LOVE Individual privacy vs. national security - Essay Example

LOVE" Individual privacy vs. national security Following the September in US terrorist attacks, terrorism threat has been acknowledged as a reality. To counter these challenges, security agencies have proposed measures to intensify security. The individual privacy vs. national security research project will seek to establish whether the imposed anti-terrorism measure will compromise people’s freedom and privacy. This project will assist in evaluation of the level of democracy in the country.

Terrorism is a national as well as a global issue. This implies that compromise of individual privacy and freedom in pursuit of national security is a global as well as a national issue. The project will therefore utilize findings from the country to establish the severity of the issues on a global scale. Due to its scope and importance, the project will be conducted using primary sources such as journals, reports from various agencies and newspaper articles. Scholarly articles required in this project will be obtained from the library while relevant reports will be obtained from the concerned agencies.

Compromise of individual privacy in pursuit of national security existed before the September 11, attacks. At the heights of World War II, nearly 12,000 Japanese Americans were forced into concentration camps for reasons related to national security (ACLU, 2001). According to Avery (2004), the public feels that issues of national security compromise their privacy. Previous research findings on the issue have proved that intensification of surveillance by security agencies hamper formation of close relationships among people (Emanuel, 2004).

To enhance security, the government has authorized all telecom operators in the country to install systems that enable government agencies to access private communications. These preliminary findings will direct the research project. ReferencesACLU. (2001). Because freedom cannot protect itself, ACLU Press Release. [viewed February 12, 2012]Avery, G. (2004). Bioterrorism, Fear, and Public Health Reform: Matching a Policy Solution to the Wrong Window, Public Administration Review 64, no. 3: 275.Gross, E. (2004).

The struggle of a democracy against terrorism—Protection of human rights: The right to privacy versus the national interest—The proper balance, Cornell International Law Journal 37 (1), 27-32.Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Terrorism and probability neglect, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26: 121-136