June 2, 2015 Comparative Editorials on Gun Control Introduction There is an ongoing debate regarding the need for gun control in view of ever increasing violent incidents especially perpetuated against helpless children. The recent news of an apparent massacre of 27 people from Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut raised alarm levels to develop drastic measures that would abate casualties from indiscriminate firing of guns…
Download file to see previous pages...
The discourse would present a separate examination of each article’s arguments including supporting contentions. A concluding portion would then assess which editorial was deemed most effective. Editorial One: Australian gun control holds lessons for U.S. The editorial article entitled “Australian gun control holds lessons for U.S.” published online in the USA Today on December 18, 2012 proffered issues that apparently compared the measures taken by Australia in terms of gun control. As an editorial article, the author comes from the Editorial Board, but was not specifically identified. The article’s main thesis was despite sharing similarities between the United States and Australia in terms of having previously experienced violent deaths due to indiscriminate firing of guns, Australia’s gun control policy which was enforced after a 1996 shooting eventually solved the dilemma. According to the discourse, Australian law on gun control necessitated categorizing firearms into five distinct classifications, where “some of the deadliest assault-style weapons and large ammunition clips are now all but impossible for individuals to lawfully own. (Further), firearms are subject to a strict permitting process, and dealers are required to record sales, which are tracked by the national and territorial governments… (In addition,) the law encouraged people to sell their firearms back to the government, which purchased and destroyed about 700,000 of them” (Australian gun control holds lessons for U.S. pars. 4 & 5). Due to the passing of this law, the report disclosed that evident result was no violent gun-related incidents ever occurred. The author used logical arguments through the support of evidential historical records and citing credible findings that apparently revealed the effectiveness of gun control through the law enforced by Australia. However, to verify the details, one made a quick research on the veracity of the facts through a report entitled “Firearm related deaths in Australia, 1991 – 2001” (Mouzos and Rushforth). The report revealed that although there was a decline in the number of firearm related deaths of 521 in 1996, there were still 437 deaths in 1997, 327 in 1998, 353 in 199, 331 in 2000 and 333 in 2001 (Mouzos and Rushforth). The information therefore clearly negates the assertion that no gun-related incidents ever occurred after enforcement of the gun control law. Editorial Two: Gun rights and gun control aren't necessarily exclusive From the Denver Post, the editorial article entitled “Gun rights and gun control aren't necessarily exclusive” published online on September 23, 2012 was likewise written by an unnamed member of the editorial board. The main argument that the article was disclosing apparent preference of the American public through public opinion polls which disclose that “polls in recent years have consistently affirmed that Americans believe it's more important to protect the right to own guns than to enact gun control” (Gun rights and gun control aren't necessarily exclusive par. 6). The discourse likewise made mention of advocates for the right to bear and keep firearms pursuant to the Second Amendment, to wit: “
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1467501-argument
(Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words - 1)
“Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1467501-argument.
This paper will attempt to provide a logically sound argument based on various ethical, legal and organizational theories, which will negate the delusion of employee rights to privacy while performing their jobs. Along with these, some managerial implications will also be discussed.
The claims are strongly supported by warrants, grounds and backings. The warrants, ground, backings of the formal article’s discrimination discussion firmly supports the claims. Thesis Statement The article’s thesis is: The article’s discrimination discussion’s claims, warrants, grounds and formal language have both strengths and weaknesses.
According to their argument, the minority groups are sidelined in terms of accessing higher education. In terms of progressive development, gaps are still noticeable in respect of education accessed by the males and females. In this regard, it seems the girl child still lag behind when considering right to education for all.
Violence amongst young people, it is claimed, is becoming increasingly common and hip-hop is partly to blame. However, not everyone sees it quite like that. Despite its negative press, hip-hop has also been seen as a
In his essay on this fascinating topic, Highlet shows himself to be a true believer. He describes his own relationship with Zen and shows why he thinks Zen can be more than a philosophy.
One of Highlet’s main arguments in his essay is the
Federalism refers to a scenario where partial self governing states operate under a central regime. At this level, the federates and the central government have powers that are dictated by law, and cannot be negated or ignored by either party. Anti-federalism refers to a
These hotels most of the time provide job opportunities to both professionals and non-professionals. The job opportunities can, therefore, be in terms of casual, contract or permanent basis. In this assignment, we will look
Thousands of people are registering for admissions in universities for undergraduate and postgraduate courses (Useem & Miller, 126). Education levels beyond the age of 16 years are however not regarded compulsory.
Many individuals and organizations keep claiming that higher
The unjust decision will also be a bad decision, and will deprive Socrates life of value.
Firstly, Socrates asks and Crito confirms that unjust thing is unjust under any circumstances, even when responding on injustice. Then, Socrates
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Argument for FREE!