Wild Animals Arent Pets - Essay Example

Wild animals still have the intrinsic trait of being insecure. Therefore, people ought to vision beyond their passions and seek to secure themselves.

Another reason for not legalizing the taming of exotic animals is that of common sense (USA Today). Wild animals are meant to be as such. Therefore, people should cage normal pets as opposed to exotic ones. This is because there are animals designated to be pets and others meant to stay in the natural stay. This general sense is what those keeping wild animals lack.

In addition, wild animals can never be pets because of their passion for the exotic animal. This refers to the verity that certain people take to mistreating the exotic animals. This happens when they fail to bestow their liberty of nature.  Moreover, wild animals thrive in conditions with the provisions of nature. Therefore, when someone takes to mistreating the animals, this depicts that they entail no fairness.

Opinion countering that of the editorial is that there are exceedingly low chances of deaths caused by exotic animals. For instance, statistics prove that only 3.25 Percent of people become executed by exotic animals (USA Today). Therefore, wild animals pose exceedingly limited risks to people’s safety. There are no explanations as to why people should evade exotic animals becoming their pets.

Another reason is that having wild animals as pets eradicates strain on the natural populace (USA Today). This explains that competition among wild animals becomes exceedingly negligible. Therefore, resources become sufficient for the other masses. On the contrary, tamed animals are availed of necessities by the owner. This ensures that natural endowments are ample for animals.

According to The Humane Society of the United States, another reason is that the exotic populace acts as a backing for extinction of the wildlife. This means that in events where wild animals become rare, the tamed ones save the situation. This is because private owners continue to ensure that the siblings of the animals that they tamed are still protected. This is an exceedingly affluent technique for protecting the wild populace from extinction. Those opposing the idea of wild animals being pets need this confirmation.

In addition, making wild animals become pets ought to be freewill. This means that people have the freedom to choose what pets to keep and the ones to refute. This is because pets are a matter of someone’s decision.  Forcing someone to either keep or disapprove of them is full lunacy (USA Today). Therefore, everyone ought to keep pets that they please without intimidation. Owning exotic animals publicly and confidentially entails no disparity. This is because what matters is guaranteeing the animal’s welfare.

In conclusion, this rebuttal argument diversifies the rationale as to why exotic animals have no classifications as pets. A reason such as common logic among owners of pets is exceedingly crucial. On the contrary, there are counter opinions to the views of the editorial. The two sides depict both the editorial's opinions and the related counterarguments respectively.