Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1580963-explicating-two-poems-compare-and-contrast
https://studentshare.org/english/1580963-explicating-two-poems-compare-and-contrast.
On the whole, to evaluate and compare poems written by two dissimilar poets on a similar matter can prove to be quite an intricate task. In this instance, the two poems in evaluation depict the love and expectation that is supplementary to a child’s innocence or virtuousness. Both poems center on the perception of this world built through the irreproachable eyes and minds of children. Gwendolyn A. Mitchell’s poem; “The Love will Start with a Word about Children” is a radiant poem that celebrate children and their and prospects.
The other poem for assessment is “The Child-World” by James Whitcomb Riley’s which significantly focuses on the world of a child.The two poems are on the subject of childhood with reference to the innocence that is conceded by children in their very hearts as well as wholesomeness of their passions or zeal. The poems moreover depict childhood of the poets and how they experience evocative feelings concerning the preeminent time of their lives which had enormous possibilities but which have become precedent already.
Mutually, the poems characterize delight and recollections of childhood.The disparity between these two poems is that Mitchell’s poem is incredibly optimistic, has its core focus on celebrating children. Riley’s poem, on the other hand, upholds its concern on the poet’s own childhood experience. Mitchell’s poem; “The Love will Start with a Word about Children” encompass straightforward words that illustrate that children have continual potentials as pure and innocent beings. Mitchell articulates her outlook as regards small kids in a reasonably incredible approach.
She has used simple defined word, which is continent, to symbolically stand for children. She considers that just like a continent can have many nations and look forward to a lot of development in its life, the children also have endless possibilities in life. We on no account know what a child will be able to explore. She has especially and confidently expressed the responsibility of parents in helping their kids to explore the world. They get to be acquainted with themselves and their roots through their parents.
She believes that after some time, these children will grow up and will advance or promote matching acquaintance and aptitude to their children. Riley in “The Child-World” has conferred the world of children according to his personal experience. The poet has given the impression of his own home, his street and Indiana of his own childhood. In addition he argues that even in his times, the veterans who were still alive talked a lot regarding what used to be in that particular area. He has well articulated how melancholy times become significant for a person to consider his own childhood.
He has also discuses experiences like eating cherries off a cherry tree as a young boy. He has mentioned the house he has lived in for several years and until he has matured into an adult as well as how he has spent his childhood in that street, that house, and that neighborhood eating cherries off a tree after snow thaws from it. Riley gives a detailed account of the place and he sounds nostalgic about the fact that his childhood is already in the past. In contrast to each poem on the other, Mitchell’s poem is a petite, specific and a concise one which sounds especially optimistic.
It shows a world which is hopeful and has opportunities and love for the kids which are transmitted from generations to generations. In contrast, Riley’s poem is a extensive with a comprehensive description of the place where Riley has spent his childhood. Riley’s poem depicts a sensation of despondency concerning the loss of his childhood and also in relation to the people who have previously gone. While these poems are comparable and related in the sense of focusing on children and the love they bring, they are exclusively diverse from the point of view that Mitchell’s poem focuses on the child’s possibilities in life while Riley’s is constantly a reminder of one’s individual childhood experience.
Conversely, in cooperation the poems have centered on the sheer splendor of childhood.Works cited Gwendolyn A. Mitchell and James Whitcomb Riley. Essence. September 2004. Vol. 35. Issue 5. Pg 286.
Read More