivity is important because we want to also learn from the views of others.

We can be fair and objective in our papers and still argue for a main point because we are addressing the concerns and points of our opponents. Hence, we show our readers that we know how to undercut these claims, using different appeals and evidence.